![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message ... And Barbra Streisand earns much more than that and no one has ever accused her of being intelligent. You should see a doctor about your inferiority complex, Dan. BWAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHHAHAHHHHAHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHHAHHA HHAHAHHAH look in the mirror little man. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Phil Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:43:25 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message . com... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... John Kerry had his first marriage annulled and made his own children *******s. I'm quite sure that you, OTOH, are a self-made man. All five of my children are entitled to inherit. ...six crates of empty Thunderbird liquor bottles and some of the worlds wackiest aeroplane parts and theories. Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"running with scissors" wrote in
message m... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Phil Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:43:25 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message . com... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... John Kerry had his first marriage annulled and made his own children *******s. I'm quite sure that you, OTOH, are a self-made man. All five of my children are entitled to inherit. ...six crates of empty Thunderbird liquor bottles and some of the worlds wackiest aeroplane parts and theories. Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. yes of course you are little man. in rupees maybe. Nah, the royalty check for calendar year 2003 came in last month. The people who now do his job are paid in rupees. They're having a little trouble translating splap and 8-track into Urdu, though. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .com... Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote: About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. Guess ya' have to have a head full of bad wiring in order to become an EE, huh Tarv? |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .com... Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C. Not counting your returns on wine bottle deposits, of course. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Mazor" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .com... Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C. Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me, Mazor. Besides that, a schedule C always beats a 1040. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
... "John Mazor" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .com... Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C. Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me, Mazor. We settled that long ago, you were full of gerbil dung, then and now. Besides that, a schedule C always beats a 1040. Nope. Since a Schedule C is a mere subset of a 1040, Line 40 doesn't give a damn where it came from. Granting, of course, that only a Schedule C filer can claim depreciation on inventories of returnable wine bottles. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Mazor" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "John Mazor" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .com... Either that Miller, or you are one of the biggest idiotd to ever post to usenet. I'll give you a hint: I am making ten grand a month. About par for a mid level EE. About twice what is paid around here. Even taking your claim at face value, my 1040 still beats your Schedule C. Good, then you should have no problem paying th $100,000 you own me, Mazor. We settled that long ago, you were full of gerbil dung, then and now. You mean you failed to pay off on a bet, Mazor. There is no "we" to it. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote in message . ..
Regardless of the objective, the fact is that the US has NEVER after a war expressed any form of imperialism. What about the Spanish-American war? We took over the Philippines and later granted their independence. Since 1898, US tax dollars have frequently crushed guerrilla uprisings in the Philippines. We don't keep the territory we take with our blood and treasure. We rebuild it, establish a democracy and then make a partnership with them as the become economic giants. That is essentially true, but since we expect a return on investments, it is more accurate to say the United States has used a more subtle form of imperialism -- by focusing on economic controls and preferential trade agreements where possible -- with little or no emphasis on colonization or direct rule. This is unlike British and French imperialism which was more all-encompassing; they too wanted economic control but usually accomplished it through a more direct style of rule. Other times Uncle Sam acts against a specific country because we are more interested in regional stability, such as the current situation in Iraq. If you are implying that Iraqi oil itelf was not a significant motive for our invasion, then I agree. It simply doesn't track that we would suddenly revert to some sort of oppressive colonial policy. But military action in the interest of regional stability is just another way of preserving US financial interests, which by extention also means preserving our internal security. We have a right to do just that, and we will exercise that right, whether WMD is involved or not. If George Z. Bush and Art Kramer disagree, they can always move to France. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|