More on Bush in the Air Guard

"ArtKramr" wrote

See Milligan VS U.S. SCOTUS 1865

Sure thing Professor...

Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.

Due process in war, is a blade in the gut, and a slicing movement
to cut the artery. **** him.


Kill them all, let God sort them out. Nobody lives forever.

"Billy Preston" wrote in message news:SxDKc.6363$Zr.654@okepread01...
Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.

Due process in war, is a blade in the gut, and a slicing movement
to cut the artery. **** him.


Kill them all, let God sort them out. Nobody lives forever.

Montforte.

--

FF

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:09:17 -0700, Fred the Red Shirt wrote:

"Billy Preston" wrote in message news:SxDKc.6363$Zr.654@okepread01...
Not when a citizen --any citizen-- is denied due process.

Due process in war, is a blade in the gut, and a slicing movement
to cut the artery. **** him.


Kill them all, let God sort them out. Nobody lives forever.

Montforte.

I thought it was some papal representative at Carcassonne
and the quote was:

"Kill them all, God will know his own"

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

And the ruling upholding habeas for Hamidi as well as his right
to access to the Federal Courts applies as well to Padilla, thus
mooting the substantive issue in Padilla.

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.

Bynot ruling on the
habeas issue per se in Padilla the USSC simply avoided repeating
itself.

So you are dead wrong.

But Padilla is still incarcerated.



The USSC handed America a great victory that day.


This issue alone is enough to toss Bush and his sorry crew.


The arguement on the part of the Bush administration all along has
essentially been that they are above the law. To say that their
case lacked merit would be an understatement.


So I think we are basically in agreement.

Thanks for your input.

Walt

"WalterM140" wrote

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.

Should have hung him by now.

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:10:34 -0500, Billy Preston wrote:

"WalterM140" wrote

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.

Should have hung him by now.

No that would be cruel and un-Islamic.
Behead him.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

"WalterM140" wrote

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.

Should have hung him by now.

If he were guilty, that wouldn't bother me a bit. He may be guilty, probably is
guilty of something.

Why not charge him with a crime and give him a trial?

Holding him indefinitely is a violation of any reasonable interpretaion of law
and precedent.


Walt

"WalterM140" wrote:
And the ruling upholding habeas for Hamidi as well as his right
to access to the Federal Courts applies as well to Padilla, thus
mooting the substantive issue in Padilla.

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.

And based on Justice Conner's comments in the opinions that were delivered
recently, the State will still be holding Padilla after a habeas hearing.

(WalterM140) wrote in message ...

Except that Padilla is still incarcerated.


But he is not incarcerated without access to due process.

That was what the cases befor the USSC were all about, not
whether or not the defendants should be held or not, just
whether or not the courts have a say in the matter. The
USSC ruled that they do.



But Padilla is still incarcerated.

What I wrote above is still true.

--

FF