![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You mean using the engine or motor is /_not_/ scored as a land out?Â*
Seems pretty obvious to me.Â* Give the poor bloke a participation trophy for the day and move on.Â* Oh, and fix such a dumb over sight. On 12/23/2017 10:58 PM, Jeff Morgan wrote: On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 4:50:23 PM UTC-7, Andy Blackburn wrote: Imagine a scoring system where you get 5 minutes added to your time on course for every minute you run your MOP. If you did a 4 knot climb under power for 15 minutes to get home it would cost you about an incremental hour, so you'd only be inclined to use it when the alternative is landing out. Easy fix. Since the motor is to prevent the land-out score it this way: Starting Motor = Land Out. The benefit is avoiding the inconvenience of the land out. Back to the airport in time for BBQ and beer, hope for better the next day. -- Dan, 5J --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Morgan wrote on 12/23/2017 9:58 PM:
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 4:50:23 PM UTC-7, Andy Blackburn wrote: Imagine a scoring system where you get 5 minutes added to your time on course for every minute you run your MOP. If you did a 4 knot climb under power for 15 minutes to get home it would cost you about an incremental hour, so you'd only be inclined to use it when the alternative is landing out. Easy fix. Since the motor is to prevent the land-out score it this way: Starting Motor = Land Out. The benefit is avoiding the inconvenience of the land out. Back to the airport in time for BBQ and beer, hope for better the next day. But you still have the situation where the motor changes the game in various ways. One is the glider with a motor will do more poorly in weak weather with it's higher wing loading; another is the pilot can push on during a poor day, knowing he will achieve the best score he can, and still be able to return home easily - no lengthy midnight retrieve to leave him too tired to fly the next day. Longing for "Purity" in the sport is normal, but we don't share a common definition of "pure": a dedicated 1-26 pilot might think it's a distinction without a difference when you talk about an 18 meter glider with or without a motor. For me, a long-time self-launcher owner, a class that uses hybrid scoring sounds interesting, and I look forward to the experiment. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Dec 2014a" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://soaringsafety.org/prevention/...anes-2014A.pdf |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team Selection Policy Changes | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 84 | September 27th 10 08:03 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team SelectionPolicy Changes | JS | Soaring | 4 | September 22nd 10 04:55 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team SelectionPolicy Changes | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 0 | September 19th 10 10:33 PM |
US Standard Class and World Class Nationals at Hobbs | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 7 | July 16th 04 04:03 AM |
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 03 10:07 PM |