![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I guess this it for Leturd.
By now. "Sharky" wrote in message ... In Fp5Wc.93380$Lj.67534@fed1read03, sanjian wrote: Le'turd spent several years in the federal pen for his obsession over young children. He's still considered a danger to society, but now only the male children need close supervision when he's around. Unless you have proof, that really doesn't help any. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html http://www.hcso.org/records/qryByZip... ode%5D=herzog |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , on 08/22/2004
at 11:51 PM, said: Well, I guess this it for Leturd. By now. Sorry asshole -- I would have hoped the texas school system was capable of teaching you how to research something, but it obviously can't. There is no connection to anything you and sharky and the other rightwing assholes here whined about -- except in your ****ed up brains. Now what is the worth of that ranch you have -- that I will win in court? "Sharky" wrote in message .. . In Fp5Wc.93380$Lj.67534@fed1read03, sanjian wrote: Le'turd spent several years in the federal pen for his obsession over young children. He's still considered a danger to society, but now only the male children need close supervision when he's around. Unless you have proof, that really doesn't help any. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html http://www.hcso.org/records/qryByZip... ode%5D=herzog |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there is a resemblance. Yep, it looks like him, look at
that guilty looking face. "Sharky" wrote in message ... http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html You can check for yourself by searching google groups. The similarity in posting style is uncanny, and leturd still refuses to deny he's not. If it's not him, he's gotta be related in some way. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sharky wrote:
In Fp5Wc.93380$Lj.67534@fed1read03, sanjian wrote: Sharky wrote: In , BigRedWingsFan wrote: wrote in message news:J4PVc.11303$3O2.1092@trndny07... Now grow up, or see the shrink. They have drugs now for delusional assholes like you. Too bad you're not eligible for VA care, they have nice padded rooms for fruitcakes like you. Le'turd spent several years in the federal pen for his obsession over young children. He's still considered a danger to society, but now only the male children need close supervision when he's around. Unless you have proof, that really doesn't help any. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html http://www.hcso.org/records/qryByZip... ode%5D=herzog I guess the missing piece of evidence would be something saying that this Herzog guy is letoured... |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sharky wrote:
In YSwWc.12833$ni.7672@okepread01, sanjian wrote: Unless you have proof, that really doesn't help any. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html http://www.hcso.org/records/qryByZip... ode%5D=herzog I guess the missing piece of evidence would be something saying that this Herzog guy is letoured... You can check for yourself by searching google groups. The similarity in posting style is uncanny, and leturd still refuses to deny he's not. If it's not him, he's gotta be related in some way. Seems a bit shakey. I'm sure, if I looked hard enough, I could find a child molester to match the writing style of anyone, from Shakespeare to Ted Kazinski. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry asshole -- but you couldn't possible know what I look like -- yet you think you do -- that meets the definition of insanity used by shrinks. See one tomorrow. In , on 08/23/2004 at 10:24 PM, said: I think there is a resemblance. Yep, it looks like him, look at that guilty looking face. "Sharky" wrote in message .. . http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html You can check for yourself by searching google groups. The similarity in posting style is uncanny, and leturd still refuses to deny he's not. If it's not him, he's gotta be related in some way. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry assholes but you lose. -- You rightwing dumb****s libel when you have nothing else to say, and you know you're wrong. In YSwWc.12833$ni.7672@okepread01, on 08/23/2004 at 09:30 PM, "sanjian" said: Sharky wrote: In Fp5Wc.93380$Lj.67534@fed1read03, sanjian wrote: Sharky wrote: In , BigRedWingsFan wrote: wrote in message news:J4PVc.11303$3O2.1092@trndny07... Now grow up, or see the shrink. They have drugs now for delusional assholes like you. Too bad you're not eligible for VA care, they have nice padded rooms for fruitcakes like you. Le'turd spent several years in the federal pen for his obsession over young children. He's still considered a danger to society, but now only the male children need close supervision when he's around. Unless you have proof, that really doesn't help any. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html http://www.hcso.org/records/qryByZip... ode%5D=herzog I guess the missing piece of evidence would be something saying that this Herzog guy is letoured... |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:54:10 GMT, wrote:
[followups set] Sorry asshole -- but you couldn't possible know what I look like -- yet you think you do -- that meets the definition of insanity used by shrinks. See one tomorrow. What exactly did they lose? Dave -- You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us! US Army Signal Corps!! http://www.geocities.com/davidcasey98 Remove IH8SPAM to reply by email. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Asshole, you see nothing -- Since I'm the person you are libeling. But hey it interesting to see you rightwing nuts try and figure out who I am. It tell me that I'm hitting you little morons dead on with truth -- that has you squirming. PS: Do you know the statute of limitations for libel? -- I'd find out if I were you. But then I have a working brain. You rightwingers don't. In , on 08/24/2004 at 01:01 AM, Sharky said: I can just see the schizophrenic mind of turdy claiming it's his long lost twin. But then we all know the real truth... In , wrote: I think there is a resemblance. Yep, it looks like him, look at that guilty looking face. "Sharky" wrote in message . .. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/199...porn_case.html http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...guilty_to.html You can check for yourself by searching google groups. The similarity in posting style is uncanny, and leturd still refuses to deny he's not. If it's not him, he's gotta be related in some way. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ...
"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message ... ... Who really cares if YOU are impressed or not? There was a continuing effort to work with ricin as a weapon. That work was in violation of the restrictions placed upon them. There were other violations noted as well. All of those are FACTS. As to *your* assessment of dual-use facilities, ricin, etc....gee, I am gonna kind of believe that Kay, with his background, knows more about them than YOU do--or are you going to give us a CV that proves otherwise? Iraq was not enriching Uranium and was nowhere near having an operable reactor and we knew that for certain. Uranium enrichment programs and reactors release noble gases that can be detected over long distances--that is how we know North Korea has reprocessed fuel rods. Besides, the IAEA did certify that Iraq was in compliance with the nuclear requirements. Iraq's complaince with the UN mandatres on chemical and biological weapons was still an open issue when the invasion began. However UNMOVIC and IAEA both reported that they had been receiving full cooperation form Iraq. One very important reason why UNMOVIC had not certified Iraqi compliance at the time of the invasion was becuase they were misinformed, by the US. We kept telling them to inspect sites, they kept inspecting them and kept finding nothing. One UNMOVIC inspector summarized the US intelligence as '****'. It is clear that the Bush administrations sabotaged the UNMOVIC inspections by providing UNMOVIC with false information. THe motive is clear, to prevent UNMOVIC from certifying that Iraq was in compliance. But let us agree that there we some violations of the letter of the prohibitions iethout regard to whether or not UNMOVIC would have discovered them The real question is if those violations justify the invasion. Tha answer is clearly no because dormant and bench scale research programs did not present an imminent danger. There was time to deal with those by other means, discovery by UNMOVIC, revolution, coup, assasination by the Israelis, death by accidental or natural causes, surgical strikes, any number of things might have kept Iraq from aquiring stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons. The rapid success of the in- vasion and the post-invastion evidence shows that the sanctions were efffective in keeping Iraq militarily weak altogether, both conventionally and nonconventionally. There is no doubt of the potential for danger, but also no doubt that actual danger was at least years away. IMHO, even stockpiles of useable biological and chemical weapons did not present a threat to the US or to Iraq's neighbors because Saddam Hussein dared not use them for fear of US retaliation. That was my position befor the invasion and it remains the same today. They would be useless against the US becuase Biological and Chemical weapons are useless without aircraft or arrillery to deliver them and neither would survive long enough to fire for effect in an engagement against US forces. The purpose of the invasion was to be preemptive, not punitive. We didn't preempt anything was less than several years in the future. We did succeed in punishing Saddam Hussein, but at what cost? The price is yet to be determined in full. who had the capability of producing weapons of mass destruction Yeah, they did, and what's more they were continuing proscribed WMD programs up until the outbreak of armed hostilities. The only program shown to be active was the Al Hussein missle program. Those only exceeded the allowed range in a zero payoad no guidance test, and only barely so. Much as I hate to agree with the former Iraqi regime on anything honesty requires that I agree that AH missles were arguably within the proscribed limits. Notwithstanding, Iraq agreed to allow them to be detroyed. Iraq complied (albeit grudingly) with our demands, and we invaded them anyways. This no longer even is a claim that Saddam had the intent of producing WMD, only the capability; Do you seriously doubt that Saddam would not have reopened production ASAP if he had been allowed to? I gave you credit for possessing a bit more common sense than that. I don't think anyone seriously doubted that Saddam Hussein would have resumed WMD production if he could have. The argument against the invasion was that he had not and could not in the immediate future. When Bush made the claim that those of us who opposed the invasion thought that Hussein could be trusted he lied to you. We never thought that at all. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
"You Might be a Crew Chief if..." | Yeff | Military Aviation | 36 | December 11th 03 04:07 PM |
Trexler now 7th Air Force commander | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 27th 03 11:32 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |