For Keith Willshaw...

In article ,
on 09 Jun 2004 15:49:02 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.

Yet YOU know of this secret meeting ?



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
on 09 Jun 2004 15:49:02 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did
not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting
they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.

Yet YOU know of this secret meeting ?

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even the
members of Congress.

This kind of accusations are usually the last line of defense for those who
want the things that were covered up,remain also covered up.

From: (Denyav)
Date: 6/11/2004 7:50 PM Central

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even the
members of Congress.

More likely they were trying to do a humane service to Kimmel's family.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 00:50:33 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even the
members of Congress.

You give members of congress way too much credit



This kind of accusations are usually the last line of defense for those who
want the things that were covered up,remain also covered up.




--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even
the
members of Congress.

Or the fact that it would have no real world impact and would be seen as
being nice to the next of kin made it seem reasonable.


This kind of accusations are usually the last line of defense for those
who
want the things that were covered up,remain also covered up.

The problem you run into is that I have no stake at all in the Pearl Harbour
issue. I just like poking fun at mad people.

In article ,
on Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:43:43 +1000,
L'acrobat attempted to say .....


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
on 09 Jun 2004 15:49:02 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did
not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting
they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.

Yet YOU know of this secret meeting ?

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.


I forgot that one.
And that lack of evidence is also proof of the conspiracy.

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

From: Tank Fixer
Date: 6/12/2004 12:22 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

In article ,
on Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:43:43 +1000,
L'acrobat attempted to say .....


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
on 09 Jun 2004 15:49:02 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did
not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting
they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.

Yet YOU know of this secret meeting ?

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.


I forgot that one.
And that lack of evidence is also proof of the conspiracy.


Aha, that also explains Hilary's "vast right wing conspiracy."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In article ,
on 08 Jun 2004 21:58:19 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

As a result Kimmel and Short were sent a message that
began "This is to be considered a war warning"

They also added that Pearl Harbor was only possible target.period.

Bullcrap

It did no such thing and to state otherwise is dishonest.

You have proven you havn't read the war warning that was sent on 28 Nov 1941


So which is it ?
Did he try to contact people or do nothing

Do you think that Navy and Army units in Pasific were alerted and waiting for
Japanase to attack?

They had been givin warning on 28 Nov.


Hardly a blueprint of the Pearl Harbor attack plan.

You could only say that if officers of US military intelligence had NOT told to
their superiors cleary "Target is Pearl Harbor" but they did say exactly that
since Nov,28.

When and where did they do so ?

So since Nov,28 they knew the target thanks to work of a few men.
Since their superiors did not respond to their warnings one of
them,Thurman,sidestepped the line of command and personaly went all way up to
White House,with very clear warning of japanase attack with the name of the
target "Pearl Harbor".

Reprinting a lie does not make it so. The 14 part message had no referance
to any target.



For you I'm sure thats true.


Put the blame on Guetenberg and also countless creators of the "
Information Age".

Perhaps you should try reading some and come back ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.