![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 11:01*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:32:32 AM UTC-5, Bill D wrote: Well, good luck with that. Unfortunately or fortunately, depending on your preferences, there's another glider competition system with no equipment limitations - OLC - and pilots seem to like it. I think a bigger problem for rule makers is convincing OLC pilots to try sanctioned contests. *If they have to remove their beloved gadgets to participate, that makes it harder. That's not to say sanctioned contest rules shouldn't restrict technology - they should, but wisely and only to maintain a level playing field. Bill, you are mixing apples and oranges. *OLC, while a contest, is not (and never has been, or ever will be) a RACE. A contest can have very simple rules ("go as far as you can in a glider").. But if I show up in a Concordia, and you show up in a 1-26, we are not racing. A race, to be fair and interesting, has to have tight rules. There is plenty of room for both in our sport, as the two activities are not mutually exclusive. I do fail to see the problem with restrictive rules in racing. If you want to race, read and comply with the rules, then have fun. *It's as simple as that. Really. Kirk 66 I have a deep respect for the RC and the pilots who fly under their rules. I will always remain a fan of sanctioned contests. I've made my point more strongly than I intended so I exit this thread. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 10:01*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:32:32 AM UTC-5, Bill D wrote: Well, good luck with that. Unfortunately or fortunately, depending on your preferences, there's another glider competition system with no equipment limitations - OLC - and pilots seem to like it. I think a bigger problem for rule makers is convincing OLC pilots to try sanctioned contests. *If they have to remove their beloved gadgets to participate, that makes it harder. That's not to say sanctioned contest rules shouldn't restrict technology - they should, but wisely and only to maintain a level playing field. Bill, you are mixing apples and oranges. *OLC, while a contest, is not (and never has been, or ever will be) a RACE. A contest can have very simple rules ("go as far as you can in a glider").. But if I show up in a Concordia, and you show up in a 1-26, we are not racing. A race, to be fair and interesting, has to have tight rules. There is plenty of room for both in our sport, as the two activities are not mutually exclusive. I do fail to see the problem with restrictive rules in racing. If you want to race, read and comply with the rules, then have fun. *It's as simple as that. Really. Kirk 66 Kirk, I would like to suggest that while OLC may not be a "sanctioned" race, it is still a race: it is a race against the weather, the conditions, the amount of daylight and most importantly, it is a race against your fellow pilots flying together on that day. While true, OLC pilots will never reach the same first name only notoriety that "racing" pilots enjoy, to say we don't race isn't really accurate. Regards, Brad |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R9N Logan Competition | Ron Gleason | Soaring | 1 | July 20th 10 08:12 PM |
304S in competition again | Tim Mara | Soaring | 7 | July 25th 08 06:41 PM |
See You Competition | Mal[_4_] | Soaring | 0 | August 14th 07 01:56 PM |
Satellite wx competition | john smith | Piloting | 0 | February 10th 06 02:03 AM |
Competition I.D. | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 22 | December 17th 03 12:22 AM |