Why no Cannons on Police Helicopters?

(miso) wrote in
om:

I know exactly what I am talking about. The NRA types need to diss the
police to justify their need for weapons.

No,we realize that the police are not always around to protect us,so it
falls to ourselves to do so,and we want the best tools for the job.
Clue;the 2nd Amendment is NOT about hunting or "sporting purposes".

You still don't know what you're talking about.

They do it all the time. It
makes the sane gun owners look bad. GOA types are worse. [GOA = Gone
On Arrival]

Jim Yanik wrote in message
...
(miso) wrote in
om:

It never fails. Those who spit on the cops are members of the NRA
or GOA.

That's hilarious,considering the NRA -runs- many police training
programs,and many police are NRA members.
IOW,you don't know what you're talking about.


iespam (N329DF) wrote in message
...
Wouldnt a cannon on a police helicopter solve a lot of
problems for law enforcement?


Let's see, the average cop on the street can't hit a thing with a
side arm unless he fires 10+ shots, and you want to give them a
cannon ?
Matt Gunsch,
A&P,IA,Private Pilot
Riding member of the
2003 world champion drill team
Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team
GWRRA,NRA,GOA





--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

Come on, you know the 2nd amendment refers to a state militia. What
part of "well regulated" don't you understand.

Getting back to the Gone On Arrival dude, he made a blanket statement
that cops can't shoot. Read it and enjoy the odor of the company. He
hates cops, pure and simple, and that attitude is very common in the
NRA and Gone On Arrival crowd.

Jim Yanik wrote in message ...
(miso) wrote in
om:

I know exactly what I am talking about. The NRA types need to diss the
police to justify their need for weapons.

No,we realize that the police are not always around to protect us,so it
falls to ourselves to do so,and we want the best tools for the job.
Clue;the 2nd Amendment is NOT about hunting or "sporting purposes".

You still don't know what you're talking about.

They do it all the time. It
makes the sane gun owners look bad. GOA types are worse. [GOA = Gone
On Arrival]

Jim Yanik wrote in message
...
(miso) wrote in
om:

It never fails. Those who spit on the cops are members of the NRA
or GOA.

That's hilarious,considering the NRA -runs- many police training
programs,and many police are NRA members.
IOW,you don't know what you're talking about.


iespam (N329DF) wrote in message
...
Wouldnt a cannon on a police helicopter solve a lot of
problems for law enforcement?


Let's see, the average cop on the street can't hit a thing with a
side arm unless he fires 10+ shots, and you want to give them a
cannon ?
Matt Gunsch,
A&P,IA,Private Pilot
Riding member of the
2003 world champion drill team
Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team
GWRRA,NRA,GOA

(miso) wrote in
om:

Come on, you know the 2nd amendment refers to a state militia. What
part of "well regulated" don't you understand.

And just WHAT does it say about that "well-regulated militia"? That it's
necessary to a free state,NOTHING more.It does not require membership in
any militia to keep or bear arms. And it goes on to state that the RIGHT is
"of the PEOPLE",not a militia.Learn to read.
Further,most of the Founders writings indicated that they intended that
every free man be armed.(if they choose)

Getting back to the Gone On Arrival dude, he made a blanket statement
that cops can't shoot. Read it and enjoy the odor of the company. He
hates cops, pure and simple, and that attitude is very common in the
NRA and Gone On Arrival crowd.

How would you know that's the attitude of the "NRA crowd"?
Did you do a survey? Where's your source for this?
You know nothing about the NRA or what they are for.
I suspect the same goes for GOA and it's members.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

In article ,
(miso) wrote:

Come on, you know the 2nd amendment refers to a state militia.

Nonsense; it refers to "the people", and notes "militia" as one reason
why the people should not be disarmed.

The militia, at the time, was defined as the citizenry in general,
capable of bearing arms for defense of themselves and the state ("state"
being a term of art referrring to a sovereign nation).

What part of "well regulated" don't you understand.

Define it for us.

As used at the time the 2nd was written.

(A timepiece can be "regulated", a shotgun can be "regulated", a
flintlock mechanism can be "regulated". In all cases, adjusted to peform
to a minimum standard.)