A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

X-43A successful flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old April 2nd 04, 10:56 PM
Rich Ahrens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...

On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:


I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.


It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...



Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an F/A-18
pilot.


You did?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rich Ahrens | Homepage:
http://www.visi.com/~rma/ |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|"In a world full of people only some want to fly - isn't that crazy?" |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #4  
Old April 2nd 04, 05:19 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"monkey" wrote in message
om...


Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


And you were completely wrong while exposing yourself as either an
incompetent, or a liar. There is an entire group of frauds at ada you can
join and obsess to your heart's content, sock.


  #5  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:32 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message
om...


Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


And you were completely wrong while exposing yourself as either an
incompetent, or a liar. There is an entire group of frauds at ada you can
join and obsess to your heart's content, sock.


and john, you are completely wrong about everything. no one would
even take your word on the time of day, you would get that completely
arse about face too.

after all john you are the biggest fraud on ADA, you claim so much
knowledge and you didnt even know what Part 25 pertained to.

you also claim that "Total" and "Average" are interchangable terms,

you also claim that budweiser is the biggest selling beer in oz,

you also claim a spoiler is flap,

you claim a spoiler is a wing,

you claim that Pitot tubes are not istalled on aircraft as it would be
unsafe to put a mud bee home on aircraft,

you claim that Pitot is the frech word for tube,

and i personally love this one for absloute ****ing jibberish:

"Retarding the throttles will cease the engines from adding thrust, my
silly
rodent. Reducing pilot workload gives the Operator more time to
deploy
Spoiler Flaps into a Speed Brake configuration."


yep John, you are the king of wrong.
  #6  
Old April 2nd 04, 06:08 AM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."


When I looked at "F/A-18 and HARV Data" in
http://www10.pair.com/jsalvati/resources.htm, though, I found 11 documents
listed. In a search for "Tarver" in each one of them, I found:

"No occurrences of:

Tarver

were found in the document."


In a search for "Tarver in documents containing "HARV" at
http://www2.cemr.wvu.edu/~wwwflt/new_page_3.htm, there were 0 hits.

[Note: Lest you think the search was faulty, I DID find a reference to the
"Jack Tarver Library Gallery" and "Mercer Aims High with NASA Research" and "The
high aspect ratio vessel, or HARV" in an issue of the Mercer University (GA)
newspaper at http://www.mercer.edu/publications/I...er/Nov2000.pdf in that same
search.]


That would be very upsetting if I were expecting the "designer" of HARV to be
acknowledged in ANY of the documents available on-line, and if I expected that
designer to be John Tarver.


  #7  
Old April 2nd 04, 04:02 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:Sy6bc.54251$gA5.707204@attbi_s03...
"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."


Yep, Dryden even went so far as to claim a co-op named Foster designed their
F/A-18 simulator in NASA Tech Briefs. The little cock sucker Foster
designed a fish scale the year Martha Evans and I backed out the F/A-18
flight control computer. The simulator is identical to the copy at Pax
River made from Hornet #3. Shafer remined in denial as the Government
eliminated her and her husband's civil service slots right trough the time
Dryden had their $40 million in Tarver rain pulled. FAA enjoys about $1
billion in Tarver rain today, so they won't be attempting to discredit me
like the idiots of Dryden. Well actually, with all the layoffs Dryden will
have another 150 civil servants out in December to go with the 100
contractors and 20 civil servants this fiscal year the dead wood may be
purged.

Besides that Weiss dip****, nothing in your post changes how the stick in
the F/A-18 works,


  #8  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:41 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:Sy6bc.54251$gA5.707204@attbi_s03...
"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."


Snip

Shafer remined in denial as the Government
eliminated her and her husband's civil service slots right trough the time
Dryden had their $40 million in Tarver rain pulled.


bwahahahhahhahahahhahahhahhahahahhahhahahahhahahha hahhahahahhahhahhahahahhah

FAA enjoys about $1
billion in Tarver rain today, so they won't be attempting to discredit me
like the idiots of Dryden.


bwahahhahahhahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahhahhahhaha hahhahhaahhahhahhahahhahahah

small children in Cameroon discredit you. little old ladies in Boca
let their poodles out to do a "Tarver" in the back yard.
  #9  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:37 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:Sy6bc.54251$gA5.707204@attbi_s03...
"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.


Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."


When I looked at "F/A-18 and HARV Data" in
http://www10.pair.com/jsalvati/resources.htm, though, I found 11 documents
listed. In a search for "Tarver" in each one of them, I found:

"No occurrences of:

Tarver

were found in the document."


In a search for "Tarver in documents containing "HARV" at
http://www2.cemr.wvu.edu/~wwwflt/new_page_3.htm, there were 0 hits.

[Note: Lest you think the search was faulty, I DID find a reference to the
"Jack Tarver Library Gallery" and "Mercer Aims High with NASA Research" and "The
high aspect ratio vessel, or HARV" in an issue of the Mercer University (GA)
newspaper at http://www.mercer.edu/publications/I...er/Nov2000.pdf in that same
search.]


That would be very upsetting if I were expecting the "designer" of HARV to be
acknowledged in ANY of the documents available on-line, and if I expected that
designer to be John Tarver.



you see you you need to use the use following boolean to search on Tarver,

Quote "Tarver"+"Utter Crap" EndQuote

alternatively, use these :

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~phil...FAQ_tarver.htm

http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html

http://www.blippie.org.uk/mazor_explains_splaps.htm
  #10  
Old April 1st 04, 05:53 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never

wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions

admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or

ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,

until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive

troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google

search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such

a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"

into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.


Apologize for what?


You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.


then splaps boy, by similarity you should not only be apologizing to
humanity, but flagellating yourself with stinging nettles.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
100 years of flight - Special coverage by The Cincinnati Enquirer Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 1 March 14th 04 02:42 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
Sim time loggable? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 6th 03 07:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.