Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

george152 wrote:
On 12/10/2011 6:59 a.m., Keith Willshaw wrote:

On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand. The sand
lies between the tool and the stone block and does the cutting
nicely. Sand is not exactly rare in Egypt.

see Experiments in Egyptian Archaeology: Stoneworking Technology in
Ancient Egypt
Denys A. Stocks

Hey. No fair using facts and evidence against kookdom

It doesn't matter, they never actually pay attention to anyone
else.

Keith

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:44:20 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

george152 wrote:
On 12/10/2011 6:59 a.m., Keith Willshaw wrote:

On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand. The sand
lies between the tool and the stone block and does the cutting
nicely. Sand is not exactly rare in Egypt.

see Experiments in Egyptian Archaeology: Stoneworking Technology in
Ancient Egypt
Denys A. Stocks

Hey. No fair using facts and evidence against kookdom

It doesn't matter, they never actually pay attention to anyone else
unless I am showing my pics butt****ing children.

Keith The Butt****ing Pony

SWELL!
--
Know me. **** "w" of alt.music.jehtro-tull; "w"'s real name Thomas
or Tom Giarmo

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:59:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Thor Kuntelin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:30:00 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Maybe they did. It wasn't a bunch of Chinese, Aztecs, Egyptians or,
for that matter, anyone today that could build, much less build in
the constraints of time that occurred, the pyramids of subject.

Except for the minor problem that we know that the blocks
of stone used to build the pyramids were worked with
stone and copper tools.

In fact attempts have been made to prove that the pyramid could be
constructed using the known ancient Egyptian tools and methods.
Egyptologist Mark Lehner has made an attempt with a large group of
people but failed to even create a 6 m scale model of the pyramid.

A Japanese team funded by Nissan made another attempt to create an 18
m high scale model using the same primitive ancient Egyptian tools
such as chisels and hammers. The once so proud Japanese team returned
home disillusioned and embarrassed, since they had to use jackhammers
to cut the hard stone, only small blocks were carved from the quarry.


On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand.

Except not one copper tool was found on the entire Giza Plateau.

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you..

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.
--
Thor Kuntelin
http://www.anta.com/

Thor Kuntelin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:59:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Thor Kuntelin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:30:00 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Maybe they did. It wasn't a bunch of Chinese, Aztecs, Egyptians
or, for that matter, anyone today that could build, much less
build in the constraints of time that occurred, the pyramids of
subject.

Except for the minor problem that we know that the blocks
of stone used to build the pyramids were worked with
stone and copper tools.

In fact attempts have been made to prove that the pyramid could be
constructed using the known ancient Egyptian tools and methods.
Egyptologist Mark Lehner has made an attempt with a large group of
people but failed to even create a 6 m scale model of the pyramid.

A Japanese team funded by Nissan made another attempt to create an
18 m high scale model using the same primitive ancient Egyptian
tools such as chisels and hammers. The once so proud Japanese team
returned home disillusioned and embarrassed, since they had to use
jackhammers to cut the hard stone, only small blocks were carved
from the quarry.


On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand.

Except not one copper tool was found on the entire Giza Plateau.

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you..

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Nope , the fact that I irritate you is an extra incentive.

Keith

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:02:29 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand.

Except not one copper tool was found on the entire Giza Plateau.

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you..

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Nope , the fact that I irritate you is an extra incentive.

You know, you think you (and your puppets) way
of....uh...."writing"....is as a "big, badass on Usenet." Do you not
realize It actually comes across more like white trailer trash? Someone
of any intellect at all doesn't need to write things like.....

"It doesn't matter, they never actually pay attention to anyone else
unless I am showing my pics butt****ing children.

Keith The Butt****ing Pony"

NOBODY who talks and writes like that to prove themselves as a "big mean
dog on Usenet" has an ounce of respect from anybody. It's a funny
thing, go figure, there's just something about that white trailer trash
talk that grates on the nerves of any one with a lick of sense.

OK, I admit, I had to get the last word in. Your trailer talk just
demands a decent white man's back hand.
--
Thor Kuntelin
http://www.anta.com/

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:57:30 -0400, Thor Kuntelin wrote:

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:59:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Thor Kuntelin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 19:30:00 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Maybe they did. It wasn't a bunch of Chinese, Aztecs, Egyptians or,
for that matter, anyone today that could build, much less build in
the constraints of time that occurred, the pyramids of subject.

Except for the minor problem that we know that the blocks
of stone used to build the pyramids were worked with
stone and copper tools.

In fact attempts have been made to prove that the pyramid could be
constructed using the known ancient Egyptian tools and methods.
Egyptologist Mark Lehner has made an attempt with a large group of
people but failed to even create a 6 m scale model of the pyramid.

A Japanese team funded by Nissan made another attempt to create an 18
m high scale model using the same primitive ancient Egyptian tools
such as chisels and hammers. The once so proud Japanese team returned
home disillusioned and embarrassed, since they had to use jackhammers
to cut the hard stone, only small blocks were carved from the quarry.


On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand.

Except not one copper tool was found on the entire Giza Plateau.

The pyramid is much older than claimed and must have been built by a
culture far superior to the Egyptians. Even today we simply don¢t have
the technology to build an edifice like the Great Pyramid.

The reason why Egyptologists and pyramidiots cling on to their own
archaic theories is that they have no other choice but to defend them.

Many Egyptologists and pyramidiots are Muslim and the Koran simply
states that the Earth is no older than 4000 years. So they simply don¢t
buy any theory that may date the Great Pyramid to a timeframe before the
established date of construction 2589 B.C

As Keel says in Disneyland of the Gods: "We know that pyramid building
was once a universal practice throughout the world. Over six thousand
years ago unknown peoples were assembling great pyramids in Mexico.
Gigantic man-made mounds were constructed in China, Great Britain, North
America, and on remote Pacific islands while the Egyptians were still
living in mud huts along the Nile."

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...
Thor Kuntelin wrote:
...

On the other hand Denys Stocks successfully showed that the stone
can indeed be worked using copper tools and quartz sand. The sand
lies between the tool and the stone block and does the cutting nicely.

Sand is not exactly rare in Egypt.

see Experiments in Egyptian Archaeology: Stoneworking Technology in
Ancient Egypt
Denys A. Stocks

Keith

Jewelers have been cutting stones with hard grit pressed into copper from
Egyptian Dynastic times right up to today:
http://lapidarytool.com/cart/lapidar...ps/cat_75.html
http://www.usfacetersguild.org/artic..._scoring_laps/
http://www.eeescience.utoledo.edu/fa...tones_text.htm

jsw