Cessna 172R from Telluride to Aspen

Tina writes:

Your (attempted) superior attidude ...

I don't have a superior attitude. I simply cannot be intimidated into
submission to people who have not proved themselves worthy of respect. People
call that a "superior attitude" to try to make it seem that it's my problem,
rather than theirs.

Did you know many sel airplanes burn as much value in fuel
an hour as you can afford to eat on in a week?

Yes. So? It's an expensive hobby.

writes:

But it was a tragedy according to you.

It would have been a tragedy if the simulation were real. It is a tragedy
within the simulated environment.

Are you so heartless you would deny the simulated survivors the chance
for simulated mourning?

It's a flight simulation.

writes:

The legally required ones, e.g. possession of all requried paperwork
and manuals, route planning, preflight of aircraft, weather and
NOTAM check, etc.

Having required paperwork increases safety?

How dense can you be?

Orders of magnitude more than I am. And I see extreme examples that bring
John Bradford's most famous words to mind.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The legally required ones, e.g. possession of all requried paperwork
and manuals, route planning, preflight of aircraft, weather and
NOTAM check, etc.

Having required paperwork increases safety?

Non sequitur.

You are grasping at straws in an attempt to back out of your bone
headed question.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in news
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The legally required ones, e.g. possession of all requried paperwork
and manuals, route planning, preflight of aircraft, weather and
NOTAM check, etc.

Having required paperwork increases safety?

Non sequitur.

You are grasping at straws in an attempt to back out of your bone
headed question.



Isn't it amazing how Anthony, who a few years back tried to post as though
he was a pilot ("Last night when I flew from Phoenix to Las Vegas in my
Baron") is now asking questions about simple things like when to use boost
pumps. Something anyone who ever flew a Baron would know.

On May 13, 6:12*am, gatt wrote:
wrote:
No. *It's just a flight simulation.

But it was a tragedy according to you.

Are you so heartless you would deny the simulated survivors the chance
for simulated mourning?

Not to mention simulated cannibalism if they're stranded in the
simulated mountains.

Hey, that might be a cool mod. *The last one I installed was a Jeep.
REALLY bad aerodynamics. * I installed the Black Stallion horse for my
wife. *That one's a blast because you're getting up to speed down the
runway, cloppity-cloppity-cloppity, and if you turn too suddenly and the
horse tips, it makes an great plane-crash explosion sound. *It doesn't
amuse the missus much, but I love to sit on the edge of the runway and
run out in front of it right as it's about to land.


Might be even more fun to install a bulldozer. Flies like crap except
in a dive after slewing to FL20 but imagine the fun watching the
wife's stallion trying to run backwards on late final. I can see it
now, legs whirling in reverse in a blur of panic. LOL

Cheers

On May 13, 7:46*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
Your (attempted) superior attidude ...

I don't have a superior attitude. *I simply cannot be intimidated into
submission to people who have not proved themselves worthy of respect. *People
call that a "superior attitude" to try to make it seem that it's my problem,
rather than theirs.

Did you know many sel airplanes burn as much value in fuel
an hour as you can afford to eat on in a week?

Yes. *So? *It's an expensive hobby.

No, you are poor.

Cheers

Mxsmanic writes:

A crash in simulation is a tragedy within the context of that simulation.

First, the MSFS is not a real simulation, its a game, trying to appear
like one. A Crash within MSFS is just a failure with no consequences.

If you play MSFS regularly, you should know it's limitations.

I just tried you "experiment" and were scared by the low climb rate of
the Cessna in that altitude. You cannot even try the Bertie-Turn home
after takeoff.

Aircraft manufacturers spend a great deal of money on simulation of normal and
extreme situations, involving things that nobody would ever attempt in real
life. Why do you think they do that?

Even the real big flight simulators are limited to the input data they
have. And to my knowledge, not much data from unusual flight envelopes
(stalls, spins whatever) is inserted in these things.

So creating safety procedures from simulation can be dangerous. American
Airlines Flight 587 might be an potential example.

cu

Disclaimer: IANAP - I am not a pilot. Therefore, the whole message above
might be, could be, should be and most probably is, utterly nonsense.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Nomen Nescio writes:

What have you done to prove yourself worthy of respect?

When have I asked for respect?


You ask for it in almost every post, you whiney cretin.

Bertie

Tina wrote:
Your (attempted) superior attidude reminds me of
some studies that were done on MD pilots a long time ago, and maybe
JFK Jrs at that time: their attitude of whatever - being superior? --
led to an increased accident rate.



Have a reference for those studies?