![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the best answer on this thread.
Having flown a turbocharged airplane equipped with TCAS in the teens and low FLs around the west, I missed a lot of aircraft visually that came up In the screen. Flying without it feels like I'm flung blind. --bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the reply to my question from Trig. The TT21 does not comply with ADS-B for the 2020 Mandate.
__________________________________________ Dear Walter, Thank you for your enquiry and for considering Trig. 1. There is no real practical reason to need a TT22, but there is unfortunately a regulatory reason; Our TT21 and TT22 transponders are certified to TSO-C112c and therefore the DO-181D document applies. DO-181D paragraph 1.4.5 states: Two minimum peak output power levels are supported by this version of these MOPS, 125 watt (21.0 dBW), which is designated as Class 1 equipment, and 70 watts (18.5 dBW), which is designated as Class 2 equipment. For more information on output power levels, see §2.2.3.2. Class 1 equipment is intended for use in aircraft that operate at altitudes above 15000 ft, or have a maximum cruising true airspeed in excess of 175 kt (324 km/h). Class 2 equipment may be used in aircraft that operate at altitudes not exceeding 15000 ft, and have a maximum cruising true airspeed not exceeding 175 kt (324 km/h). Given that you are flying above 15,000ft frequently, the Class 1 TT22 would be more suited to your needs. 2. Cost wise, it may vary slightly depending on the supplier, but the TT22 is usually about $200 more expensive. I would agree with you , I do think collision avoidance is worth being involved in. 3. Not a great deal more power consumption for TT22; Typical Consumption (at 14 V) TT21 idle: 0.15 A active: 0.28 A TT22 idle: 0.15A active: 0.34 A 4. To comply with the FAA's 2020 mandate for ADS-B Out a certified Class 1 transponder is required after 2020, so a TT21 would not give a certified ADS-B Out solution. If the FAA decide gliders need to transmit ADS-B out, the TT22 will meet all the requirements. You will need to connect a GPS to the TT22 which provides the positional information and the type of GPS will depend on what the FAA decide is required for gliders. I would therefore conclude that the Trig TT22 would better satisfy your requirements. I hope this is helpful, but if you have any further questions please do not hesitate to ask. Bruce Grammon Trig Avionics Technical Support Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics 9400 E. 34th Street North Wichita, KS 67226 (800) 821-1212 ph (316) 630-0723 fx www.mcico.com www.trig-avionics.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 Transponder ... reports? | Grider Pirate | Soaring | 105 | March 29th 18 01:10 AM |
Trig TT21 transponder for sale | Dave Springford | Soaring | 15 | September 7th 12 11:05 PM |
Trig TT21 transponder draws only 125 mA! | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 10 09:59 PM |
New Trig TT22 Transponder | Paul Remde | Soaring | 1 | January 14th 10 07:27 PM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |