A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

traitorous SOB



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old February 15th 04, 05:17 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...

And Barbra Streisand earns much more than that and no one has ever accused

her
of being intelligent.


You should see a doctor about your inferiority complex, Dan.


BWAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHHAHAHHHHAHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHHAHHA HHAHAHHAH

look in the mirror little man.
  #92  
Old February 15th 04, 05:56 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Phil Miller" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:43:25 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
. com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


John Kerry had his first marriage annulled and made his own

children
*******s.

I'm quite sure that you, OTOH, are a self-made man.

All five of my children are entitled to inherit.


...six crates of empty Thunderbird liquor bottles and some of the worlds
wackiest aeroplane parts and theories.


Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to
usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #93  
Old February 15th 04, 02:53 PM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"running with scissors" wrote in
message m...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...
"Phil Miller" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:43:25 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
. com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...


John Kerry had his first marriage annulled and made his own

children
*******s.

I'm quite sure that you, OTOH, are a self-made man.

All five of my children are entitled to inherit.

...six crates of empty Thunderbird liquor bottles and some of the

worlds
wackiest aeroplane parts and theories.


Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to
usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.


yes of course you are little man. in rupees maybe.


Nah, the royalty check for calendar year 2003 came in last month.

The people who now do his job are paid in rupees. They're having a little
trouble translating splap and 8-track into Urdu, though.



  #94  
Old February 15th 04, 03:52 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.com...


Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to
usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.


About twice what is paid around here.


  #95  
Old February 15th 04, 03:58 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:


About par for a mid level EE.


About twice what is paid around here.


Guess ya' have to have a head full of bad wiring in order to become
an EE, huh Tarv?



  #96  
Old February 15th 04, 04:55 PM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.com...

Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post

to usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.


About twice what is paid around here.


Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C.

Not counting your returns on wine bottle deposits, of course.


  #97  
Old February 15th 04, 05:20 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Mazor" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.com...

Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever

post
to usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.


About twice what is paid around here.


Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C.


Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me, Mazor.

Besides that, a schedule C always beats a 1040.


  #98  
Old February 15th 04, 06:03 PM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"John Mazor" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.com...

Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever

post
to usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.

About twice what is paid around here.


Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule

C.

Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me,

Mazor.

We settled that long ago, you were full of gerbil dung, then and now.

Besides that, a schedule C always beats a 1040.


Nope. Since a Schedule C is a mere subset of a 1040, Line 40 doesn't give a
damn where it came from.

Granting, of course, that only a Schedule C filer can claim depreciation on
inventories of returnable wine bottles.


  #99  
Old February 15th 04, 06:17 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Mazor" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"John Mazor" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.com...

Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever

post
to usenet.

I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month.

About par for a mid level EE.

About twice what is paid around here.

Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your

Schedule
C.

Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me,

Mazor.

We settled that long ago, you were full of gerbil dung, then and now.


You mean you failed to pay off on a bet, Mazor.

There is no "we" to it.


  #100  
Old February 16th 04, 12:24 AM
Evan Brennan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed Rasimus wrote in message . ..
Regardless of the objective, the fact is that the US has NEVER after a war
expressed any form of imperialism.



What about the Spanish-American war? We took over the Philippines and
later granted their independence. Since 1898, US tax dollars have
frequently crushed guerrilla uprisings in the Philippines.


We don't keep the territory we take with our blood and treasure. We
rebuild it, establish a democracy and then make a partnership with
them as the become economic giants.



That is essentially true, but since we expect a return on investments,
it is more accurate to say the United States has used a more subtle
form of imperialism -- by focusing on economic controls and
preferential trade agreements where possible -- with little or no
emphasis on colonization or direct rule. This is unlike British and
French imperialism which was more all-encompassing; they too wanted
economic control but usually accomplished it through a more direct
style of rule.

Other times Uncle Sam acts against a specific country because we are
more interested in regional stability, such as the current situation
in Iraq. If you are implying that Iraqi oil itelf was not a
significant motive for our invasion, then I agree.


It simply doesn't track that we would suddenly revert to some sort of
oppressive colonial policy.



But military action in the interest of regional stability is just
another way of preserving US financial interests, which by extention
also means preserving our internal security. We have a right to do
just that, and we will exercise that right, whether WMD is involved or
not. If George Z. Bush and Art Kramer disagree, they can always move
to France.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.