![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My turn.
Coming back from "out west" to Chicago with trailer in tow, I also had a PTT a.k.a. premature termination of towing-the-trailer. I was in mid-town Omaha, in four lanes of rush hour traffic. AND THEN BANG! It really didn't occur to me until later, as I only had time to react, that the trailer had departed the ball. All I knew was that SOEMTHING WAS WRONG! I heard bang-pause-bang-pause and the truck being pulled side to side. My mate was in the lead and told me later that in his rear view mirror the trailer was seen repeatedly going to the left and right of my truck - basically it kept trying to change lanes - and cars dodging my trailer to get out of the way. Luckily I was not in a middle lane or crossing a bridge as something would have been hit. I was in the left lane ("fast" lane for you UK-ers), came off the gas with very light braking and successfully got the trailer off to the side. We quickly got the trailer back on the ball and just as quickly got off the highway. The cause of this mayhem was found to be a newly installed coupling in which the part the latches under the ball wasn't tight enough. I had hit (I don't remember this) a series of bumps that had dislodged the coupler. Note that this was after driving from Chicago to Utah and half the way back. The only real damage (aside from excessive adrenalin and mucho pride) was the missing - i.e. torn off at the root - trailer lights wiring. We were back on the road within 60 minutes. Good to have spare parts. And good that my chains were crossed ... fingers too for the rest of the way home. - John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 7:14:14 PM UTC-4, JohnDeRosa wrote:
My mate was in the lead and told me later that in his rear view mirror the trailer was seen repeatedly going to the left and right of my truck - basically it kept trying to change lanes - and cars dodging my trailer to get out of the way. Gotta tow my trailer next week, so this topic has got me thinking. I buy that crossed chains are better, but it strikes me that crossed chains are not symmetrical and that the dismounted trailer will probably not track stable and straight (as John recounts). I wonder if it might work better to join the left and right chains with a perpendicular link under the hitch to achieve symmetry? Picture an H-shape chain arrangement. I think I will experiment and see how my trailer tows/drags on just the chains (slowly and in a parking lot). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
son_of_flubber wrote, On 5/3/2014 8:18 PM:
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 7:14:14 PM UTC-4, JohnDeRosa wrote: My mate was in the lead and told me later that in his rear view mirror the trailer was seen repeatedly going to the left and right of my truck - basically it kept trying to change lanes - and cars dodging my trailer to get out of the way. Gotta tow my trailer next week, so this topic has got me thinking. I buy that crossed chains are better, but it strikes me that crossed chains are not symmetrical and that the dismounted trailer will probably not track stable and straight (as John recounts). I wonder if it might work better to join the left and right chains with a perpendicular link under the hitch to achieve symmetry? Picture an H-shape chain arrangement. I think I will experiment and see how my trailer tows/drags on just the chains (slowly and in a parking lot). I doubt that would make any difference. The huge problem is the trailer is no longer connected to the ball, and it's the ball that constrains the tongue so following directly behind the tow vehicle. With the tongue free to move side to side and steer the trailer, the dynamics are very different. My guess: cross the chains, and shorten them as much as possible. Even better, also do this: every time you hook up, carefully check the ball and it's attachment, check the coupler for proper functioning, and connect the chains and lights. And then double-check. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "son_of_flubber" wrote in message ... On Saturday, May 3, 2014 7:14:14 PM UTC-4, JohnDeRosa wrote: My mate was in the lead and told me later that in his rear view mirror the trailer was seen repeatedly going to the left and right of my truck - basically it kept trying to change lanes - and cars dodging my trailer to get out of the way. Gotta tow my trailer next week, so this topic has got me thinking. I buy that crossed chains are better, but it strikes me that crossed chains are not symmetrical and that the dismounted trailer will probably not track stable and straight (as John recounts). I wonder if it might work better to join the left and right chains with a perpendicular link under the hitch to achieve symmetry? Picture an H-shape chain arrangement. I think I will experiment and see how my trailer tows/drags on just the chains (slowly and in a parking lot). You will find your right side chains tight as crap when making a left hand turn. Don't do it. Crossing them is the ONLY way to go. -- Jim in NC --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, May 2, 2014 3:21:47 PM UTC-7, JohnDeRosa wrote:
