DUI Conviction

nobody writes:

Looks like a typo.

It's not.

You mean you *make* things up, don't you?

No.

gatt writes:

Thanks, jackass. We'll all take that under consideration.

How much consideration does it take?

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Thanks, jackass. We'll all take that under consideration.

How much consideration does it take?

If it is coming from you, none.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

nobody writes:

Looks like a typo.

It's not.

You mean you *make* things up, don't you?

No.


Every one of your posts about flying an airplane is either made up or an
incompetent cut & paste Anthony. You are talking through your asshole.

Nomen Nescio writes:

Seeing that you consider sipping one drop of wine to be impaired,
that doesn't surprise me.

I consider any alcohol in the blood to carry a risk of impairment.

Yea, I have.
My wife's got 2 brothers who are cops.

So any cop's test of impairment is reliable? In which case, if any cop says
you are impaired, he's right? Be careful what you wish for.

I can easily pass the "field sobriety tests" at twice the legal
limit.

But are you impaired that that level? Everyone else is. Why wouldn't you be?

I've never tested it, but I could probably fly just fine with a .08.

Just don't fly anywhere near me. People who think they can "hold their
liquor" are tremendously dangerous in both cars and aircraft.

writes:

If it is coming from you, none.

So you agree that any alcohol at all is too much when operating a vehicle?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
B A R R Y writes:

You can get a DUI for driving under the influence of spray paint or
properly prescribed meds, too.

You can lose your pilot's license the same way.

That's one reason why it's best to avoid drugs that cause impairment when
driving or flying. I should think that concern for safety would be the
overriding reason, but some people don't care about safety--they only care
about being able to do unwise things without getting caught.

How about driving while impaired by age? It's the same as any other
impairment, isn't it?

Why is that particular form of impairment acceptable?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:


If it is coming from you, none.


So you agree that any alcohol at all is too much when operating a vehicle?



Nope.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Nomen Nescio writes:

Seeing that you consider sipping one drop of wine to be impaired,
that doesn't surprise me.

I consider any alcohol in the blood to carry a risk of impairment.

No one here cares what you concider about anything.

Yea, I have.
My wife's got 2 brothers who are cops.

So any cop's test of impairment is reliable? In which case, if any cop says
you are impaired, he's right? Be careful what you wish for.

Maybe, maybe not, but the cop's test is the legal test.

I can easily pass the "field sobriety tests" at twice the legal
limit.

But are you impaired that that level? Everyone else is. Why wouldn't you be?

No, everyone else is not.

If you had actually read the "literature" you said you read in a previous
post, you would know that levels are set on a statistical basis, which
means there are those that will be "impaired" at very low levels
and those that will not be "impaired" at very high levels.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

If it is coming from you, none.

So you agree that any alcohol at all is too much when operating a vehicle?

No, that is obviously an ignorant and incorrect statement.

I agree that nothing you say is worth concideration.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.