![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To prove this absurd claim the movie Pearl Harbor is cited as
proof, the actions of a fictional character in a work of fiction. Actually the reality is much worse than movie makers could even imagine. Do you know why Kimmels predecessor was relieved of command and replaced by Kimmel? The architect of FDRs Japan &Pearl Harbor game plan was McCollum and McCollum was also,what a surprise !!,head of navy intelligence unit responsible IJN dispatches. Thats the reason why movies mention mostly japanase diplomatic dispatches. You forgot the fact the US did not emerge from the Spanish American war as a major power in military terms, it lacked the navy. It was turning point,with Spanish war USN stopped acting like a littorial navy and started to act like an imperial navy. ope with reality. Go on, fight the everlasting conspiracy, award yourself medals for fighting the terrifying enemy, all in complete safety, since there is nothing to fight, but go on murdering the truth for personal gain. Win the non real event, since no one else is competing. Laws alone cannot deter crooks,if you are not able or willing to catch,prosecute and convict them,no crook will be deterred by the laws written in books. In same token,induviduals who plan vicious acts aganist their own people will not be deterred if the people who planned similar acts in the past could go free or still worse,regarded as Statesmen. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah yes the near total erase and change the subject approach.
Denyav wrote in message ... To prove this absurd claim the movie Pearl Harbor is cited as proof, the actions of a fictional character in a work of fiction. Actually the reality is much worse than movie makers could even imagine. Yes folks, the fictional movie is to be supplemented with more fiction. Do you know why Kimmels predecessor was relieved of command and replaced by Kimmel? Disagreement with the boss. The architect of FDRs Japan &Pearl Harbor game plan was McCollum and McCollum was also,what a surprise !!,head of navy intelligence unit responsible IJN dispatches. Thats the reason why movies mention mostly japanase diplomatic dispatches. I just love these sorts of conspiracy theories, they provide endless hours of laughter. It was to be expected Stinnett would make his appearance, his use of the famed McCollum Memo. By the way if you really want to have us believe Stinnett is the authority check out his page 324 of his hardcover edition where he states "There is no reliable evidence, found by the author, that establishes how much of the 5 - Num [JN25] could be deciphered, translated and read by naval cryptographers in 1941". Now go back and read the book where it assumes, his opinion, his assumption, the USN could read the signals Stinnett wants them to have read, including the ones he tries to pretend were sent by radio instead of hand delivered. Stinnett has no idea what the USN could read, he simply gives his opinion. The conspiracy here is one where people are paid for telling other people what they want to hear. The truth is to be ignored, the money does the talking, be poorer for being lied to and then be unwilling to admit the mistake, and so make yourself even poorer. However the really fun thing is the way the fiction in Stinnett is to be enhanced, by promoting McCollum. No longer is he the Far East expert in the Office of Naval Intelligence, no he is promoted to the command of either ONI (Captain or Admiral rank) or the head of OP-20-GYP, the USN organisation charged with breaking Japanese codes, it was originally called OP-20-GY. Also the famed memo never went further than his boss, nowhere near FDR. By the way if the latest attempt at fiction is to somehow pretend the USN decryption section did not do the work on "purple" it shows an even bigger lack of reality. The "purple" work overloaded the section, slowing down all work. The USN had only one section of cryptographers and security cleared language experts. Finally all the IJN documents and survivors agree the force did not transmit after leaving their usual harbours. See for example the surviving logs, the 1942 IJN after action report and the post war interrogations. The idea Yamamoto would be so stupid as to put his strike force in a harbour that could only be contacted by radio is a joke. The Japanese Navy took control over the cable station at Hitokappu Bay. Also, there was a marine cable between Nemuro, Hokkaido and Shana, Etorofu in 1941 which was then tied to the telegraph office at Hitokappu Bay. Source. Recollection of Mr. Hirokazu Kawguchi of Hachioji City in Tokyo who was born at Shana in 1923 and worked at the Shana cable office. Next, there was a daily air courier service between Ominato and Hitokappu Bay to transfer documents received from Tokyo by air and to send documents to Tokyo by air while the 1st Air Fleet was at Hitokappu Bay. Source. “History on Communications” by Admiral Susumiiro Ishiguru (of Strike Force experience) (Tokyo: Tokyo Reserve Police Association 1953). You forgot the fact the US did not emerge from the Spanish American war as a major power in military terms, it lacked the navy. It was turning point,with Spanish war USN stopped acting like a littorial navy and started to act like an imperial navy. By the way folks, the conspiracy claims are dropped, instead we have something totally different dropped in. Deleted text, "You forgot item 4) the conspiracy theory around the start of the war and the claims the Maine was deliberately sabotaged by the US. The non real event. You see the fact the IJN attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941 is known and understood. The added "facts" of a conspiracy are the contributions of people who cannot cope with reality. " ope with reality. Go on, fight the everlasting conspiracy, award yourself medals for fighting the terrifying enemy, all in complete safety, since there is nothing to fight, but go on murdering the truth for personal gain. Win the non real event, since no one else is competing. Laws alone cannot deter crooks,if you are not able or willing to catch,prosecute and convict them,no crook will be deterred by the laws written in books. In same token,induviduals who plan vicious acts aganist their own people will not be deterred if the people who planned similar acts in the past could go free or still worse,regarded as Statesmen. Translation do not deal with the issues on their merits, invent crimes from years ago and use those as an excuse to do what you want to do, above all do not think. I note the fun things like the URL for the congressional petition transcript makes note of the Japanese consulate's words about a surprise attack being possible, a message not broken out before the attack, to accuse Washington of short changing the field commanders. If the assessment is a surprise attack was possible what does that say of two things, 1) the size of the defences 2) the alertness of the defences. 