Presidential TFR @ Kill Devil Hills

"R. Hubbell" wrote in message
news:kv3Eb.28631$pY.15075@fed1read04...

That's a good skill to have when using usenet, now if you practiced
what you preached maybe you would have a something salient to add to
the discussion.


If you review the thread you'll see that I have added to the discussion.



Or are you more interested in name calling?


Why do you ask that? Do you believe I engaged in name calling? If so,
please provide a quote of it.

"Montblack" wrote in message
.. .

"Smart" is mustering available resources effectively - gett'n the job
done,
plays well with others, etc. Intellect is one of those resources.


Based on that, Bush is smarter than Clinton.

"Montblack" wrote in message
...

I'm basing, maybe, 75% of my (most/lease intelligent) observations on
verbal
cues. I don't think Bush is a quick thinker. I don't see him as clever. I
see the guy struggle with word choices, comprehension (and also with his
delivery) at press conferences and in interviews.

Keeping with interviews ...I don't get the feeling I'm seeing a deep
thinker
in Bush. Instead, it often appears he's doing more reacting and blocking
than thinking and communicating.

Clinton seemed to be more of a multi-leveled thinker in those situations.


So good speaker/lousy policy beats poor speaker/sound policy?

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:04:22 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote:

I got news for you. AOPA is not in charge of enforcing the laws. If the
police let the guy go, take it up with the police.

Read what I posted. I did not say they didn't enforce the law, I said
they should have taken the information down so that they could use it in
the future, i.e. when a new stupid law is proposed they can guide it's
direction by virtue of having proof of what doesn't work.

Must you be contrary with everybody, can't you just read something as it's
posted?

For you I'll say it again, AOPA SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THE INFORMATION GIVEN
FOR THE RECORD, IN THE FUTURE THEY CAN THEN USE IT TO GUIDE THE CREATION
OF SOMETHING THAT WORKS.

They refused to listen.

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:43:52 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote:

So how many hours does Dubya have as PIC?
That's what we're talking about.

No, that's what you seem to think military pilots talk about. They don't,
can't you understand that. I know several myself, NOT ONE of them talk
about how many hours they have.

They talk about flying, just like most pilots do, but then I suppose you
measure your manhood by your PIC hours and assume everybody else does?

How old are you anyhow?

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:57:21 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"

So good speaker/lousy policy beats poor speaker/sound policy?


He didnt get the nickname "Slick Willy" for nothin'.

("Steven P. McNicoll" wrote)
"Smart" is mustering available resources effectively - gett'n the job
done, plays well with others, etc. Intellect is one of those resources.

Based on that, Bush is smarter than Clinton.


You're now into a review of the different administrations.

I'm smart enough to leave it at that :-)

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

("Steven P. McNicoll" wrote)
Clinton seemed to be more of a multi-leveled thinker in those
situations.

So good speaker/lousy policy beats poor speaker/sound policy?


Clinton has always appeared to me to have a bigger engine under the hood -
more available horsepower, etc, than Bush.

Who's the better driver?
Who's got the best pit crew?
Who's got the best sponsor deals? g
Who's car handles the best in the corners?
Who gets the best mileage?
Who is the fan favorite?

Horsepower is only one aspect of racing. But in that area, Clinton is
clearly the winner - if more is better.

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

"Montblack" wrote in message
...

Clinton has always appeared to me to have a bigger engine under the hood -
more available horsepower, etc, than Bush.

Who's the better driver?
Who's got the best pit crew?
Who's got the best sponsor deals? g
Who's car handles the best in the corners?
Who gets the best mileage?
Who is the fan favorite?

Horsepower is only one aspect of racing. But in that area, Clinton is
clearly the winner - if more is better.


So more horsepower/lousy policy beats less horsepower/sound policy?

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:16:36 -0600 "Matthew P. Cummings" wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:04:22 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote:

I got news for you. AOPA is not in charge of enforcing the laws. If the
police let the guy go, take it up with the police.

Read what I posted. I did not say they didn't enforce the law, I said

You've snipped it out. I don't have the time to search for it. If I remember
the context, it was a silly thing to expect from the AOPA. Enough said.


R. Hubbell

they should have taken the information down so that they could use it in
the future, i.e. when a new stupid law is proposed they can guide it's
direction by virtue of having proof of what doesn't work.

Must you be contrary with everybody, can't you just read something as it's
posted?

For you I'll say it again, AOPA SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THE INFORMATION GIVEN
FOR THE RECORD, IN THE FUTURE THEY CAN THEN USE IT TO GUIDE THE CREATION
OF SOMETHING THAT WORKS.

They refused to listen.