Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:18:41 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:51:08 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

..whether one agrees or not, David
Wilcock is far from being ignorant. Neither is Fulford.

Because you may disagree with them may mean kooky to you, that is
your choosing but ignorant they are not.

Do I assume correctly that you do not believe the essence of the
DUMB destruction/story?

Thats putting it mildly.

Put it bluntly then.

Its a crock of s**t dreamt up by conspirowhackos and believed
by imbeciles.

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps not. To be right, you would have to submit
more than your opinion regarding the content of the article in question.
You would have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.

Assailing the writer(s) is extremely weak sauce as surely you are aware.
Personal attacks in lieu of facts is the realm of the, how should I say
this, imbeciles and whackos.

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:18:41 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:51:08 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

..whether one agrees or not, David
Wilcock is far from being ignorant. Neither is Fulford.

Because you may disagree with them may mean kooky to you, that is
your choosing but ignorant they are not.

Do I assume correctly that you do not believe the essence of the
DUMB destruction/story?

Thats putting it mildly.

Put it bluntly then.

Its a crock of s**t dreamt up by conspirowhackos and believed
by imbeciles.

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps not. To be right, you would have to
submit more than your opinion regarding the content of the article in
question.

I did and in fact pointed outr some imbecilic errors

You would have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.


There are pleaty of dumbs out there.

Keith

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:18:41 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:51:08 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

..whether one agrees or not, David
Wilcock is far from being ignorant. Neither is Fulford.

Because you may disagree with them may mean kooky to you, that is
your choosing but ignorant they are not.

Do I assume correctly that you do not believe the essence of the
DUMB destruction/story?

Thats putting it mildly.

Put it bluntly then.

Its a crock of s**t dreamt up by conspirowhackos and believed
by imbeciles.

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps not. To be right, you would have to submit
more than your opinion regarding the content of the article in question.
You would have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.

Assailing the writer(s) is extremely weak sauce as surely you are aware.
Personal attacks in lieu of facts is the realm of the, how should I say
this, imbeciles and whackos.

On 10/8/2011 2:46 PM, Tom wrote:
Personal attacks in lieu of facts is the realm of the, how should I say
this, imbeciles and whackos.

Is that why you do it?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...
Tom wrote:
...
The Knights Templar (created by the Vatican) were the first bankers.


Well no, there were bankers in ancient Mespotamia, the code of Hammurabi
written around 1760 BC includes laws that regulate banking.

Keith

One error destroys the entire credibility of the establishment but should be
ignored or forgiven to revisionists.

In article ,
"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article ,
"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.

On 10/8/2011 3:58 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In ,
"Keith wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.

No, the stars the pyramids may have been aligned with have moved out
of alignment since then. If the ancients wanted us to use the pyramids
as you suggest they would be in alignment now.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Oct 8, 2:58*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:
In article ,
*"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.-

William Shatner of Star Trek told me that the Martians built them.

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 02:22:28 -0700 (PDT), LIBERATOR wrote:

On Oct 8, 2:58*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:
In article ,
*"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.-

William Shatner of Star Trek told me that the Martians built them.

Maybe they did. It wasn't a bunch of Chinese, Aztecs, Egyptians or, for
that matter, anyone today that could build, much less build in the
constraints of time that occurred, the pyramids of subject.