![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Brooks wrote:
I was going to fish, I once kicked one out of the brush and watched him scurry away--it was so comical I had to laugh outloud. He was running as hard as he could while repeatedly looking back at me with this obviously terrified look about him, trying to see if I was going to chase him. Danged thing took off up the side of the ridge (a pretty steep one) and I swear he was accelerating the whole time. Made me realize if I ever did encounter one who was testy that outrunning him is *not* an option. Well thanks for the update. Need to look into this more. We've had several local "lectures" from state wildlife biologists about the bears (which have become very frequent visitors to most Northampton neighborhoods; they hit the bird feeders and trash cans). They always emphasize the lack of aggressiveness of the black bear (as opposed to the grizzly). I think much of it has to do with the political thinking of this area. Hunters are very bad (their trucks commonly have sugar poured into gas tanks during deer season), as of course guns (did you know a gun is "an instrument of violence"?). There is the promotion of the idea that animals are our friends and only humans are the real aggressive creatures. I think the "gentle Bambi" side of wildlife is emphasized at the expense of reality. Needless to say, I have not been too concerned encountering bears in the woods, but am quite convinced there is going to be "an incident" in town some day as someone runs into a bear who has become habituated to humans. A couple years ago, I was visiting a friend at the edge of town as a bear hit trash cans left out by an unthinking tenent. Myself, with infuriated dog (on leash) and 6 other people stood and watched this bear go through the trash cans not much more than 30 yards away. He totally ignored our presence, or the near hysterical dog trying to commence a chase. *That* is potentially a dangerous bear! Guess it's time to walk a bit more softly (or perhaps more noisily) over the trails now that I have some alternative info on the beast. SMH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... snip I think much of it has to do with the political thinking of this area. Hunters are very bad (their trucks commonly have sugar poured into gas tanks during deer season), as of course guns (did you know a gun is "an instrument of violence"?). Yeah, folks just don't seem to understand that predation is supposed to be a natural process, and we have removed some of the predators from the chain; unless hunters fill the void, you get population explosions in not-so-comfortable places and attendant problems. ISTR Long Island, among other northeastern communities, has been having a heck of a problem with deer, but every time a regulated hunt or thinning program is proposed, the PETA weenies come out of the woodwork. It would not be so bad if the critters were *just* eating up folks ornamentals in their yards, but we are experiencing fatalities; there have been at least two fatalities due to hitting deer on the road in my local area over the past three or four years, and about fifteen years ago I lost an uncle when an oncoming car hit a deer, tossed it up into the air, and sent it through the windshield of the car he was traveling in. There is the promotion of the idea that animals are our friends and only humans are the real aggressive creatures. I think the "gentle Bambi" side of wildlife is emphasized at the expense of reality. Talk about Bambi...every year we have one or two accounts in the state of *deer* attacking folks during the rutting season. Haven't heard of any fatalities recently, but a couple of folks were pretty badly injured. Folks always think "oh, how cute" and forget they are wild animals and can tear you up pretty good. Needless to say, I have not been too concerned encountering bears in the woods, but am quite convinced there is going to be "an incident" in town some day as someone runs into a bear who has become habituated to humans. Those are the ones to worry most about. I was always taught to stay away from bears near any parks, and *all* sows and cubs. The first because of the likelihood of them having lost their natural fear of us, the second because they are extremely defensive of their young. A couple years ago, I was visiting a friend at the edge of town as a bear hit trash cans left out by an unthinking tenent. Myself, with infuriated dog (on leash) and 6 other people stood and watched this bear go through the trash cans not much more than 30 yards away. He totally ignored our presence, or the near hysterical dog trying to commence a chase. *That* is potentially a dangerous bear! Guess it's time to walk a bit more softly (or perhaps more noisily) over the trails now that I have some alternative info on the beast. Interestingly, when looking for the bear attack statistics I ran across a reference to those "bear bells" that some folks wear when hiking. Seems some researchers tied some to a bush and jingled them as grizzlies strolled by, and got absolutely *no* response from the bears, other than curiousity (which is not the reaction I would want to engender in any grizzly I might meet when fishing in Montana or Wyoming). The noise thing may be another "doesn't really work, or works counter to the desired result" item, like that "play dead when dealing with a grizzly" bit. Brooks SMH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
... I think much of it has to do with the political thinking of this area. Hunters are very bad (their trucks commonly have sugar poured into gas tanks during deer season), as of course guns (did you know a gun is "an instrument of violence"?). Of course they are, they're designed to kill with. Doesn't mean they're *bad*, but a firearm is primarily designed to blow holes in targets, and those targets may be cute fluffy living creatures just as easily as cardboard cutouts or metallic silhouettes. There is the promotion of the idea that animals are our friends and only humans are the real aggressive creatures. I think the "gentle Bambi" side of wildlife is emphasized at the expense of reality. Ouch. Without hunting or some other means of culling, Bambi is going to breed like mad, eat the pristine wilderness into a barren waste, and then starve en masse (of course all that will probably be the fault of hunters, the government, large corporations and/or Saddam Hussein rather than the sentimental well-meaning treehuggers). Okay, over-hunting is also very bad, as the passenger pigeon would tell you, but while Nature usually works out a balance it can be quite messy for a few generations while the scales swing. -- Paul J. Adam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:42:31 -0400, Stephen Harding
wrote: There is the promotion of the idea that animals are our friends and only humans are the real aggressive creatures. I think the "gentle Bambi" side of wildlife is emphasized at the expense of reality. Forget bears; I know someone whose cousin was killed by a mule deer. Not in a collision between deer and car, but in a face-to-face encounter. I suspect that more people are killed or injured in such collisions with deer than are killed or injured by bears (black, grizzly, and polar) every year. The closest I've ever come to being attacked by a wild animal is being nipped by a rock hyrax on Table Mountain, though. Hyraxes are the closest living relatives of elephants, not that you'd guess that by looking at either of them. Although now that I think about elephants, there was that one bull elephant who seriously considered charging our vehicle in Samburu (or was it Masai Mara?) a few years ago. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Shafer wrote:
The closest I've ever come to being attacked by a wild animal is being nipped by a rock hyrax on Table Mountain, though. Hyraxes are the closest living relatives of elephants, not that you'd guess that by looking at either of them. Although now that I think about elephants, there was that one bull elephant who seriously considered charging our vehicle in Samburu (or was it Masai Mara?) a few years ago. Hyraxes? Elephants? Phaah! Ever been to Rocky Mountain Nat'l Park in Colorado? That's the site of my only "wildlife attack". A vicious and highly aggressive pack of ground squirrels! The little buggers would come right up under the picnic table at the campsite, and nip at your toes. The message was for us to get out so they could move in on the chips and fritos for themselves. Such a terrifying experience, I have never returned! SMH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stephen Harding writes: Kevin Brooks wrote: The ol' Black Bear actually accounts for many more attacks against humans in the US than does the Grizzly, which makes sense being as they are more widely distributed and have a larger population. I carried a 12 guage pump Are you certain of that? I've read quite consistently that the black bear is really very slow to attack a human, even when it has cubs. Attacks are extremely rare. I think the last I heard, a couple years ago a woman jogging around somewhere in Quebec was killed by a black bear. It was an exceptional event! I guess I should find out more. We've got *plenty* of black bears around here, and they're definitely done with their winter naps. Had my first encounter with one for this year just a few days ago. It growled at my dog, made a short charge towards the dog, and then took off. This would be my 5th encounter with local black bears in about 3 years, and usually, they just skeedadle as fast as possible when they see me. The critters are *everywhere* around here now days! I haven't heard any credible stories of Black Bear attacks either. They're pretty willing to just go about their business and amble along. I think that the Bears (and us) face more danger from the Charging Buick than anything else. That being said, wo do have a lot of bear up here, these days. (IIRC, the census figures put the bear population in New England at the highest level since about 1600. Hmm. given the number of bear sighting out to Durham, it could well be that bears are attracted to Academic environments. I know Skunks are - there's an area of UNH that's just loaded with them. And teh City-raised kids learn pretty quickly that they all respond quite well to "Here, Kitty!" As it happens, I'll be meeting with some of teh Wildlife Studies folks at UNH this weekend. I'll see what they think. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
Hmm. given the number of bear sighting out to Durham, it could well be that bears are attracted to Academic environments. I know Skunks are - there's an area of UNH that's just loaded with them. And teh City-raised kids learn pretty quickly that they all respond quite well to "Here, Kitty!" As it happens, I'll be meeting with some of teh Wildlife Studies folks at UNH this weekend. I'll see what they think. My brother works as a cop at Amherst College and he's always getting wildlife complaints over there. Get the skunk out of the dining common; a fox was seen wandering around the library; moose in a parking lot! However one parents weekend, with the college attempting to look its best (this is generally a well-to-do population), he got a report that a red tailed hawk plucked a squirrel right off the lawn in front of students and parents, carrying it struggling away, most likely to become baby hawk food. The parents and students wanted the police to do something about it! Since Amherst and my own fair town of Northampton are official "No Nuke" zones, and there haven't been any nuclear events, even with Westover RAFB not too distant, perhaps a "No Predation" zone would be useful. SMH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stephen Harding wrote: My brother works as a cop at Amherst College and he's always getting wildlife complaints over there. Get the skunk out of the dining common; a fox was seen wandering around the library; moose in a parking lot! However one parents weekend, with the college attempting to look its best (this is generally a well-to-do population), he got a report that a red tailed hawk plucked a squirrel right off the lawn in front of students and parents, carrying it struggling away, most likely to become baby hawk food. The parents and students wanted the police to do something about it! Figures. Since Amherst and my own fair town of Northampton are official "No Nuke" zones, and there haven't been any nuclear events, even with Westover RAFB not too distant, perhaps a "No Predation" zone would be useful. It should work just about as well. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Stickney" wrote in message ... In article , Stephen Harding writes: Kevin Brooks wrote: The ol' Black Bear actually accounts for many more attacks against humans in the US than does the Grizzly, which makes sense being as they are more widely distributed and have a larger population. I carried a 12 guage pump Are you certain of that? I've read quite consistently that the black bear is really very slow to attack a human, even when it has cubs. Attacks are extremely rare. I think the last I heard, a couple years ago a woman jogging around somewhere in Quebec was killed by a black bear. It was an exceptional event! I guess I should find out more. We've got *plenty* of black bears around here, and they're definitely done with their winter naps. Had my first encounter with one for this year just a few days ago. It growled at my dog, made a short charge towards the dog, and then took off. This would be my 5th encounter with local black bears in about 3 years, and usually, they just skeedadle as fast as possible when they see me. The critters are *everywhere* around here now days! I haven't heard any credible stories of Black Bear attacks either. Then you may want to reread what is available out there. A quick Google should convince you that the black is no teddy bear; they have accounted for a number of fatalities, and reportedly account for more attacks and fatalities in BC than the also-present grizzlies. They're pretty willing to just go about their business and amble along. I think that the Bears (and us) face more danger from the Charging Buick than anything else. That being said, wo do have a lot of bear up here, these days. (IIRC, the census figures put the bear population in New England at the highest level since about 1600. Hmm. given the number of bear sighting out to Durham, it could well be that bears are attracted to Academic environments. I know Skunks are - there's an area of UNH that's just loaded with them. And teh City-raised kids learn pretty quickly that they all respond quite well to "Here, Kitty!" As it happens, I'll be meeting with some of teh Wildlife Studies folks at UNH this weekend. I'll see what they think. Ask them if any of them have read Shelton's book on the subject of black bears and attacks. Brooks -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Kevin Brooks" writes: "Peter Stickney" wrote in message ... In article , Stephen Harding writes: Kevin Brooks wrote: The ol' Black Bear actually accounts for many more attacks against humans in the US than does the Grizzly, which makes sense being as they are more widely distributed and have a larger population. I carried a 12 guage pump Are you certain of that? I've read quite consistently that the black bear is really very slow to attack a human, even when it has cubs. Attacks are extremely rare. I think the last I heard, a couple years ago a woman jogging around somewhere in Quebec was killed by a black bear. It was an exceptional event! I guess I should find out more. We've got *plenty* of black bears around here, and they're definitely done with their winter naps. Had my first encounter with one for this year just a few days ago. It growled at my dog, made a short charge towards the dog, and then took off. This would be my 5th encounter with local black bears in about 3 years, and usually, they just skeedadle as fast as possible when they see me. The critters are *everywhere* around here now days! I haven't heard any credible stories of Black Bear attacks either. Then you may want to reread what is available out there. A quick Google should convince you that the black is no teddy bear; they have accounted for a number of fatalities, and reportedly account for more attacks and fatalities in BC than the also-present grizzlies. I'd be the last one to state that _any_ wild critter, be it a bear, of any color, Coyote, Racoon, or even Field Mouse is a Cuddly Teddy Bear. (Especially after sewing a friend's Coon Hound's ears back on after it learned that Black Bears are Very Much Irritated by Coon Hounds bouncing around them and bellowing. (It wasn't so much an attack as a backhand cuff in the "Get Outta Here!" mode. It was still sufficient to scalp the dog. (Didn't do any permanent damage though, 'cause it hit him in hte head. The one thing you could be certain of was that you couldn't induce detectable Brain Damage in Bounce the Coon Hound - It's sort of like detectnig radiation from DU - sure, it's there, but the background count is so high that you can't sort out just what the cause is)) I don't doubt that there have been Black Bear attacks. We haven't had any of any consequence in New Hampshire, of late. Given what I've observed of bears in the woods. I'd be willing to wager that it's more a question of the likelyhood of an encounter with a particular species rather than a blanket statement that a Black Bear is as agressive, or as prone to provocation, as a Grizzly. I wouldn't dream of cornering either type - other than Humans, they're at the toop of the food chain around here, and they didn't get there by being slow, dull-witted vegetarians. They're pretty willing to just go about their business and amble along. I think that the Bears (and us) face more danger from the Charging Buick than anything else. That being said, wo do have a lot of bear up here, these days. (IIRC, the census figures put the bear population in New England at the highest level since about 1600. Hmm. given the number of bear sighting out to Durham, it could well be that bears are attracted to Academic environments. I know Skunks are - there's an area of UNH that's just loaded with them. And teh City-raised kids learn pretty quickly that they all respond quite well to "Here, Kitty!" As it happens, I'll be meeting with some of teh Wildlife Studies folks at UNH this weekend. I'll see what they think. Ask them if any of them have read Shelton's book on the subject of black bears and attacks. I wouldn't doubt that they have - in fact, some of them may have contributed or reviewed it. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 10th 04 11:06 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Air Force announces acquisition management reorganization | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 21st 03 09:16 PM |