A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How safe is it, really?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 2nd 04, 03:28 AM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mike Rapoport" writes:

So the bottom line here is that the accident rate for personal flying is
about twice the figure that pilots like to start with!


OK, let's say that's true.

You still don't address our basic premise, which is that

1. A large fraction of the total Personal Flying accident rate is
composed of pilot-controllable causes: flying into marginal weather,
buzzing, etc.

2. The poster's hubby, if he's a careful fellow, can reduce that
fraction of accidents and thus be pretty safe--perhaps approaching
ground vehicle safety, perhaps not, but certainly reducing his
personal accident rate below the average rate, whatever it is.

I still would say that one's personal flying accident rate is probably
going to be higher than one's personal driving accident rate, but it
need not conform to average statistical rates, because flying
accidents are more preventable than driving accidents.

  #2  
Old December 2nd 04, 06:04 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...
"Mike Rapoport" writes:

So the bottom line here is that the accident rate for personal flying is
about twice the figure that pilots like to start with!


OK, let's say that's true.

You still don't address our basic premise, which is that

1. A large fraction of the total Personal Flying accident rate is
composed of pilot-controllable causes: flying into marginal weather,
buzzing, etc.

2. The poster's hubby, if he's a careful fellow, can reduce that
fraction of accidents and thus be pretty safe--perhaps approaching
ground vehicle safety, perhaps not, but certainly reducing his
personal accident rate below the average rate, whatever it is.

I still would say that one's personal flying accident rate is probably
going to be higher than one's personal driving accident rate, but it
need not conform to average statistical rates, because flying
accidents are more preventable than driving accidents.



OK thats fair, I never objected that pilots don't have some control over the
risk. I object to the notion that they can reduce their accident risk by
90% or so and I object to the practice of using numbers that have much safer
flying included. The reality is that a *lot* of fatal personal flying
accidents are not marginal weather or stupid pilot tricks. Only 13% of
fatal accidents are attributed to weather and presumably VFR into IMC is
only a portion of this. Mechanical/maitenance is 14% and we an not talking
about lack of maitenance we are talking about maitenance errors. Only 6% of
the 70% pilot related accidents are attributed to fuel mis-management.
There are a *lot* of accidents that aren't avoided by prudence. We might as
well accept that.

Mike
MU-2


  #3  
Old December 3rd 04, 06:06 PM
Brian Case
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Just fun I took a detailed look at a random sample of accidents from
the NTSB Web Site.

Admittedly this is just a small random sample and may or probably not
be representative of the overall statistics. Also some interpretation
as to what happened each of these accidents is involved.

I Selected the Month of May 2004 as being a likely month of slightly
above average General aviation Activity. Currently I have only looked
at May 1 thru May 15th.

I included only Single engine General Aviation activities.

Here is a summary of these dates:

54 total accidents or incidents

5 accidents had Fatalities. Fatal accident rate = 9.2%
I read this to mean if involved in an accident there is a 9.2%
chance of a fatality occurring or a 91.8% chance it will not be fatal.
Fatal Causes we IMC Weather, Unknown loss of control, flying low,
Off airport landing, Pilot skill issue.

16 Mechanical related accidents, at least 3 should have been
preventable with better pilot skill or judgment.
INTERESTING: NONE OF THE MECHNICALS WERE FATAL

13 Pilot Skill related accident where better pilot skills or judgement
would likely have prevented. Only one of these was FATAL.

7 Fuel Related accidents (Ran out, Contaminated, or did not manage
properly)

3 due to flying to low

5 due to Instructor Skill/Judgment ie. The instructor should have
prevented it.

2 due to off airport landings

2 Turbulance

1 Other – Backhoe backed into a taxing airplane

1 IMC conditions

1 Unknown – Loss of control for unknown reasons


Note this does not say anything about how safe flying is, since it
does not reference at all how much total flight time or was flown
during this time period. All it does say is the "Crashing is
dangerous" and if you crash here are the statistics as to how you will
most likely do it in the 1st part of May.












Here is the data I used

Factual Philadelphia, MS Sawyer Skybolt
N32DS Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Low
Preliminary Elberta, AL Cessna 182A
N5099D Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Fuel parachute
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Harrisonville, MO Cessna 172K
N7448G Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
dual
Factual Cambridge, OH Krotje VM-1 Esqual
N626EA Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
mech experimental
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Phoenix, AZ Cessna 182K
N2493Q Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Preliminary Riverside, CA Cessna 195
N195AF Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Laurel, MT Piper PA-18-105
N5483H Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Low
Sunday, May 02, 2004
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Lake Dallas, TX Cessna 150J
N60539 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech/Skill
Monday, May 03, 2004
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Winder, GA Beech BE-65 (LF-23F)
N870KS Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill/Fuel
Preliminary Cary, NC Mooney M20M
N91514 Fatal(2) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Weather IFR
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Goldthwaite, TX Cessna 150E
N3050J Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Fuel
Tuesday, May 04, 2004
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Odessa, FL Cessna 172N
N737HW Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Wednesday, May 05, 2004
Preliminary Cumming, GA Gary Bergmann RANS
S-12XL N8KD Fatal(1) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Low experimental
Probable Cause 6/30/2004 Schaumburg, IL Cessna 172P
N65752 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation

Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Falcon, CO Ercoupe (Eng & Research
Corp.) N94405 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Turbulance
Thursday, May 06, 2004
Factual Kasilof, AK Piper PA-18
N2521S Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Off airport
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Blounts Creek, NC Riggs Skyraider 1
N321TR Fatal(1) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Fuel/Contamination experimental
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Fort Pierce, FL Beech H35
N87AD Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Pottstown, PA Cessna 152
N94577 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Dual
Friday, May 07, 2004
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Paragonah, UT Branham Vans RV-6
N29KB Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Fuel experimental
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Natrona, WY Crimmins Smyth
Sidewinder N92AC Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
fuel/contamination experimental
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Many, LA Piper PA-28-181
N21131 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Preliminary Tipton, CA Rocket Flyers LLC
N724TL Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech experimental
Factual Sharon, MA Cessna T-50
N45P Fatal(1) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Off airport
Saturday, May 08, 2004
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Mayetta, KS Villeneuve RV-3
N12JV Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill/Wind experimental
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 DeKalb, IL Piper PA-28RT-201
N81898 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
dual
Probable Cause 10/28/2004 Englewood, CO Cessna A185E
N185K Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Fuel
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Fort Stockton, TX Aeronca 7AC
N3708E Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech/Skill
Factual Cumberland, MD Taylorcraft BC
N26644 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Turbulance
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Crystal River, FL Beech A23A
N3659Q Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech/Skill
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Shirley, NY Cessna 170B
N1754D Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Sunday, May 09, 2004
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Hartford, WI Piper PA-12
N2368M Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Georgetown, TX Diamond Aircraft
Industries DA N89SE Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Midair
Probable Cause 9/29/2004 Georgetown, TX Giles 202
N202XS Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Midair
Factual Broadview, MT 2003 Nash Kitfox II
N308KF Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech expermental
Monday, May 10, 2004
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Oil City, LA Piper PA-38-112
N24007 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech/Skill
Factual Daytona Beach, FL Beech A36
N3670S Incident Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Battle Ground, WA Cessna 172P
N54477 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Dual/Wind
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
Preliminary Chamblee, GA Cessna 172RG
N6562V Incident Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Preliminary Cortland, AL Piper PA-28-140
N7123R Fatal(1) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Skill
Wednesday, May 12, 2004
Preliminary Lake Worth, FL Beech K35
N551PK Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Halifax, MA Aviat A-1B
N17MR Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Thursday, May 13, 2004
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Grantham, NC Loehle Ent. 2/3
Earlybird Jenn N112PE Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech Experimental
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Tucson, AZ Piper PA-28-161
N84245 Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Other
Preliminary Carson City, NV Piper PA-28-180
N7584W Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Wauseon, OH Fraker Mustang II
N78K Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech Experimental
Factual Shelton, WA Piper PA-22-20
N1829P Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Friday, May 14, 2004
Preliminary New Bern, NC Piper PA-32-260
N3260W Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Mech
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Kingman, AZ Cessna 180
N6430X Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Dual/Skill
Factual Lancaster, CA Downer Bellanca 14-19-2
N7658B Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Fuel/Skill
Factual Paulden, AZ Cessna T182T
N5341G Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Probable Cause 9/1/2004 Sacramento, KY Cessna 150
N7795E Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill/wind
Saturday, May 15, 2004
Probable Cause 7/29/2004 Fort Leavenwort, KS Cessna 172C
N1806Y Nonfatal Part 91: General Aviation
Skill
Preliminary Supai, AZ Bachman Lancair IV P
N299SD Fatal(4) Part 91: General Aviation
Fatal Unknown
  #4  
Old December 1st 04, 10:56 PM
Chris Ehlbeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A plane crash is news. A car crash normally isn't.
--
Chris Ehlbeck, PP-ASEL
"It's a license to learn, have fun and buy really expensive hamburgers."

"June" wrote in message
om...
I need some information from people 'in the field'. My husband has
his private license and is just starting to work on his IFR for
recreational flying. He wants to buy into a plane partnership, saying
he will be saving money rather than renting.

We have 2 little girls. I worry for his safety as it seems there is
another small plane crash every other time you turn on the news. I
think he should focus on this hobby when the kids are older, not when
he has such a young family.

Your opinions would be appreciated.



  #5  
Old December 6th 04, 02:05 PM
skycaptain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are (statistically speaking) more likely to get stuck by lightning,
and win the lottery than get injured in a small plane crash. The only
reason you hear about plane crashes on the news is that they happen so
rarely that each time it is considered newsworthy. Imagine if there
were a front page news report everytime there was an auto crash...

June wrote:
I need some information from people 'in the field'. My husband has
his private license and is just starting to work on his IFR for
recreational flying. He wants to buy into a plane partnership, saying
he will be saving money rather than renting.

We have 2 little girls. I worry for his safety as it seems there is
another small plane crash every other time you turn on the news. I
think he should focus on this hobby when the kids are older, not when
he has such a young family.

Your opinions would be appreciated.


  #6  
Old December 6th 04, 02:48 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"skycaptain" wrote in message
oups.com...
You are (statistically speaking) more likely to get stuck by lightning,
and win the lottery than get injured in a small plane crash. The only
reason you hear about plane crashes on the news is that they happen so
rarely that each time it is considered newsworthy. Imagine if there
were a front page news report everytime there was an auto crash...


References?





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 08:35 PM
Baghdad airport safe to fly ?? Nemo l'ancien Military Aviation 17 April 10th 04 12:58 AM
An Algorithm for Defeating CAPS, or how the TSA will make us less safe Aviv Hod Piloting 0 January 14th 04 02:55 PM
Fast Safe Plane Charles Talleyrand Piloting 6 December 30th 03 11:23 PM
Four Nimitz Aviators Safe after Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 July 28th 03 11:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.