If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking
country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? For the peer competitor,even more accelerated downsizing classical military power and even more accelerated development of HPM weapons. For others, more attack platforms guided by Mk.I eyeballs and armed with box cutters. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:28:28 GMT, Charles Gray wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 03:22:52 +0000, ess (phil hunt) wrote: What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? Concentrate on training and developing a professional officers corps. No matter the technology if your soldiers are uneducated draftees who don't want ot be there, and your officers were chosen for: "Who paid the highest bribe" or "who is least likely to be able to carry off a coup", you'll get your butt kicked. This is very sensible advice. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse the last two letters). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"phil hunt" wrote in message . .. What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? One word: Surrender |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:11:31 -0500, "Ray Drouillard"
wrote: "phil hunt" wrote in message ... What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? One word: Surrender And don't wait - surrender right now! We are Borg, your ass will be immolated. (Sorry, but I couldn't resist). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Ray Drouillard" wrote in message ...
"phil hunt" wrote in message . .. What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? One word: Surrender Precisely, and make that about March 10th 2003. It's the Grand Fenwick strategy, you lose, retain all of your weaponry that counts, and drag the opponent into a situation where he can't win. An armory of AK-47s, ammo, RPGs, ammo, Land mines, Mortar rounds, whatever you can bury in your front, or back, yard. General Van Riper told us this back in August 2002. We said he was cheating. No one remembers 'alls fair in...' http://sgtstryker.com.cr.sabren.com/...?entry_id=2887 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Gray" wrote in message ... On 19 Dec 2003 15:42:36 -0800, (Jack Linthicum) wrote: "Ray Drouillard" wrote in message ... "phil hunt" wrote in message . .. What would be sensible strategies/weapons for a middle-ranking country to employ if it thought it is likely to be involved in a war against the USA or other Western countries, say in the next 10 years? One word: Surrender Precisely, and make that about March 10th 2003. It's the Grand Fenwick strategy, you lose, retain all of your weaponry that counts, and drag the opponent into a situation where he can't win. An armory of AK-47s, ammo, RPGs, ammo, Land mines, Mortar rounds, whatever you can bury in your front, or back, yard. General Van Riper told us this back in August 2002. We said he was cheating. No one remembers 'alls fair in...' Or just avoid the whole invasion to begin with. Right up until the final ultimatum, Saddam probably could have avoided an invasion with unconditional surrender of all bases, etc, to U.S. inspection. Would we have let him stay in power? Would he have survived the loss of prestige? I don't know, but his chances were sure as hell higher than getting into a shooting match with the United States. He was left in power ten years ago. I think that GWB has learned from his father's mistake, however. In other cases, a non-despotic leader will probably be able to retain power. Ray Drouillard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia F111 to be scrapped!! | John Cook | Military Aviation | 35 | November 10th 03 11:46 PM |