I have been told that crossing your trailer safety chains is the right thing to do. Something about if the coupler comes off the ball, the trailer will be limited in its wayward travel. Sounds like something for Mythbusters to figure out. Yes or no, what say you? I don't see how this discussion makes any sense unless it is stated where each end of each chain is attached. Cobra trailers are delivered to USA with no chains. They only have the standard European emergency brake actuating cable. When I picked up my new glider from the port I took a length of chain. I attached each end of it to each of the bolts that secure the tongue to the trailer floor (redundant attachment to trailer). The front end of the loop is hooked up to one of the tow bar chain eyes with a screw gate link when towing (single point failure). The chain is routed over the top of the trailer jacking wheel attach bracket so it does not drag on the road. My glider was received shortly after the rash of tow tongue failure reports in USA so I knew the chains had to be attached to the trailer body and not to the tongue itself. The distance between the trailer axle and the chain attach points is so long on a glider trailer that I doubt it makes any difference to unhook stability exactly where they are attached or whether they are crossed. May be a different story for a short trailer. Andy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have exactly the same setup on my 2000 Cobra. What I do is route the chains coming from the eye-hooks on the trailer through the triangular skid on the bottom of the tow bar, then they go on to the hitch eyes. This crosses the chains, and shortens them enough that that don't drag on the road. As with yourself, I have no idea what will happen if the hitch comes off of the ball.
-John, Q3 On Sunday, May 4, 2014 10:12:16 AM UTC-4, Andy wrote: I don't see how this discussion makes any sense unless it is stated where each end of each chain is attached. Cobra trailers are delivered to USA with no chains. They only have the standard European emergency brake actuating cable. When I picked up my new glider from the port I took a length of chain. I attached each end of it to each of the bolts that secure the tongue to the trailer floor (redundant attachment to trailer). The front end of the loop is hooked up to one of the tow bar chain eyes with a screw gate link when towing (single point failure). The chain is routed over the top of the trailer jacking wheel attach bracket so it does not drag on the road. My glider was received shortly after the rash of tow tongue failure reports in USA so I knew the chains had to be attached to the trailer body and not to the tongue itself. The distance between the trailer axle and the chain attach points is so long on a glider trailer that I doubt it makes any difference to unhook stability exactly where they are attached or whether they are crossed. May be a different story for a short trailer. Andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 10:12:16 AM UTC-4, Andy wrote:
I attached each end of (the chain) to each of the bolts that secure the tongue to the trailer floor (redundant attachment to trailer). The front end of the loop is hooked up to one of the tow bar chain eyes with a screw gate link when towing (single point failure). The chain is routed over the top of the trailer jacking wheel attach bracket so it does not drag on the road. .. .. .. The distance between the trailer axle and the chain attach points is so long on a glider trailer that I doubt it makes any difference to unhook stability exactly where they are attached or whether they are crossed. Would it be sound to attach the chain to both the trailer floor AND to the front of the tongue? That way the chains might catch a detached tongue AND be redundant for a failed tongue. It might as well keep a completely detached tongue from becoming a hazard to the following traffic. Here's a gob-smacking picture of non-tubular failed hitch (not my hitch) http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f3...r/IMG_1492.jpg It amazes me that this most simple life-critical structural part would not have a bulletproof safety margin. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote, On 5/4/2014 7:12 AM:
On Friday, May 2, 2014 3:21:47 PM UTC-7, JohnDeRosa wrote: I have been told that crossing your trailer safety chains is the right thing to do. Something about if the coupler comes off the ball, the trailer will be limited in its wayward travel. Sounds like something for Mythbusters to figure out. Yes or no, what say you? I don't see how this discussion makes any sense unless it is stated where each end of each chain is attached. Cobra trailers are delivered to USA with no chains. They only have the standard European emergency brake actuating cable. When I picked up my new glider from the port I took a length of chain. I attached each end of it to each of the bolts that secure the tongue to the trailer floor (redundant attachment to trailer). The front end of the loop is hooked up to one of the tow bar chain eyes with a screw gate link when towing (single point failure). The chain is routed over the top of the trailer jacking wheel attach bracket so it does not drag on the road. My glider was received shortly after the rash of tow tongue failure reports in USA so I knew the chains had to be attached to the trailer body and not to the tongue itself. The distance between the trailer axle and the chain attach points is so long on a glider trailer that I doubt it makes any difference to unhook stability exactly where they are attached or whether they are crossed. May be a different story for a short trailer. First, if you think you have a trailer with an inadequate tongue, I think you should replace it with the correct tongue. Cobra, or perhaps a dealer, that tell you what tongue your trailer should have. Replacing it is not hard or expensive. Second, with the chains connected only to the trailer body, a trailer that disconnects from the hitch will be far less stable than if the chains are connected near the coupler. Third, even if you have the chains connected to the trailer body, you can have also have the chains connected at the coupler. There is bolt that holds the coupler to the tongue on my Cobra trailer. I replaced with with a longer, high strength bolt that captures a chain link from one chain on the left side, and a link from the other chain on the right side. I used thick washers between the bolt head (and the bolt nut on the other side) to help retain the link. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 7:40:31 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
First, if you think you have a trailer with an inadequate tongue, I think you should replace it with the correct tongue. Cobra, or perhaps a dealer, that tell you what tongue your trailer should have. Replacing it is not hard or expensive. ***I don't think that. The Cobra tongues that failed were round tube. My trailer has the higher load rated square tube tongue. Second, with the chains connected only to the trailer body, a trailer that disconnects from the hitch will be far less stable than if the chains are connected near the coupler. ****Show me the math. The difference in distance from the axle is insignificant. Ontario ministry of transportation says this about chains "Safety chains should be crossed under the tongue to prevent the tongue from dropping to the road should the primary hitch accidentally disconnect." - Nothing to do with trailer stability. Third, even if you have the chains connected to the trailer body, you can have also have the chains connected at the coupler. Agree, but the only reason for going that is to reduce the amount the trailer will overrun the vehicle when stopping after a disconnect. It won't overrun if the trailer emergency brake activates. That of course leads to a completely different discussion - Why do Americans insist on chains when the trailer designer did not intend them to be used? What is done in other parts of the world? - Rely on automatic emergency trailer brake only, or use chains with or without the safety brake cable hooked up? The following appears to apply in UK - "Unbraked trailers must have a stout secondary coupling, such as a chain, which is connected securely to the towing vehicle when it is being towed. The secondary coupling must be tight enough to prevent the trailer's tow hitch from hitting the ground if the vehicle becomes uncoupled. Braked trailers must be fitted with hydraulically damped coupling and auto reverse brakes to give braking efficiencies required by EEC Directive 71/320. All wheels must be braked. Braked trailers must be fitted with a breakaway cable. This must be attached to the towing vehicle in such a manner so that, should the trailer become detached, the breakaway cable will operate the trailer's brakes." Andy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy" wrote That of course leads to a completely different discussion - Why do Americans insist on chains when the trailer designer did not intend them to be used? Because it is the law in most states. Perhaps all of them. -- Jim in NC --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross country question? How is it done today? | flgliderpilot[_2_] | Soaring | 56 | October 16th 13 02:13 AM |
colour cross section showing the oil path of a pobjoy engine - Pobjoy cross sectional view.jpg | Stealth Pilot[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | June 8th 09 04:13 PM |
First solo cross-country flight completed - question | Bertie the Bunyip[_25_] | Piloting | 19 | March 13th 08 07:17 PM |
a different cross-country time question | Arden Prinz | Piloting | 3 | December 29th 03 01:17 AM |
Got my ticket.... now what (the cross-country question) | bdl | Piloting | 6 | July 13th 03 02:06 AM |