A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More on Bush in the Air Guard



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old July 16th 04, 11:17 AM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HOWEVER, another case heard by the court did address the exact same
substantive issue raised in Padilla and that ruling upheld habeas,
thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla.

So, your characterisation was, to say the least, inaccurate.

The USSC handed America a great victory that day.

--


Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.

Padilla is the benchmark case because he is an American citizen arrested in
America at a time when the courts could operate freely.

Hamdi (the other case) was arrested in Afghanistan.

This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew.


Walt
  #9  
Old July 18th 04, 10:54 PM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(WalterM140) wrote in message ...
HOWEVER, another case heard by the court did address the exact same
substantive issue raised in Padilla and that ruling upheld habeas,
thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla.

So, your characterisation was, to say the least, inaccurate.

The USSC handed America a great victory that day.

--


Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.


You leave it indeterminate as to which of my sentences your 'Not'
refers.

No matter though, you are wrong regardless.


Padilla is the benchmark case because he is an American citizen arrested in
America at a time when the courts could operate freely.


And he lost only on the procedural/jurisdictional issue. The USSC
did not rule (and therfor as you seem to keep missing did NOT RULE
AGAINST) his habeas petition.



Hamdi (the other case) was arrested in Afghanistan.


And the ruling upholding habeas for Hamidi as well as his right
to access to the Federal Courts applies as well to Padilla, thus
mooting the substantive issue in Padilla. Bynot ruling on the
habeas issue per se in Padilla the USSC simply avoided repeating
itself.

So you are dead wrong.

The USSC handed America a great victory that day.


This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew.


The arguement on the part of the Bush administration all along has
essentially been that they are above the law. To say that their
case lacked merit would be an understatement.

--

FF
  #10  
Old July 18th 04, 11:04 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Bill of Rights in the Toilet: was Bush in the Air Guard
From: (Fred the Red Shirt)
Date: 7/18/2004 2:54 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

(WalterM140) wrote in message
...
HOWEVER, another case heard by the court did address the exact same
substantive issue raised in Padilla and that ruling upheld habeas,
thus mooting the substantive issue in Padilla.

So, your characterisation was, to say the least, inaccurate.

The USSC handed America a great victory that day.

--


Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.


You leave it indeterminate as to which of my sentences your 'Not'
refers.

No matter though, you are wrong regardless.


Padilla is the benchmark case because he is an American citizen arrested in
America at a time when the courts could operate freely.


And he lost only on the procedural/jurisdictional issue. The USSC
did not rule (and therfor as you seem to keep missing did NOT RULE
AGAINST) his habeas petition.



Hamdi (the other case) was arrested in Afghanistan.


And the ruling upholding habeas for Hamidi as well as his right
to access to the Federal Courts applies as well to Padilla, thus
mooting the substantive issue in Padilla. Bynot ruling on the
habeas issue per se in Padilla the USSC simply avoided repeating
itself.

So you are dead wrong.

The USSC handed America a great victory that day.


This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew.



See Milligan VS U.S. SCOTUS 1865

Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve WalterM140 Military Aviation 196 June 14th 04 11:33 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.