![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Browne wrote:
On 2011-11-01 19:54 , Ed M. wrote: On Nov 1, 3:21 pm, Alan wrote: That wouldn't fly far - there are only so many viable gold codes - though possibly many more on L5 with its longer code length. There are actually around 500 balanced (roughly equal number of 0s and To avoid x-correlation there are only 35 or so. Don't recall the correct number. I have read a white paper which stated that the number of available Gold codes was (afair) in the 60-70 range. For randomly generated 1023-bit codes we should expect collisions around 32 (sqrt(1024)), but since the codes can be selected by hand, they can get away with approximately twice as many without having problems with cross-correlation, with or without doppler corrections. Several people have noted that you could theoretically get twice as many sats if you set them up in pairs on opposite side of the globe, but since there's no explicit sat nr in the transmitted msg, this won't work with any currently deployed gps receivers. (In theory, as long as the pairs were not exactly opposite, you should be able to determine which hemisphere was the correct one by looking at the residual errors for each of them?) Terje -- - Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 2:47*pm, HIPAR wrote:
Regarding *WDGPS, *I really don't understand who actually controls access to the system. *If NASA operates the core system, what kind of agreement does the US government have with Deere allowing them exclusive commercial marketing rights under the Starfire trademark? NASA/JPL doesn't say much about that. --- *CHAS JPL alludes to commercial opportunities on their site, but don't give specifics of licensing, fees, etc. Clicking on the "Customer Portal" tab yields a certificate error message. http://www.gdgps.net/system-desc/network.html "The core of the GDGPS network is the NASA Global GPS Network (GGN), a JPL-owned and operated network of roughly 70 geodetic-quality, dual frequency receivers, distributed globally. Additional real-time sites are contributed by a variety of U.S. and international partner organizations. The result is the world's largest real-time GPS tracking network, with more than 100 global sites (as of October 2006). All these sites stream their GPS measurements at 1 Hz to the GDGPS Operation Centers (GOCs), where it is processed and analyzed in real-time. .. . . The GDGPS system is proud to count 4 national timing laboratories among it contributing network partners. In particular, the United States Naval Observatory (USNO) contributes two monitoring sites driven by its Master Clock, allowing the GDGPS System to provide its global users the most accurate real-time realization of USNO UTC. .. . . We continue to expand our network, and welcome contributions from interested organizations. We offer our network partners a variety of benefits, including real-time positioning, timing, and environmental monitoring, as well as data archiving and data distribution through the NASA CDDIS facility." http://www.gdgps.net/applications/index.html "The GDGPS System produces differential corrections to the GPS broadcast ephemeris with unparelleled accuracy and seamless global validity. Various GDGPS technology components and data products are being used by nearly all of the providers of premium global differential corrections. The underlying software and algorithms are being used by the FAA's Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), and its Japanese counterpart, MSAS. " http://www.gdgps.net/system-desc/references.html Kevin Dixon, "StarFi A Global SBAS for Sub-Decimeter Precise Point Positioning," ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, TX, September 2006, http://www.gdgps.net/system-desc/papers/starfire.pdf "The central processing hubs are based upon a version of the Real Time GIPSY (RTG) suite, originally developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for precise real time orbit and clock determination of GNSS. This has been refined to optimize positioning accuracy of NavCom developed GNSS hardware. .. . . The StarFire correction stream consists of the RTG generated GNSS precise orbit and clock values differenced with respect to the GNSS broadcast ephemeris. , , , The RTG code is the latest state of the art implementation from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory." More on RTG: http://gipsy.jpl.nasa.gov/igdg/system/od/index.html Some older publications imply that JPL and NavCom (or John Deere -- think they were spun off once, then brought back) may have had a joint venture at one time. The world map in this 2004 paper shows roughly equal number of JPL and NavCom reference stations (NavCom in green, the John Deere color): http://www.gmat.unsw.edu.au/wang/jgp...2/v3n12p19.pdf This 2001 NavCom press release (reprinted in GPS World) describes a joint ventu http://www.navcomtech.com/News/PressReleases.cfm?id=8 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Galaxy XV / PRN 135 geo arrives at 133.1W, WAAS ranging back to 7.5meter UDRE | macpacheco | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | April 6th 11 07:17 PM |
Precision Airmotive LLC | Jerry Springer | Home Built | 53 | November 11th 07 08:41 PM |
Some IFR GPS's no longer useable | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 28th 07 02:27 AM |
Non-precision approach without a published MAP? | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | August 1st 06 08:09 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |