GWB has been a good Commander-in-Chief

wrote:
In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

Did you have some point to make?

For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah. bush
didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You every fly an F-102? Hell, you ever fly at all?

"sanjian" wrote in message
news:amcVc.7980$ni.5686@okepread01...
: wrote:
: In , on 08/19/2004
: at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:
:
: Did you have some point to make?
:
: For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah. bush
: didn't do something dangerous and daring.
:
: You every fly an F-102? Hell, you ever fly at all?

Le'Turd is always "flying" on something over in a.m.r. He's one of our few
resident Bush-haters over there. I'd bet even money that Le'Turd's mouth
and an organ of Kerry's are a perfect match.

:
:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 08:26 PM, "Bigredwingsfan" said:


"sanjian" wrote in message
news:amcVc.7980$ni.5686@okepread01...
: wrote:
: In , on 08/19/2004
: at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:
:
: Did you have some point to make?
:
: For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah. bush
: didn't do something dangerous and daring.
:
: You every fly an F-102? Hell, you ever fly at all?

Le'Turd is always "flying" on something over in a.m.r. He's one of our
few resident Bush-haters over there. I'd bet even money that Le'Turd's
mouth and an organ of Kerry's are a perfect match.


What you mean is I'm always saying things that make you rightwing assholes
confront your own lies --and you don't like it.

You could fix that by not being ever constant assholes, but since you
don't -- its probably a genetic defect controlling your guys.


:
:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:21:09 -0400, "sanjian"
wrote this crap:

wrote:
In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

Did you have some point to make?

For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah. bush
didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You every fly an F-102? Hell, you ever fly at all?


I flew to Florida last year.




My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."

In article qn7Vc.9852$zO3.3508@trndny05, wrote:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

In article 7QYUc.6516$_w.5361@trndny04, wrote:

Nonsense. -- If the F-102 was so dangerous to fly -- then how come it
was so easy to rig with automatic controls that could take it off and fly
it as drone? -- That's where most of them went -- target practice in
combat with our best -- all under remote control. E.g., that means it was
*easy to fly and *stable. (Or course you should have known that before
now, since duba did it).

The same was done with earlier jet (and some piston) fighters with even
worse safety records.

Did you have some point to make?

For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah.

I thought not.

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

"Steve Hix" wrote in message
...

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

Is it more difficult than eating pretzels and watching TV at the same time?

"Chas Hurst" wrote in
:


"Steve Hix" wrote in message
...

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

Is it more difficult than eating pretzels and watching TV at the same
time?

When everything is going well in straight and level or even
low G manoeuvering its probably easy enough to fly. However
the assumption is that sooner or later things will go south
really quickly and its those situations that set the standard.

IBM


__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

In , on 08/19/2004
at 09:00 PM, Steve Hix said:

In article qn7Vc.9852$zO3.3508@trndny05, wrote:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

In article 7QYUc.6516$_w.5361@trndny04, wrote:

Nonsense. -- If the F-102 was so dangerous to fly -- then how come it
was so easy to rig with automatic controls that could take it off and fly
it as drone? -- That's where most of them went -- target practice in
combat with our best -- all under remote control. E.g., that means it was
*easy to fly and *stable. (Or course you should have known that before
now, since duba did it).

The same was done with earlier jet (and some piston) fighters with even
worse safety records.

Did you have some point to make?

For **obtuse people like you how are here to love bush -- yeah.

I thought not.

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring. However, he did escape
going to war in Vietnam -- and topped it by going AWOL.

Steve Hix wrote in
:

In article qn7Vc.9852$zO3.3508@trndny05, wrote:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

In article 7QYUc.6516$_w.5361@trndny04, wrote:

Nonsense. -- If the F-102 was so dangerous to fly -- then how
come it was so easy to rig with automatic controls that could take
it off and fly it as drone? -- That's where most of them went --
target practice in combat with our best -- all under remote
control. E.g., that means it was *easy to fly and *stable. (Or
course you should have known that before now, since duba did it).

Drone target aircraft are not flown all that aggressively most
of the time. Certainly not as manoeuvering missile bait a la
Top Gun if only because situational awareness as regards your
opponent would be difficult to maintain.
Are you truly as clueless as you seem to be, LeTurd?

[snip]

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

Dangerous yes but thats inherent in the job.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

That and much else.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

In , on 08/20/2004
at 12:35 PM, IBM said:

Steve Hix wrote in
:

In article qn7Vc.9852$zO3.3508@trndny05, wrote:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

In article 7QYUc.6516$_w.5361@trndny04, wrote:

Nonsense. -- If the F-102 was so dangerous to fly -- then how
come it was so easy to rig with automatic controls that could take
it off and fly it as drone? -- That's where most of them went --
target practice in combat with our best -- all under remote
control. E.g., that means it was *easy to fly and *stable. (Or
course you should have known that before now, since duba did it).

Drone target aircraft are not flown all that aggressively most
of the time. Certainly not as manoeuvering missile bait a la
Top Gun if only because situational awareness as regards your
opponent would be difficult to maintain.
Are you truly as clueless as you seem to be, LeTurd?


--Your generalizations give away your trolling.

PS: NORAD missions during the time bush was in -- never included Top Gun
flying. It was all radar guided intercepts. E.g., if you can steer the
thing, you can do it.

-- Don't come back until your the brains to play with the big boys. --
That won't happen soon.



[snip]

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

Dangerous yes but thats inherent in the job.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

That and much else.


What you mean is I tell truths is simple words -- that make you upset. Its
because you're lying to yourself -- in fact you can't stand yourself --
but you don't have the discipline to just just up when you know you
should.







IBM

_________________________________________________ ______________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source