1) Is largely Washington determined, 2) is locally determined. But do not worry, erase item 2 and carry on with the field commanders did nothing wrong line. The rest is simply text that could not be replied to, Yes folks, understand, look for your facts in Hollywood movies, just add the words you want to historical documents and so on. It is quite simple, since unwelcome reality can be wished away just decide the preferred outcome and adjust the preferred facts accordingly. Denyav is a CIA/FBI/ABC/CBS/DKNY/USN/USAAF, oh what the heck, AAA (many organisations deleted) to ZZZZZ plant. Here to try and improve the reputation of the US by making absolutely absurd claims about it, so no one believes the real claims. By the way note below the talk is all about the missing evidence, but we are told 99.99% is available. Deleted text, on the Congressional moves, " http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/cpqu...el=TOC_545749& Go look up the other items included, the Indianapolis sinking and the waiver on time limits for decorations. " http://www.ukans.edu/carrie/docs/texts/kimmel.htm By the way the claim trying to be defended is the idea Kimmel hurled such accusations at FDR etc. Instead we have the family members putting the best case forward as to why Washington deserves some of the blame. The transcript indicates the accusations were the usual ones, the people in Washington made the errors (not the conspiracy) and the people in Pearl paid the price. Note the transcript is not about prior knowledge of the attack, only the blame game afterwards. However when you want to invent fiction just change this to conspiracy accusations. By the way in the above text Professor Gannon claims 1,000 PBY patrol planes were sent to the British pre Pearl Harbor when he calculates Pearl needed 200 for all round patrols but only had 49. The British (meaning RAF, RCAF. RNZAF and RAAF) received somewhere around 3/4 of this figure for the entire war. The US produced a whole 410 Patrol bombers in 1941, up from 34 in 1940, 22 Martin Mariners (PBM), 6 Consolidated Coranados (PB2Y) and 416 Catalinas (PBY) 1940 to 1941. The PBY had been in production pre war, with around 200 delivered by the end of 1939. Of course you need to remove from the totals the 41 patrol bombers delivered in December 1941 and probably the 54 delivered in October and November 1941 as not being available to sent to Hawaii in time. Also noting the pre war deliveries, starting in 1936, were lower powered versions, 1,800 to 2,000 HP versus 2,400 for the 1940 on versions So we have around 600 patrol bombers with the necessary range built and available to the USN and everyone else, less the attrition of normal flying, 200 of which are needed for Pearl Harbor. Presumably then over 200 are needed for the Philippines, then comes the U-boat threat to the US east coast plus Panama then comes the British requirement. The British are useful, they give feedback on actual combat operations. Do not forget aircraft for training operations as well plus the inevitable losses. Kimmel is allowed "lack of resources" but Washington is not. Nice use of logic. So what's that say 600 aircraft, less around 1/2 for obsolete types, for training and attrition, and we have 300 suitable aircraft. Pearl wants 200, the Philippines wants more, the east coast wants some, the British want some, the training system wants more so it can up the training rate and so on. Pearl Harbor was given 49 aircraft, enough to continuously cover an arc of 90 degrees according to Professor Gannon, or the approaches from the Japanese mandated islands. How many were actually flying such searches on the 5th, 6th and 7th? Gone looking for this evidence? Just jump to conspiracy theory, instead of something like they decided it looked like the Navy was being kind to its own. Deleted text, "Putting words into Kimmel's mouth now I see. Kimmel's defence was that he was deprived of information he needed, mainly messages from the local Japanese consulate and timely warning of the time the last Japanese message was supposed to be presented to the US. There was nothing said about senior leaders wanting the attack to happen." On claims the inquiries were rigged, "I like this, if the one entity argument is followed then the claimed let off for Kimmel is the rigged result, it was an all Navy affair." Ah yes the movie Pearl Harbor is your guide to US intelligence actions in 1941, but wait, there is more, since the movie is a joke on this point the need is to imply the British did it. Just ignore the way the British had more pressing matters on their hands, that the US was leading the way against Japanese diplomatic traffic and the British and US were sharing IJN code recovery work. So what one knew the other did as well. Yes folks, Kimmel was where he should be, no matter where you go, there you are. Note by the way the attempt to paint the inquiry as the absolutely right result, despite claiming not to have seen the evidence presented to it. The USN is the straight organisation, despite the fact it would have been doing the decoding of those wonder messages, it is the one that holds the "truth", everything else is wrong. The conspiracy does not apply to the naval inquiry, it could never have been rigged of course, it has the "right" result, so everything else was rigged. What did the inquiry clear Kimmel of, dereliction of duty, lack of judgement? Standard conspiracy stuff, the right answer is out there, somewhere, pick your preferred outcome. Previously before the next text was another standard claim about conspiracies, as usual the claim has to be deleted and the subject changed. I like this, especially since I posted text showing how the War Warning messages were the same around the Pacific. And MacArthur certainly did not lose more men and equipment that the people in Hawaii in the opening day of the war. What I really like is the duck, unable to answer the text, so change the subject. "By the way the above logic implies the Japanese could have invaded the Philippines, Wake and Guam, killing and capturing Americans and the US would have allowed this. The US did not need Pearl Harbor to enter the Pacific war. The IJN started sinking US merchant ships just before the attack went in." Try and read history, it provides answers like, 1) too far away to know exactly what was going on, 2) MacArthur controlling much of the information flow, 3) The low expectations about holding the Philippines, 4) The reality moving against MacArthur would provoke a reaction in Washington, being seen as an attempt by FDR to rid himself of an unwanted General. Deleted text, It would be nice to know the source of the claimed Kimmel words, it seems his lifetime's output is being searched for any claim he made, no proof offered. Remarkable line being run, the US is the source of all evil but the US is so good, so amazing, it cannot be defeated, only betrayed from within. No one can launch an unexpected attack on the US, it sees and knows all, I must ask the US where my favourite pen has ended up. Geoffrey Sinclair Remove the nb for email. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Geoffrey Sinclair" wrote in message ... By the way the above logic implies the Japanese could have invaded the Philippines, Wake and Guam, killing and capturing Americans and the US would have allowed this. The US did not need Pearl Harbor to enter the Pacific war. The IJN started sinking US merchant ships just before the attack went in. What the conspiroloons can never manage to explain is why the attack was allowed to happen, the USA could have put up a heavy CAP, manned all AA guns and have already flown off a major counterstrike and still would have been at war as the attack came in, the only difference would have been in the phrasing of the announcement and the fact that the US military would have come out of it looking good. A simple, "this morning at aprox 0600hrs the Japanese navy attacked Pearl Harbour without warning, this infamous attack was defeated by the courageous actions of our Army and Navy, the United States is now at war" would have done nicely. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the conspiroloons can never manage to explain is why the attack was
allowed to happen, the USA could have put up a heavy CAP, manned all AA guns and have already flown off a major counterstrike and still would have been at war as the attack came in, the only difference would have been in the phrasing of the announcement and the fact that the US military would have come out of it looking good. Such an activity would deter Japanese from making the attack. The goal of FDR (and Churchill) was not to deter attack but lure Japan to attack US so that the domestic opposition to US participation could be overcome. Thats the reason why Washington gradually reduced the information sent to Honolulu beginning from July 1941. In other words Washington had a political goal and blindfolded Honolulu to achieve this goal. A simple, "this morning at aprox 0600hrs the Japanese navy attacked Pearl Harbour without warning, this infamous attack was defeated by the courageous actions of our Army and Navy, the United States is now at war" would have done nicely. It could easily be done,but it would not help FDR and Churchill as much as shock and awe created by Japanese "surprise" attack. Go to Http://www.ukan.edu/carrie/docs/texts/kimmel.htm and read the testimony of Capt.Beach. In Plain English he says basically: "The goal justifies the methods used to achive the goal" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... What the conspiroloons can never manage to explain is why the attack was allowed to happen, the USA could have put up a heavy CAP, manned all AA guns and have already flown off a major counterstrike and still would have been at war as the attack came in, the only difference would have been in the phrasing of the announcement and the fact that the US military would have come out of it looking good. Such an activity would deter Japanese from making the attack. How? You say the US knew and where when the attack was due, all they needed to do was prep the a/c the night before and launch 30 mins before the attack, plus wake the sailors up early and have them man the AA guns. Reality is not your friend, is it? The goal of FDR (and Churchill) was not to deter attack but lure Japan to attack US so that the domestic opposition to US participation could be overcome. You haven't addressed why they couldn't defeat the attack yet, also you havent explained how getting into a different war with Japan helps the USA get into a war against Germany (or was Hitler in on the big plan too?). Thats the reason why Washington gradually reduced the information sent to Honolulu beginning from July 1941. In other words Washington had a political goal and blindfolded Honolulu to achieve this goal. By sending a war warning? A simple, "this morning at aprox 0600hrs the Japanese navy attacked Pearl Harbour without warning, this infamous attack was defeated by the courageous actions of our Army and Navy, the United States is now at war" would have done nicely. It could easily be done,but it would not help FDR and Churchill as much as shock and awe created by Japanese "surprise" attack. So being IN a war by defeating a surprise attack helps your objective of being IN a war less than being IN a war by not defeating a surprise attack how? Go to Http://www.ukan.edu/carrie/docs/texts/kimmel.htm and read the testimony of Capt.Beach. In Plain English he says basically: "The goal justifies the methods used to achive the goal" Again you feel the need to invent what people are saying. You really should seek medical help. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You say the US knew and where when the attack was due, all they needed to do
was prep the a/c the night before and launch 30 mins before the attack, plus wake the sailors up early and have them man the AA guns. First of all FDR or US did not want to deter japanase or save US ships in Harbor,what FDR wanted was a spectacular event to schock and awe the Nation. The first warning of Pearl Harbor attack did not came before hours,days or weeks before the attack,it came almost one year before attack. 1)On January 27,1941 US Ambassador to Japan ,Joseph Grew sent following message to Washington: "Peruvian minister has informed one my staff that he has heard from many sources,including a Japanase source,that in the event of trouble breaking out between US and Japan,the Japanase intended to make a surprise attack aganist Pearl Harbor with all their strength" Again the date of above message is Jan,27,1941. 2)Later Congressman M.Dies wrote the following: "Early in 1941 the Dies committee came into possesion of a strategic map which gave clear proof of intentions of the japanese to make an assault on Pearl Harbor.The strategic map was prepared by the Japanase Imperial Intelligence dept. As soon as I received rhe document I telephoned Secretary of State Cordell Hull and told him what I had.Secretary Hull directed me not to let anyone know about map and stated that he would call me as soon as he talked to President Roosevelt.In about an hour he telephoned to say that he had talked to Roosevelt and they agreed that it would be very serious if any information concerning this map reached the news services.I told him it was a grave responsibility to withold such vital information from the public.TheSecretary assured me the he and Roosevelt considered essential to national defense" 3)Dusko Popov was a British double agent. In the summer of 1941 Nazis ordered him to Hawai to make a detailed study of PH naval base and its nearby airfields. He deduced that his mission betokened a surprise attack by japanase.In Aug.1941 he reported this to FBI in New York. Later Hoover bitterly recalled that he had provided Popovs warning abour Pearl Harbor to FDR but that Roosevelt told him not to pass the information any further and to just leave in in his ,Presidents,hands" 4)Kilso Haan received definite information from Korean underground that the Japanese were planning to attack Hawai "before Christmas".Haan contacted Iowa Senator Gillette and convinced him that information had merit. Sen.Gillette briefed FDR , but FDR said only"it would be looked into" 5)The Dutch Army in Java on Dec.4 decoded a dispatch from Tokyo to Japan Embassy in Bangkok, forecasting attack on four locations including Hawai.The Dutch passed information to US Brig.Gen Thorpe.Thorpe sent total 4 urgent warning messages to Washington,to last one directly to the desk of Marshalls intel chief.Washington in return ordered Thorpe not send warning messages anymore. Col.Weiijerman,Dutch military attache in Washington,also delivered warning message to Marshalls staff in person. 6)On Nov,29 Cordell Hull met with the journalist J.Leib and handed him some japanese intercepts about Pearl Harbor and told him that Japanase were planning the base and that FDR planned to let it happen. Leib promised to keep Hulls name out of story and contacted UP Washington chief Wilson and told him the details without giving the name of his source. Wilson found story ludicrious and refused to run it but Leib managed to get and urgent version onto UPs foreign service. Reality is not your friend, is it? Is reality your friend? You haven't addressed why they couldn't defeat the attack yet, also you havent explained how getting into a different war with Japan helps the USA get into a war against Germany (or was Hitler in on the big plan too?). Washington was not interested in defeating attack,much less preventing it. By sending a war warning? War warning ?,you make me laugh,unfortunately Kimmel was not under Dutch command. Again you feel the need to invent what people are saying. You really should seek medical help. I think the people who made Maine Incident (unfortunately too late),Pearl Harbor (again unfortunately too late) and 9/11 should seek,no not medical help,but legal help. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoffrey Sinclair" wrote in message ...
After my noting the way my text keeps being deleted it seems a new tactic to obscure has been created, take the time and effort to rearrange the order of the few words of mine left in. Well, I do not remember any of your texts about the utmostly most important detail of whole Pearl Harbor story,namely introduction of JN25B code,being deleted. Because you always avoided this issue and did not write anything about that. Let me repeat again,when Japanese introduced JN25B in Dec.1940,they continued to use old random code books for another two months. This was the one of the biggest ever intel blunders in the history and you have missed it.Strange,to say at least. As I posted before,JN25 was a 19th century system,very identical to the system used by US forces between 1898-1917 and reason why US phased out this system was very simple;it was insecure. So.Japanese military dispatches were,as Churchill pointed out,not secrets for US(also for Brits and Dutch) I guess you could not find time to post anything about that |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As usual most of my words are deleted, new tactic time though, simply
lie about what has been written. Denyav has decided to go back to a message I wrote on June 14, bypassing the JN-25 information I posted more recently. I await with interest his retrieval of information I sent in say 1990 as another desperate tactic to avoid actually answering. denyav wrote in message ... "Geoffrey Sinclair" wrote in message ... After my noting the way my text keeps being deleted it seems a new tactic to obscure has been created, take the time and effort to rearrange the order of the few words of mine left in. Well, I do not remember any of your texts about the utmostly most important detail of whole Pearl Harbor story,namely introduction of JN25B code,being deleted. Yes folks, if Denyav can forget about him deleting the text he can simply pretend it did not happen. He started off passing Pearl Harbor the movie as a source of facts and now finds the real facts are coming out, so rewind to those simpler movie days. Because you always avoided this issue and did not write anything about that. Translation Denyav will make a great effort to delete anything that contradicts his preferred fiction. He will simply ignore what I wrote. Let me repeat again,when Japanese introduced JN25B in Dec.1940,they continued to use old random code books for another two months. This was the one of the biggest ever intel blunders in the history and you have missed it.Strange,to say at least. Translation Denyav has replied to the message where I pointed out what this meant and has now decided to lie about it rather than cope with replying. I expect him to heroically delete my reply and the heroically repeat he is repeating his same junk. Two heroic acts means another self awarded medal. As I posted before,JN25 was a 19th century system,very identical to the system used by US forces between 1898-1917 and reason why US phased out this system was very simple;it was insecure. Translation no proof brought forward, just a wishful thinking. So.Japanese military dispatches were,as Churchill pointed out,not secrets for US(also for Brits and Dutch) Churchill pointed out all the messages they intercepted and decoded were made public just after the war. I guess you could not find time to post anything about that Translation Denyav deletes things he does not like. The fun thing is anyone can go and check on my posts, that is why I leave the text in. It helps show up the lies. The rest is cut and paste from my last post, on June 22, The story so far, 1) the claims about the war warning message text, dropped after the war warning text was actually posted. (the warnings are supposed to make Pearl Harbor the only target) 2) the use of the character in the Pearl Harbor movie played by Dan Aykroyd as a source of facts, dropped when it was revealed where the name came from. 3) claims about the various investigations into the Pearl Harbor attack, dropped when a list of such investigations was posted 4) attempts to promote the relatively recent congressional request to promote General Short and Admiral Kimmel as proof of a conspiracy are dropped, after the text of the resolution is posted. 5) claims about what Admiral Kimmel said are backed up by the URL of the transcript of the congressional request meeting, Kimmel had been dead for around 30 years before the meeting. The URL text does not support pre knowledge of the attack and includes over statements on Kimmels behalf (inventing 800 to 1,000 extra patrol bombers available) 6) the claim the only investigation to clear Kimmel is the reliable one despite the claim the findings and evidence have never been released. Claim dropped again. 7) The claims the investigations were all rigged because it was one entity investigating itself. Dropped since the claimed only investigation to clear Kimmel was USN, the USN investigating the USN. 8) Hollywood is a US "premier quasi-governmental PSYOP organization." Claim dropped. 9) The claim the US needed Pearl to be attacked, apparently the assaults on Wake, Guam, Midway, the Philippines and US shipping were not enough. Claim dropped. 10) The claim MacArthur received warnings Hawaii did not, claim dropped. The same war warnings were sent to all commands in the Pacific. 11) the claim the "McCollum Memo" was a blueprint for US government actions, dropped after the memo summary was posted, pointing out what the memo actually said. 12) the claim McCollum was in charge of codebreaking dropped, his memo header makes it clear he was in a different area. 13) If you write a book that says no conspiracy you are automatically said to be pushing the official version, and such versions are claimed to be wrong. No proof mind you. Claim dropped. 14) The conspiracy pushers cannot lie unless they receive official permission. That was a good one. 15) There are still some USN intercept files still hidden, claim dropped. 16) The attempt to use Stinnett as a source appears to be dropped, since the claims are so easy to prove wrong it seems. If you question Stinnett directly he complains about spelling errors rather than reply. 17) The Lietwiler letter, claims dropped after the key text was posted. 18) Only in Washington are investigations rigged with hand picked documents. Claim dropped. Simple really, just keep dropping all the claimed evidence, but keep the conclusion. Most of my stuff is cut and paste, you become interested in WWII and you find the same conspiracy claims surfacing over and over. The fact the posts have to be deleted is the best proof they are accurate. Also the fleeing forward to new claims, not defending the old junk. It seems we are going to be treated to the tour of the various conspiracy claims, which goes to prove what Denyav is when he can quote a character in the Paral Harbor movie as a source but also supply all the other conspiracy claims. Since there are no sources for the following information can we assume the nurse character in Pearl Harbor the movie is the source? Presumably the British reporting the codes were hard to break is also irrelevant? 1)They are not hard to break,they are actually 19th Century type codes that somehow apperared in 20th century. Note by the way there is no source for this claim, note the fact the 1930's are not that far into the 20th century. Radio and telegraph communications forced the development of coding systems. The code groups were disguised with random numbers, it forced the US into using machines to break the code, to try and discover the random numbers by comparing hundreds of messages. The code breakers indicated this was a hard thing to do. 2)A very identical coding system was introduced in US in 1898 for Navy and Army and and abondoned in 1917 because it was insecure. So why didn't the US simply drag out the US code books and use them? Perhaps because the systems were different? Please describe the US systems, how they worked. 3)It has dictionary of 33,333 words and phrases each given as a five figure number and these were added to random numbers contained in a 2nd code book Not quite, there were 33,333 valid code groups, in both the A and B versions some were left blank for future expansion. In the B version around 2/3 of the groups had a second meaning, giving around 55,000 valid meanings. Random numbers were added to the code groups before transmission. 4)The dictionary was changed only once before Pearl Harbor on Dec 1,1940. But random book was changed in every 3 to 6 months. You forgot to mention the B version contained additional tables for locations, date/time and positions, a super encypherment. These tables were not broken out until mid 1942. 5)The Japanase blundered away the Code when they introduced JN25B by continuing to use the random table books that have been solved by the allies,for two more months.That was the equivalent of reconstructing the exposed dictionary.US recovered the whole thing immediately. So now the lies begin. Firstly the failure to update the random number book enabled the allies to confirm the basic system was still in place. The valid code groups were 5 digit numbers divisible by 3. Secondly the allies did not have all the valid random numbers, additives, used to disguise the valid code groups, thirdly the Japanese did not put out messages containing all 55,000 valid code group meanings in the two months, December 1940 and January 1941. As of Autumn 1940 the US had around 1,000 JN-25A code groups it thought it knew the meanings for, work continued on the A version until around March 1941, on 1 April 1941 there were 1,800 A version groups "recovered", versus 300 B version groups. It should be noted recoveries were not a linear process, new discoveries could and did prove previously assigned meanings were wrong. So if you know JB25B inroduction date,you also know when allies cracked the code basically. My cat has 4 legs and a tail my dog has 4 legs and a tail therefore my dog is a cat. Simple sort of logic. Put it to you thins way, you are given 30,000 5 digit random numbers, which have 55,000 meanings. Solve instantly. Now solve when you have less than 1/2 of the random numbers used to disguise the code group values. Now go work on this, if you know 10% of the random numbers and 10% of the code groups then, assuming randomness, around 1% of the messages will contain code groups you know hidden by random numbers you know. To crack the code you needed to know the random numbers and the code group values. Just for the record,in 1994 NSA published that JN25B code was completely cracked in December 1940. They knew that many knew that and they finally admitted. Yes folks this is the fun part of the lies. “Early (Northern) Fall” 1940 the US code breakers realised the system for numbers in JN-25A was the same as an old code the US has the code book for, the code group was the number itself multiplied by a constant. In a single day of checking the high frequency code groups the code groups for the numbers 0 to 999 fell out, 1/30 of the total code. Since all code these group values were divisible by three it confirmed the tentative code group values previously assigned were correct and told the code breakers valid code group values were divisible by three. After this discovery the task of further recoveries and exploiting traffic was largely shifted to Corregidor, which for a time in 1940/41 was the largest USN code breaking unit, having completely absorbed the Shanghai unit in December 1940. (SRH-179 notes that the personnel from Shanghai were transferred to Corregidor in phases from August 1940 to December 1940. The last group of ten men from Shanghai reported to Corregidor on 16 December 1940. Just before that time the intercept and decryption efforts at Shanghai were shut down.) In effect Washington declared JN-25A “completely solved” and “completely broken”, that is the system was understood and the remaining work was in recovering and assigning meanings to code groups, then exploiting the results. The result was most work was directed at the earlier, now superseded versions, to try and recover the underlying code groups, since there were many more messages in those versions, the keys of the latest text additive book were also targeted as intercepts built up. No attempt was made to read current traffic. See the different definitions being used? The USN used the definition that it understood how the code system worked, it had cracked the logic but it only had 1/30 of the code groups. The usual conspiracy situation is to try and convince people what is being meant is 100% recovery of code groups and random numbers. 6)In January 1941,US gave Britain two JN25B note books with keys Ah yes, the US and UK combining recoveries is simply turned into they had the entire code and additive books. So here we go with another basic lie. One of the problems to sort out in early 1941 was when the US and UK had different values for valid random numbers and meanings for valid code groups. 7)Whole Pearl Harbor schema was based on this code. You mean Yamamoto's letters to his staff were sent in JN-25B? The couriered messages were in JN-25B? This is really funny. 8)Between Sep1 and Pearl Harbor attack US intercepted total 26581 (acc.to NSA) JN25N coded messages. Yes folks, apparently these messages were all about Pearl Harbor. Deleted text, "None of the messages found in the "Pre-Pearl Harbor Japanese Naval Dispatches" file mention Pearl Harbor by name. (This file is found in National Archives at College Park, RG 38, Crane Files, CNSG 5830/115; most of the messages have also have been reprinted in "Pearl Harbor Revisited: United States Navy Communications Intelligence, 1924-1941," an unclassified monograph published by the National Security Agency in 1994.)" The USN went back in 1945/46 and broke out as many of the pre war messages as it could to see what they could have told. One of the favourite tricks is to claim the 1946 dates are faked. 9)Churchill wrote "from the end of 1940 Americans had pierced vital Japanase ciphers and were decoding large numbers of Japanase MILITARY and diplomatic messages" GRAND ALLIANCE page 598 A more full version of the quote is, "From the end of 1940 the Americans had pierced the vital Japanese ciphers, and were decoding large numbers of their military and diplomatic telegrams. In the secret American circles these were referred to as 'Magics'. The 'Magics' were repeated to us, but there was an inevitable delay - sometimes of two or three days - before we got them. We did not know therefore at any given moment all that the President or Mr. Hull knew. I make no complaint of this." This is a favourite quote of the conspiracy crowd, it is supposed to be Churchill confessing the code breakings they want. Apparently putting the boot into the recently deceased FDR and also himself. The quote is above is on page 532 of the edition I have access to, on page 535 comes the quote, "A prodigious Congressional Inquiry published its findings in 1946 in which every detail was exposed of the events leading up to the war between the United States and Japan and of the failure to send positive "alert" orders through the military departments to their fleets and garrisons in exposed situations. Every detail, including the decoding of secret Japanese telegrams and their actual texts, has been displayed to the world in forty volumes. The strength of the United States was sufficient to enable them to sustain this hard ordeal required by the spirit of the American Constitution." Simple really, fail to mention Churchill noted what the allies had read they put into the public arena in 1946. Otherwise the conspiracy requires Churchill to be alternatively the truth bringer and telling lies. And remember the IJN had more than 1 code in service, as did the IJA, but just pretend Churchill's first quote has an extra line with JN-25B in it. Hard to break JN25B code is an urban legend created in Washington D.C.to cover treason. Translation telling lies about JN-25 is an attempt to cover someone's inability to cope with reality. Geoffrey Sinclair Remove the nb for email. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
apanese introduced JN25B in Dec.1940,they
continued to use old random code books for another two months. This was the one of the biggest ever intel blunders in the history and you have missed it.Strange,to say at least. Translation Denyav has replied to the message where I pointed out what this meant and has now decided to lie about it rather than cope with replying. Again you are dodging questions about the most important blunder of Japanese in WWII,by filling your posts with senseless crap. Did Japanase continue to use old random JN25 code books for another two months after introduction of "improved" JN25B version ? As I posted before,JN25 was a 19th century system,very identical to the system used by US forces between 1898-1917 and reason why US phased out this system was very simple;it was insecure. Translation no proof brought forward, just a wishful thinking. Strange,You seem to know eveything about US ,but seemingly nothing about a system which is used by US for twenty years. BTW methods for cracking JN-25 or its father US system were published in various journals world wide in 1931. Churchill pointed out all the messages they intercepted and decoded were made public just after the wa If you cannot dodge a question unfortunately you resort to lies. Check out Grand Alliance,page 598. "From the end of 1940,the Americans pierced the vital Japanase ciphers,and were decoding large numbers of their MILITARY and diplomatic messages" W.Churchill A hint for you:When Japanase introduced JN25B ? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
deleted text,
"As usual most of my words are deleted, new tactic time though, simply lie about what has been written. Denyav has decided to go back to a message I wrote on June 14, bypassing the JN-25 information I posted more recently. I await with interest his retrieval of information I sent in say 1990 as another desperate tactic to avoid actually answering. Yes folks, if Denyav can forget about him deleting the text he can simply pretend it did not happen. He started off passing Pearl Harbor the movie as a source of facts and now finds the real facts are coming out, so rewind to those simpler movie days." Denyav wrote in message ... apanese introduced JN25B in Dec.1940,they continued to use old random code books for another two months. This was the one of the biggest ever intel blunders in the history and you have missed it.Strange,to say at least. Translation Denyav has replied to the message where I pointed out what this meant and has now decided to lie about it rather than cope with replying. deleted text, "I expect him to heroically delete my reply and the heroically repeat he is repeating his same junk. Two heroic acts means another self awarded medal." Again you are dodging questions about the most important blunder of Japanese in WWII,by filling your posts with senseless crap. Lets see now, I have mentioned for quite some time the failure to change additive books in December 1941. Did Japanase continue to use old random JN25 code books for another two months after introduction of "improved" JN25B version ? Sigh, I keep telling you the additive book was not changed for the first two months as for why you would have to ask the IJN, presumably an administrative foul up. Now tell us all how this meant the allies gained the complete code book in 2 months. Not just a list of valid code groups. As I posted before,JN25 was a 19th century system,very identical to the system used by US forces between 1898-1917 and reason why US phased out this system was very simple;it was insecure. Translation no proof brought forward, just a wishful thinking. Strange,You seem to know eveything about US ,but seemingly nothing about a system which is used by US for twenty years. BTW methods for cracking JN-25 or its father US system were published in various journals world wide in 1931. Translation no proof brought forward, just a wishful thinking. Oh yes, the fact there is said to be a theoretical way to crack a system is supposed to equal the system was cracked, silly isn't it? The idea the Japanese might improve the system is dismissed. Churchill pointed out all the messages they intercepted and decoded were made public just after the wa If you cannot dodge a question unfortunately you resort to lies. This is good, see the Churchill quote below. Check out Grand Alliance,page 598. "From the end of 1940, the Americans pierced the vital Japanase ciphers, and were decoding large numbers of their MILITARY and diplomatic messages" W.Churchill The quote is above is on page 532 of the edition I have access to, on page 535 comes the quote, "A prodigious Congressional Inquiry published its findings in 1946 in which every detail was exposed of the events leading up to the war between the United States and Japan and of the failure to send positive "alert" orders through the military departments to their fleets and garrisons in exposed situations. Every detail, including the decoding of secret Japanese telegrams and their actual texts, has been displayed to the world in forty volumes. The strength of the United States was sufficient to enable them to sustain this hard ordeal required by the spirit of the American Constitution." Simple really, fail to mention Churchill noted what the allies had read they put into the public arena in 1946. Otherwise the conspiracy requires Churchill to be alternatively the truth bringer and telling lies. And remember the IJN had more than 1 code in service, as did the IJA, but just pretend Churchill's first quote has an extra line with JN-25B in it. A hint for you:When Japanase introduced JN25B ? A hint for you, when did the USN report it had cracked JN-25A? How about the "dockyard" code? The weather code? Some of the IJNAF codes? When exactly did the IJN move exclusively to using JN-25B for everything? The rest is deleted text. Most of my stuff is cut and paste, you become interested in WWII and you find the same conspiracy claims surfacing over and over. The fact the posts have to be deleted is the best proof they are accurate. Also the fleeing forward to new claims, not defending the old junk. It seems we are going to be treated to the tour of the various conspiracy claims, which goes to prove what Denyav is when he can quote a character in the Pearl Harbor movie as a source but also supply all the other conspiracy claims. Since there are no sources for the following information can we assume the nurse character in Pearl Harbor the movie is the source? Presumably the British reporting the codes were hard to break is also irrelevant? 1)They are not hard to break,they are actually 19th Century type codes that somehow apperared in 20th century. Note by the way there is no source for this claim, note the fact the 1930's are not that far into the 20th century. Radio and telegraph communications forced the development of coding systems. The code groups were disguised with random numbers, it forced the US into using machines to break the code, to try and discover the random numbers by comparing hundreds of messages. The code breakers indicated this was a hard thing to do. 2)A very identical coding system was introduced in US in 1898 for Navy and Army and and abondoned in 1917 because it was insecure. So why didn't the US simply drag out the US code books and use them? Perhaps because the systems were different? Please describe the US systems, how they worked. 3)It has dictionary of 33,333 words and phrases each given as a five figure number and these were added to random numbers contained in a 2nd code book Not quite, there were 33,333 valid code groups, in both the A and B versions some were left blank for future expansion. In the B version around 2/3 of the groups had a second meaning, giving around 55,000 valid meanings. Random numbers were added to the code groups before transmission. 4)The dictionary was changed only once before Pearl Harbor on Dec 1,1940. But random book was changed in every 3 to 6 months. You forgot to mention the B version contained additional tables for locations, date/time and positions, a super encypherment. These tables were not broken out until mid 1942. 5)The Japanase blundered away the Code when they introduced JN25B by continuing to use the random table books that have been solved by the allies,for two more months.That was the equivalent of reconstructing the exposed dictionary.US recovered the whole thing immediately. So now the lies begin. Firstly the failure to update the random number book enabled the allies to confirm the basic system was still in place. The valid code groups were 5 digit numbers divisible by 3. Secondly the allies did not have all the valid random numbers, additives, used to disguise the valid code groups, thirdly the Japanese did not put out messages containing all 55,000 valid code group meanings in the two months, December 1940 and January 1941. As of Autumn 1940 the US had around 1,000 JN-25A code groups it thought it knew the meanings for, work continued on the A version until around March 1941, on 1 April 1941 there were 1,800 A version groups "recovered", versus 300 B version groups. It should be noted recoveries were not a linear process, new discoveries could and did prove previously assigned meanings were wrong. So if you know JB25B inroduction date,you also know when allies cracked the code basically. My cat has 4 legs and a tail my dog has 4 legs and a tail therefore my dog is a cat. Simple sort of logic. Put it to you thins way, you are given 30,000 5 digit random numbers, which have 55,000 meanings. Solve instantly. Now solve when you have less than 1/2 of the random numbers used to disguise the code group values. Now go work on this, if you know 10% of the random numbers and 10% of the code groups then, assuming randomness, around 1% of the messages will contain code groups you know hidden by random numbers you know. To crack the code you needed to know the random numbers and the code group values. Just for the record,in 1994 NSA published that JN25B code was completely cracked in December 1940. They knew that many knew that and they finally admitted. Yes folks this is the fun part of the lies. “Early (Northern) Fall” 1940 the US code breakers realised the system for numbers in JN-25A was the same as an old code the US has the code book for, the code group was the number itself multiplied by a constant. In a single day of checking the high frequency code groups the code groups for the numbers 0 to 999 fell out, 1/30 of the total code. Since all code these group values were divisible by three it confirmed the tentative code group values previously assigned were correct and told the code breakers valid code group values were divisible by three. After this discovery the task of further recoveries and exploiting traffic was largely shifted to Corregidor, which for a time in 1940/41 was the largest USN code breaking unit, having completely absorbed the Shanghai unit in December 1940. (SRH-179 notes that the personnel from Shanghai were transferred to Corregidor in phases from August 1940 to December 1940. The last group of ten men from Shanghai reported to Corregidor on 16 December 1940. Just before that time the intercept and decryption efforts at Shanghai were shut down.) In effect Washington declared JN-25A “completely solved” and “completely broken”, that is the system was understood and the remaining work was in recovering and assigning meanings to code groups, then exploiting the results. The result was most work was directed at the earlier, now superseded versions, to try and recover the underlying code groups, since there were many more messages in those versions, the keys of the latest text additive book were also targeted as intercepts built up. No attempt was made to read current traffic. See the different definitions being used? The USN used the definition that it understood how the code system worked, it had cracked the logic but it only had 1/30 of the code groups. The usual conspiracy situation is to try and convince people what is being meant is 100% recovery of code groups and random numbers. 6)In January 1941,US gave Britain two JN25B note books with keys Ah yes, the US and UK combining recoveries is simply turned into they had the entire code and additive books. So here we go with another basic lie. One of the problems to sort out in early 1941 was when the US and UK had different values for valid random numbers and meanings for valid code groups. 7)Whole Pearl Harbor schema was based on this code. You mean Yamamoto's letters to his staff were sent in JN-25B? The couriered messages were in JN-25B? This is really funny. 8)Between Sep1 and Pearl Harbor attack US intercepted total 26581 (acc.to NSA) JN25N coded messages. Yes folks, apparently these messages were all about Pearl Harbor. Deleted text, "None of the messages found in the "Pre-Pearl Harbor Japanese Naval Dispatches" file mention Pearl Harbor by name. (This file is found in National Archives at College Park, RG 38, Crane Files, CNSG 5830/115; most of the messages have also have been reprinted in "Pearl Harbor Revisited: United States Navy Communications Intelligence, 1924-1941," an unclassified monograph published by the National Security Agency in 1994.)" The USN went back in 1945/46 and broke out as many of the pre war messages as it could to see what they could have told. One of the favourite tricks is to claim the 1946 dates are faked. 9)Churchill wrote "from the end of 1940 Americans had pierced vital Japanase ciphers and were decoding large numbers of Japanase MILITARY and diplomatic messages" GRAND ALLIANCE page 598 A more full version of the quote is, "From the end of 1940 the Americans had pierced the vital Japanese ciphers, and were decoding large numbers of their military and diplomatic telegrams. In the secret American circles these were referred to as 'Magics'. The 'Magics' were repeated to us, but there was an inevitable delay - sometimes of two or three days - before we got them. We did not know therefore at any given moment all that the President or Mr. Hull knew. I make no complaint of this." This is a favourite quote of the conspiracy crowd, it is supposed to be Churchill confessing the code breakings they want. Apparently putting the boot into the recently deceased FDR and also himself. The quote is above is on page 532 of the edition I have access to, on page 535 comes the quote, "A prodigious Congressional Inquiry published its findings in 1946 in which every detail was exposed of the events leading up to the war between the United States and Japan and of the failure to send positive "alert" orders through the military departments to their fleets and garrisons in exposed situations. Every detail, including the decoding of secret Japanese telegrams and their actual texts, has been displayed to the world in forty volumes. The strength of the United States was sufficient to enable them to sustain this hard ordeal required by the spirit of the American Constitution." Simple really, fail to mention Churchill noted what the allies had read they put into the public arena in 1946. Otherwise the conspiracy requires Churchill to be alternatively the truth bringer and telling lies. And remember the IJN had more than 1 code in service, as did the IJA, but just pretend Churchill's first quote has an extra line with JN-25B in it. Hard to break JN25B code is an urban legend created in Washington D.C.to cover treason. Translation telling lies about JN-25 is an attempt to cover someone's inability to cope with reality. Geoffrey Sinclair Remove the nb for email. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 20 | January 10th 04 05:19 PM |