A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Big scare story



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old December 12th 05, 06:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big scare story

My altitude was excessive - I was that close-in doing the teardrop. I
accepted I would probably overrun 9R with the tailwind, but somehow it
didn't happen.

In hindsight, I wonder if maybe I might have been able to nurse it
around the pattern at partial throttle, but there just wasn't time to
do any experimenting.

  #102  
Old December 13th 05, 12:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big scare story

nrp wrote:
My altitude was excessive - I was that close-in doing the teardrop. I
accepted I would probably overrun 9R with the tailwind, but somehow it
didn't happen.


I'm glad it worked out for you, and I'm sure that your perspective has
been enhanced by that experience.

I encourage everyone to compare performance charts for your aircraft's
takeoff over a fifty foot obstacle v landing over a fifty foot obstacle,
with and without flaps. That can be very illuminating in trying to get a
mental picture of what to expect when tempted to do a "180" back to the
runway after engine failure on takeoff. A comparison of full flap rates
of descent v takeoff climb rates for the given atmospheric conditions
can also be quite handy to have previously sorted out. When one gets in
the habit of making power-on approaches in light planes, which most do,
the angle and rate of descent of the power-off, full flap approach can
be a surprise. Airspeed control throughout MUST be precise to achieve
the book figures for the configuration used.

A study of the feasibility of turnbacks after engine failure has been
published on the web, and the parameters for success should be well
understood by all of us.

http://www.nar-associates.com/techni.../possible.html

and,

http://www.nar-associates.com/techni...e/aiaa1col.pdf


In the sailplane community we actually get to practice this sort of
thing (the "rope-break" on departure, or "pt3" -- premature termination
of the tow) as part of our basic training, and on BFR's. However, I know
of none who teach, demonstrate, and/or practice it in the power
community -- for what most would consider good reasons. Still, there's
nothing like having seen it, or as close a simulation of it as you can
safely manage with an experienced instructor, before you need either to
do it, or to decide not to do it, for real.

In helicopter operations a comparable thing (auto-rotations to a
landing) is a normal part of training. In fixed-wing ops, for those
times when landing straight ahead or within 90 degrees or less of the
runway heading is not a good option, we need to think anew about the
kind of training we are giving and getting. With the ever-increasing
encroachment of development around our established airports, there are
fewer and fewer acceptable alternatives for emergency landings in single
engine operations.


Jack
  #103  
Old December 13th 05, 02:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big scare story

I wouldn't recommend anyone to do what I did especially at 400 hrs TT.
I can remember though that the forced landing situation got much better
as I turned left from 270 deg heading. I don't think it was my plan to
do a full 180 until I realized that there was still enough altitude
left for another 90. I was scared of a stall or spin but the airspeed
was there according to the A/S indicator so I just kept coming around
with those barndoor flaps down. The real problem was getting back to
the runway after over correcting.

The real pro in this was the tower controller, who caught my only
transmission ("gotta problemdoinga180"), made someone go around on that
parallel runway, then shut up & watched.

  #104  
Old December 13th 05, 02:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Big scare story

I wouldn't recommend anyone to do what I did especially at 400 hrs TT.
I can remember though that the forced landing situation got much better
as I turned left from 270 deg heading. I don't think it was my plan to
do a full 180 until I realized that there was still enough altitude
left for another 90. I was scared of a stall or spin but the airspeed
was there according to the A/S indicator so I just kept coming around
with those b ig barndoor flaps down. The real problem was getting back
to the runway after over correcting.

The real pro in this was the tower controller, who caught my initial
transmission (gotta problemdoinga180), made someone go around on that
parallel runway, then shut up & watched.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
eScrew zen story [email protected] Owning 0 December 20th 04 07:19 AM
Funny story about naval [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 December 20th 04 03:37 AM
Funny story about piloting [email protected] Piloting 0 December 20th 04 12:34 AM
Amazing, True Story and Lessons jsmith Piloting 5 March 24th 04 03:32 PM
PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? Brian Military Aviation 77 August 2nd 03 11:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.