A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is FLARM helpful?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th 15, 04:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Is FLARM helpful?

On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 7:45:09 AM UTC-8, James Metcalfe wrote:
At 03:22 27 November 2015, jfitch wrote:
James, if you are plagued by false alarms coming even from

the wrong
heading, I am all the more curious. I have not had any false

alarms, perhaps
some false negatives (probably should had been an alarm).

Never from the wrong
direction. Do you have the IGC files from a flight in which you

remember
that happening? It would be interesting to put it into SeeYou or

other
software (or even look at it in a text editor) to see what the

accuracy of fix
was. I have noticed that the Flarm GPS is typically reporting a

larger
error, and in some cases quite large. I'm not sure what the

algorithms do with
the precision of fix, but it seems like that is the most likely

source of
the errors you describe. For example the Flarm IGC file from

my glider will
show a typical precision of fix of around 3 - 4 meters, but

sometimes it
will go up to 30-40 for unknown reasons. The Air Avionics gps

will show a
precision of 1 - 2 meters on the same flight and might also go

up in the same
areas but not as much. Ridge flying in the Alps you might have

the antenna
shaded on one or more sides, which will increase the HDOP.

The precision is
the normally the last three digits of the B record in the IGC

file. All of
my flying is high altitude and with a clear view of the sky.


Others have now posted in more detail on the track vs. heading
errors of Flarm. These are inevitable (until wind information is
available to Flarm), and not (I'm confident) a problem with any
of the 3 installations which I have used. I'm afraid I have not
kept a log of the various incidents to which I have referred, nor
do I have the IGC files.

It seems to me that you yourself have provided the explanation
of the differences in our experiences of Flarm:
- You fly largely alone, in wide open spaces, but occasionally
meeting other gliders on the same cloud street.
- I fly mainly in a busy Alpine setting, constantly close to (and
co-operating with) other gliders on ridges and in thermals. (If I
find myself alone I am reassured that it is not just me who is
finding the conditions difficult to soar in!)
J.


A diametrically opposed false alarm in a thermal suggests wind in the 30 - 60 knot range. I have not seen good thermal development in those conditions, even in extremely strong western desert conditions. I have flown in gaggles of 10 - 15 gliders near the same altitude in the same thermal and have never had such a false alarm.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Actually being helpful! Steve Leonard[_2_] Soaring 3 September 15th 12 02:57 PM
Helpful controller Ridge Piloting 3 July 12th 07 11:57 PM
Ode to the Helpful Homebuilder [email protected] Home Built 13 November 10th 06 08:37 AM
Helpful Aviation DVD's Kobra Piloting 0 October 27th 05 02:10 AM
Which rating would be more helpful? Jeffrey LLoyd Piloting 2 July 17th 03 07:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.