![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My altitude was excessive - I was that close-in doing the teardrop. I
accepted I would probably overrun 9R with the tailwind, but somehow it didn't happen. In hindsight, I wonder if maybe I might have been able to nurse it around the pattern at partial throttle, but there just wasn't time to do any experimenting. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nrp wrote:
My altitude was excessive - I was that close-in doing the teardrop. I accepted I would probably overrun 9R with the tailwind, but somehow it didn't happen. I'm glad it worked out for you, and I'm sure that your perspective has been enhanced by that experience. I encourage everyone to compare performance charts for your aircraft's takeoff over a fifty foot obstacle v landing over a fifty foot obstacle, with and without flaps. That can be very illuminating in trying to get a mental picture of what to expect when tempted to do a "180" back to the runway after engine failure on takeoff. A comparison of full flap rates of descent v takeoff climb rates for the given atmospheric conditions can also be quite handy to have previously sorted out. When one gets in the habit of making power-on approaches in light planes, which most do, the angle and rate of descent of the power-off, full flap approach can be a surprise. Airspeed control throughout MUST be precise to achieve the book figures for the configuration used. A study of the feasibility of turnbacks after engine failure has been published on the web, and the parameters for success should be well understood by all of us. http://www.nar-associates.com/techni.../possible.html and, http://www.nar-associates.com/techni...e/aiaa1col.pdf In the sailplane community we actually get to practice this sort of thing (the "rope-break" on departure, or "pt3" -- premature termination of the tow) as part of our basic training, and on BFR's. However, I know of none who teach, demonstrate, and/or practice it in the power community -- for what most would consider good reasons. Still, there's nothing like having seen it, or as close a simulation of it as you can safely manage with an experienced instructor, before you need either to do it, or to decide not to do it, for real. In helicopter operations a comparable thing (auto-rotations to a landing) is a normal part of training. In fixed-wing ops, for those times when landing straight ahead or within 90 degrees or less of the runway heading is not a good option, we need to think anew about the kind of training we are giving and getting. With the ever-increasing encroachment of development around our established airports, there are fewer and fewer acceptable alternatives for emergency landings in single engine operations. Jack |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't recommend anyone to do what I did especially at 400 hrs TT.
I can remember though that the forced landing situation got much better as I turned left from 270 deg heading. I don't think it was my plan to do a full 180 until I realized that there was still enough altitude left for another 90. I was scared of a stall or spin but the airspeed was there according to the A/S indicator so I just kept coming around with those barndoor flaps down. The real problem was getting back to the runway after over correcting. The real pro in this was the tower controller, who caught my only transmission ("gotta problemdoinga180"), made someone go around on that parallel runway, then shut up & watched. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't recommend anyone to do what I did especially at 400 hrs TT.
I can remember though that the forced landing situation got much better as I turned left from 270 deg heading. I don't think it was my plan to do a full 180 until I realized that there was still enough altitude left for another 90. I was scared of a stall or spin but the airspeed was there according to the A/S indicator so I just kept coming around with those b ig barndoor flaps down. The real problem was getting back to the runway after over correcting. The real pro in this was the tower controller, who caught my initial transmission (gotta problemdoinga180), made someone go around on that parallel runway, then shut up & watched. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eScrew zen story | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 20th 04 07:19 AM |
Funny story about naval | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 20th 04 03:37 AM |
Funny story about piloting | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | December 20th 04 12:34 AM |
Amazing, True Story and Lessons | jsmith | Piloting | 5 | March 24th 04 03:32 PM |
PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? | Brian | Military Aviation | 77 | August 2nd 03 11:15 AM |