![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regnirps wrote:
(Fred the Red Shirt) wrote: Do you seriously expect us to beleive that people are emailing YOU to tell you what they think of Walt? Uhm, this is a mail list. Are you reading it off the web page? Are you saying that some cretin is republishing these rec.aviation.military usenet articles in an email list? He can be sued for that, in some places. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Regnirps) wrote in message ...
Dweezil Dwarftosser wrote: Regnirps wrote: (Fred the Red Shirt) wrote: Do you seriously expect us to beleive that people are emailing YOU to tell you what they think of Walt? Uhm, this is a mail list. Are you reading it off the web page? Are you saying that some cretin is republishing these rec.aviation.military usenet articles in an email list? Not necessarily a cretin. Oops. I tend to read my mail lists and newsgroups at the same time. The way they read and the way I respond works the same. No worries. There have been NNTP to SMTP interfaces that did pass UseNet newsgroup articles to email lists and vice-versa. I dunno if any are currently in use. Probably they have been obsoleted by HTTP (www) interfaces. -- FF |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Regnirps) wrote in message ...
(Fred the Red Shirt) wrote: Do you seriously expect us to believe that people are emailing YOU to tell you what they think of Walt? Uhm, this is a mail list. Are you reading it off the web page? This is a UseNet newsgroup, rec.aviation.military. Are you reading this off a mailing list? -- FF |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HOWEVER, another case heard by the court did address the exact same
substantive issue raised in Padilla and that ruling upheld habeas, thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla. So, your characterisation was, to say the least, inaccurate. The USSC handed America a great victory that day. -- Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process. Padilla is the benchmark case because he is an American citizen arrested in America at a time when the courts could operate freely. Hamdi (the other case) was arrested in Afghanistan. This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew. Walt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Bill of Rights in the Toilet: was Bush in the Air Guard
From: (Fred the Red Shirt) Date: 7/18/2004 2:54 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: (WalterM140) wrote in message ... HOWEVER, another case heard by the court did address the exact same substantive issue raised in Padilla and that ruling upheld habeas, thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla. So, your characterisation was, to say the least, inaccurate. The USSC handed America a great victory that day. -- Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process. You leave it indeterminate as to which of my sentences your 'Not' refers. No matter though, you are wrong regardless. Padilla is the benchmark case because he is an American citizen arrested in America at a time when the courts could operate freely. And he lost only on the procedural/jurisdictional issue. The USSC did not rule (and therfor as you seem to keep missing did NOT RULE AGAINST) his habeas petition. Hamdi (the other case) was arrested in Afghanistan. And the ruling upholding habeas for Hamidi as well as his right to access to the Federal Courts applies as well to Padilla, thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla. Bynot ruling on the habeas issue per se in Padilla the USSC simply avoided repeating itself. So you are dead wrong. The USSC handed America a great victory that day. This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew. See Milligan VS U.S. SCOTUS 1865 Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |