![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have a
rule here in the UK, launch failure on aerotow below 300ft a landing should be made ahead, or slightly to one side. No attempt should be made to turn back below this height. As a UK FI(S) and FIC, previously a Full Cat instructor, this is news to me. Where is it expressed? I thought the rule was to exercise judgement. I always address 'where would you go now' issues with students and on check flights. In most conditions and situations I would turn back from lower than 300 foot. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:41:23 PM UTC-4, Don Johnstone wrote:
While in no way do I wish to speculate on the cause of this accident or indeed suggest that my comments in any way address the cause of this accident. I feel that comment is needed on some of the things said here. We have a rule here in the UK, launch failure on aerotow below 300ft a landing should be made ahead, or slightly to one side. No attempt should be made to turn back below this height. The reason is simple, a controlled crash into difficult terrain is likely to result in a better outcome than an uncontrolled arrival on the airfield. The important bit to keep intact is the bit you are sitting in, the rest of the glider does not really matter too much. The best chance of achieving that is flying to the ground with the wings level. It has only happened to me once, there was a field ahead but it was full of the Tiger Moth tug that had landed in the middle. I discovered that there was just enough space for a Skylark 2 as well. I have no doubt that a turn back would have resulted in an accident. I was at 250ft agl max. If there really is nowhere to land ahead you should really ask the question, "should I be taking a launch". Frankly I would be horrified to be required to conduct a turn back at 200ft, I would suggest that this is one of those occasions where the danger of practice is to great to justify. Sometimes it's hard to face the fact that the glider must be destroyed to survive. Trying to save the device could be a deadly decision. Again, I don't know what actually happened, best guess, inadvertent unintentional release. Whether he tried to turn back, or just plain didn't get the nose down quick enough during a 90 degree or lesser turn, who knows. The only way to practice rope breaks at 100' is on a simulator (condor). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don's suggestion that there is a rigid rule about turn back heights in the UK is a surprise to me (I am an instructor). Select the least bad option at the time. Prepare students for it by (at an earlier stage) saying 'from here I would..'. Later asking 'if the tow fails here, where would you go?'
In most circumstances from 200 foot I would turn back. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parowan Fatal Crash | ContestID67[_2_] | Soaring | 30 | July 3rd 09 03:43 AM |
Rare fatal CH-801 crash | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 8 | June 22nd 09 03:24 AM |
Fatal crash in NW Washington | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 1 | February 17th 08 02:38 AM |
Fatal Crash | Monty | General Aviation | 1 | December 12th 07 09:06 PM |
Fatal Crash in Fittstown, OK | GeorgeC | Piloting | 3 | March 7th 06 05:03 AM |