A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

General Zinni on Sixty Minutes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th 04, 11:30 AM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, Art, you shouldn't be ashamed for your service. You are
justifiably proud. But, you should be at least a bit sheepish for
continually repeating an assertion that has no merit.


Bush clearly -did not- complete his service satisfactorily.

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor..._Deserter.html

A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY

Dear Buzz,

Attached is the formal complaint that I made with the Department of
Defense concerning George W. Bush's desertion during the Vietnam war.

Maybe you could post the complaint and encourage others to submit formal
complaints as well. Tell people to call their congresspeople and request as a
constituent service that they write a cover letter and deliver it. It was
amazingly easy for me.

A BuzzFlash Reader

* * *

Desertion

Department of Defense
The Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301-1900


To whom it may concern:

Recently, I was made aware of allegations concerning several violations of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) by George W. Bush during the Vietnam
War. The alleged acts include being Absent Without Leave (UCMJ Article 86) for
a period of more than a year from his National Guard assignments in Texas and
Alabama. According to the UCMJ, a person who is AWOL for more than 30 days with
evidence of no intent to return to duty is guilty of Desertion. (UCMJ Article
85)

To understand the gravity of this offense, one need only read the section 4.9.5
e. of Article 85, which states that the maximum punishment for desertion in a
time of war (3), is, "Death or such other punishment as a court-martial may
direct". As far as I am aware, George W. Bush has never received any punishment
for these alleged crimes, nor has he ever been charged.

When I read about these allegations in national media outlets including, but
not limited to; The Boston Globe(1), The Washington Post(2), The Birmingham
News(3), and The Dallas Morning News(4), I decided to call the Department of
Defense to find out what the Statute of Limitations was for these crimes. I was
informed that because of the nature of the crimes; deserting one's country
during a time of war, that there is NO statute of limitations, and these
crimes, if proven, can still be prosecuted today.

The purpose of this correspondence is to make a formal written complaint with
circumstantial and documentary evidence of George W. Bush's violations of the
UCMJ. Since he is the Commander in Chief of our armed forces, the details of
his past service or lack thereof, are of particular interest to the American
people.

DETAILS:

From May to November 1972, George W. Bush was living in Alabama working on the
US senate campaign of Winton Blount and was required to attend drills with the
Air National Guard unit in Montgomery, Alabama. There is no record that he
attended any drills whatsoever. Additionally, General William Turnipseed (r)
who was commander of the unit at that time has stated in interviews that he
never saw Bush report for duty.

On September 5, 1972, Bush had requested permission to perform duty for
September, October, and November at the 187th Tactical Recon Group in
Montgomery. Permission was granted, and Bush was ordered to report to General
William Turnipseed. In interviews, Turnipseed, and his administrative officer
at the time, Kenneth K. Lott, have stated that they had no memory of Bush ever
reporting.

Seven months later, at Ellington Air Force Base in Texas, Bush's two superior
officers were unable to complete his annual evaluation covering the year from
May 1, 1972 to April 30, 1973 because, "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this
unit during the period of this report." Both superior officers, who are now
dead, and also Ellington's top personnel officer at the time, mistakenly
concluded that Bush served his final year of service in Alabama. Bush returned
to live in Texas after the senatorial election in November, 1972, so this is
obviously not true.

According to the records available from the National Guard, the period between
May 1972 and May 1973 remains unaccounted for. George W. Bush himself has
refused to answer questions about this period in his life, other than to state
that he fulfilled all of his National Guard commitments. If this were true, why
is there no record of him fulfilling these commitments at either of his posts
in Texas or Alabama? Why is there not one commanding officer that can come
forward and state unequivocally that Bush reported for duty?

If the allegations are true that Bush deserted his country during a time of
war, this is one of the gravest offenses one can commit against their country,
short of treason. This is why there is no Statute of Limitations concerning
these crimes. My father served proudly as a field surgeon in Vietnam, and it
distresses me greatly that a person could use his family's influence and power
to not only avoid the draft for service, but then to not fulfill the duties
that he was assigned in substitute for serving in Vietnam.

These crimes are not to be taken lightly, and I believe that all men and women
who serve America proudly would be shocked that a soldier was allowed to abuse
the system in the way that George W. Bush allegedly has. These charges warrant
investigation, and until a satisfactory record of Bush's service is produced, I
can only assume that Bush did indeed desert his country in a time of war.

I implore you to investigate these charges. In this time of war and talk of
preemptive strikes against other countries, it would serve the American people
greatly to know that our Commander in Chief did not run away from duty during
Vietnam. If this man is to send other's husbands, wives, and children to die in
a foreign land, we must make sure that he fulfilled his obligations and
commitments to America before he demands that others do the same.

Sincerely,

A BuzzFlash Reader


  #2  
Old June 5th 04, 08:21 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

Bush clearly -did not- complete his service satisfactorily.


Well, since available documents and at least one witness statement show he
did complete his service, you're clearly a liar or just plain stupid.


  #5  
Old June 4th 04, 09:24 PM
Billy Beck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On 04 Jun 2004 19:07:44 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote:

From: Billy Beck


On 04 Jun 2004 16:48:14 GMT,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

From: Ed Rasimus


What military service?


Art, you of all people should respect someone who earned a commission
in the USAF and completed AF pilot training, then went on to
operationally qualify in a single-seat/single-engine fighter and fly
it for four and a half years.

Did you serve that long?


Yeah you are right. I am ashamed of myself with my measly combat record of
50 missions over Germany being no match for the no-show Bush who hid in
Texas while the Nam war war raged. Mea Culpa. Mea Culpa.


I cannot *wait* until your rotten horse**** no longer appears in
this group, Kramer. Do you understand? I long for the day when
you're gone.

No bull****.


I'm very old. You won't have long to wait. Take joy in that fact.


No, I won't, and certainly not on *your* word. And it doesn't
have to come to that. It would suit my purposes if you only came to
your senses, but I know better than to wait for that. At this point,
I'd be satisfied to know that you'd taken up potting geraniums and
didn't have time for what you do around here.

Let me tell you something: your suvival of your ordeal was once a
big fat credit in my books, but you've long since traded that account
to a flat zero. You did it with your utterly ridiculous
pronouncements, *explicitly trading* on the credit of your experience,
as if that entitled you to strut what you think are you politics here.
The whole while -- and most amply illustrated in the latest round with
Ed -- you've been pleased to deliberately ignore *facts*, and, whether
you know it or not, that is the very essence of depravity.

It's been said that "Man is the only creature that can sink below
its nature."

You're living proof, right here in this newsgroup.

Nothing about it is "joy[ful]" to me, but I hold higher values
than that.


Billy

http://www.two--four.net/weblog.php
  #6  
Old June 5th 04, 01:15 PM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm very old. You won't have long to wait. Take joy in that fact.



Hell, Art.

You're too mean to die. ;-)

Walt
  #7  
Old June 4th 04, 08:17 PM
Robey Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Ed Rasimus
confessed the following:

Art, you of all people should respect someone who earned a commission
in the USAF and completed AF pilot training, then went on to
operationally qualify in a single-seat/single-engine fighter and fly
it for four and a half years.


Minor point of order...gwb graduated from UPT in Nov 1969 (IIRC),
qualified in the 102 in July 1970 and his last flight in a single
engine/single seat fighter was April 1972. He never flew the F-102
again.

My poor math skills indicate that he was operational for less than two
years, of course your math may come up with a different answer.
Perhaps he got bored with it.

Robey
  #10  
Old June 5th 04, 12:22 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Ed Rasimus wrote:

And you don't owe your combat survival to literally hundreds of folks
who weren't in combat but who worked hard to qualify and support your
effort?


You know, like the guys who flew around in less-than-wonderful aircraft
protecting the States while the rest of them were dropping bombs
somewhere.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aviation Marketplace 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 10th 04 11:06 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.