![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
I agree. This becomes a very subjective debate however I have heard testimonial evidence that people don't fly their aircraft when their FLARM is U/S. Does this suggest that they consider that they have become complacent in look-out following habitual use? or that they consider the risk of mid-air is significantly higher without an early alert system or perhaps they don't want to experience any more 'WTF was that' moments in their enjoyment of the sport. I still standby my comments, until I am provided with evidence, that the risk of mid-air is not significantly reduced with FLARM introduction but it does reduce the number of 'WTF was that' moments. So I accept that as an aid it may make the flight more enjoyable but in this thread I won't comment on the additional threats that alert systems might be adding to comprimising flight safety by incorrect use and distraction. Neil At 13:01 05 August 2014, Chris Rollings wrote: I can't imagine anyone is going to admit to that or even realise it applie to them, at least until they have a mid-air or a very near miss. At 20:35 04 August 2014, John Galloway wrote: It has often been hypothesised that FLARM might cause complacency but no study has found evidence of that. I would be interested to hear from pilots who who have found that FLARM use has made them complacent about look out. John Galloway |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 16:13:43 UTC+1, Neil Goudie wrote:
Chris, I agree. This becomes a very subjective debate however I have heard testimonial evidence that people don't fly their aircraft when their FLARM is U/S. Does this suggest that they consider that they have become complacent in look-out following habitual use? or that they consider the risk of mid-air is significantly higher without an early alert system or perhaps they don't want to experience any more 'WTF was that' moments in their enjoyment of the sport. I still standby my comments, until I am provided with evidence, that the risk of mid-air is not significantly reduced with FLARM introduction but it does reduce the number of 'WTF was that' moments. So I accept that as an aid it may make the flight more enjoyable but in this thread I won't comment on the additional threats that alert systems might be adding to comprimising flight safety by incorrect use and distraction. Neil Neil, I agree that we don't yet know for sure the extent to which FLARM has affected mid-air collision statistics. What we can say for sure IMHO, and with the greatest respect what I think is missing from you comments, is that FLARM has the potential to have significant benefit if its use and limitations are taught and understood properly and, especially, if pilots learn from their experiences of the additional situational awareness information to improve their flying (so as to avoid getting into high risk situations) and also to improve their look out and see and avoid behaviour. It also has the potential to be pretty pointless if pilots just stick it in their glider and expect it to "work" without them having thought through how to interact with it or to learn from it. So - what has resulted so far from FLARM use is much less important than what we could make happen with it in the future. Regrettably structured instruction on FLARM use has not found its way into ab initio training in the UK. John Galloway |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the most recent UK mid-air, the one of which we have been seeing the dramatic photos of the wing parting, happened in a competition thermal gaggle. I find Flarm of little relevance in that situation.
Who would care to suggest a training syllabus for Flarm? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:17 05 August 2014, waremark wrote:
I believe the most recent UK mid-air, the one of which we have been seeing the dramatic photos of the wing parting, happened in a competition thermal gaggle. I find Flarm of little relevance in that situation. ..and another happened in a thermal with two gliders alone. So we conclude FLARM isn't any use in a gaggle, and isn't any use not in a gaggle. So in the context that most mid-airs happen in thermals, when is it useful? Or is it the Emperor's New Clothes? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|