![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could be dangerous unless you are trained in formation flying. ;^)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 May 2005 00:12:48 GMT, Jose
wrote: Granted, the current rules are nonsense but that doesn't give these two nitwits the go ahead to fly into the restricted area. That's not how you fix stupid rules. That's how you get more stupid rules. Just idly thinking here after two glasses of wine, but what if =all= the spam cans in the country formed a line and flew directly over the white house at 2000 feet with no transponder code and no clearance, and kept doing it even as we were being shot down? What do you think the eventual effect of this would be? Jose A pilot shortage. Rich Russell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... Granted, the current rules are nonsense but that doesn't give these two nitwits the go ahead to fly into the restricted area. That's not how you fix stupid rules. That's how you get more stupid rules. Just idly thinking here after two glasses of wine, but what if =all= the spam cans in the country formed a line and flew directly over the white house at 2000 feet with no transponder code and no clearance, and kept doing it even as we were being shot down? What do you think the eventual effect of this would be? I love it: America hasn't had a decent civil disobedience protest for a while. The French population tried it on the Bastille in 1789. The US civil rights movement tried it many times during the 1950's and 60's. The students of Kent State tried it May 4, 1970. Americans killed 4 of them. From the outside looking in, I would expect the result to be similar to Kent State. A few Americans may die. The population may be outraged and recognize the futility of their government's policies, or it may nod its head sagely and say the pilots had it coming. It depends on whether they value "freedom and democracy", or prefer feudal dependance. Twenty or thirty years later everyone will wonder what all the fuss was about, because by then some other equally "important" disaster will have befallen.... and whether man-made or natural, physical or political or economic, it will come from a totally unexpected and unplanned-for source. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote:
On 11 May 2005 18:51:01 GMT, (Jay Masino) wrote: The latest report on WTOP (news station in DC) was that the aircraft WAS squawking the correct code, but that there was some sort of communications problem. I'm glad to see that everyone was so willing to jump on top of our brother pilots. The ADIZ procedures require immediate egress from the ADIZ upon lost comms through shortest-exit to the boundary. That restriction is only for lost TRANSPONDER capability. And of course it presumes that the pilot knows the transponder is out. It was added after the incident before Reagan's funeral. Issues with the ADIZ itself and problems created by pilots not following procedures therein have been not infrequent since it's inception. You can't blame the whole ADIZ piece of **** on pilots. It took badgering the FAA for over a year to get them to chart the blasted thing for example. The TRACON and the other political entities are still having ****ing matches over operations (or else the Kentucky governor fiasco wouldn't have happened either). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 May 2005 17:29:43 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote: Peter Clark wrote: On 11 May 2005 18:51:01 GMT, (Jay Masino) wrote: The latest report on WTOP (news station in DC) was that the aircraft WAS squawking the correct code, but that there was some sort of communications problem. I'm glad to see that everyone was so willing to jump on top of our brother pilots. The ADIZ procedures require immediate egress from the ADIZ upon lost comms through shortest-exit to the boundary. That restriction is only for lost TRANSPONDER capability. And of course it presumes that the pilot knows the transponder is out. K, I must have been confusing (or combining it) with another notam. You can't blame the whole ADIZ piece of **** on pilots. It took badgering the FAA for over a year to get them to chart the blasted thing for example. The TRACON and the other political entities are still having ****ing matches over operations (or else the Kentucky governor fiasco wouldn't have happened either). I'm not blaming the whole ADIZ fiasco on pilots, it's a ridiculous waste of energy to put on an ineffective show. But the area isn't an unknown any more, flying towards the prohibited airspace (unless they were vectored towards it?) contained within it isn't exactly smart even if you do have a transponder and 2way comms, and things like this make it more difficult on the people who want to but can't figure out how to get rid of it yet not have to admit it was the wrong thing to do in the first place. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote:
I'm not blaming the whole ADIZ fiasco on pilots, it's a ridiculous waste of energy to put on an ineffective show. But the area isn't an unknown any more, flying towards the prohibited airspace (unless they were vectored towards it?) contained within it isn't exactly smart even if you do have a transponder and 2way comms, and things like this make it more difficult on the people who want to but can't figure out how to get rid of it yet not have to admit it was the wrong thing to do in the first place. One of the local stations apparently interviewed the student pilot's wife (by phone). Apparently, he was well aware of the ADIZ and was worried about navigating around it (or through it with the proper squawk). It sounds to me like some kind of simple navigation problem that was allowed to expand to some level of disorientation. This is why a no-fly zone (enforced by deadly force) doesn't make any sense in a free society. Human beings make mistakes from time to time, and we're not living in the Soviet Union. --- Jay -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! ! http://www.oceancityairport.com http://www.oc-adolfos.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WOW!
One would have to be pretty stupid to fly over DC in todays world. I can understand the "No Fly Zone" policy, but I can't understand why all the cops in the area have to act like Soviet paratroopers are descending around Washington Monument. When onboard the USS Iwo Jima we almost had to shoot down a small GA plane in the Med. He invaded our airspace, after the second warning battle stations were called, all the cool anti aircraft machine guns and missles came online. The Captain had them try him one last time and he waved his wings and turned around. I often wonder if he actually realized how close to dying he was. So I can agree with most and say the DC police act like a bunch of bent out of shape Campfire Girls running around screaming , but if a US Warship has protected airspace..shouldn't the Capital of the US? What excuse could a pilot give in VFR conditions for being to close to DC? Oh I didn't know what DC looked like? I agree with the take their license away. The news channels were saying that it would take the plane 90 seconds to reach the Capital or White House from the 3 mile radius....bet that 3 mile becomes 10 miles soon. We can thank this latest idiot as well as the Governor of Kentucky's pilots! ![]() Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W P Dixon wrote:
WOW! One would have to be pretty stupid to fly over DC in todays world. I can understand the "No Fly Zone" policy, but I can't understand why all the cops in the area have to act like Soviet paratroopers are descending around Washington Monument. Yeah, well it was a student pilot for God's sake. Lets Burn him/her at the stake. When onboard the USS Iwo Jima we almost had to shoot down a small GA plane in the Med. He invaded our airspace, after the second warning battle stations were called, all the cool anti aircraft machine guns and missles came online. The Captain had them try him one last time and he waved his wings and turned around. I often wonder if he actually realized how close to dying he was. A military vessel at sea is a lot different than US city that is supposed to be the epitome of freedom in the civilized word. So I can agree with most and say the DC police act like a bunch of bent out of shape Campfire Girls running around screaming , but if a US Warship has protected airspace..shouldn't the Capital of the US? What excuse could a pilot give in VFR conditions for being to close to DC? Oh I didn't know what DC looked like? I agree with the take their license away. As I said, it was a stedent pilot... sheesh. And why not shut down the airspace around all US cities while we are at it? After all, Don Daley destroyed an airport in Chicago proportedly because of the "threat" of these dangerous GA aircraft. The news channels were saying that it would take the plane 90 seconds to reach the Capital or White House from the 3 mile radius....bet that 3 mile becomes 10 miles soon. We can thank this latest idiot as well as the Governor of Kentucky's pilots! ![]() Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Products | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |