![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
I'm curious - what makes the term 'steward' or 'stewardess' offensive or wrong? I can't think of any negative connotations of the term which would do so. I couldn't agree more! The only difference I can see between "steward/stewardess" and "flight attendant" is that "stewardess" also denotes a female. But that's not offensive, it's factual, and there's no reason why that would have to be private info. What's so offensive or demeaning or wrong about "stewardess"? It's just an older word for someone performing the same duties. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith writes:
I'm curious - what makes the term 'steward' or 'stewardess' offensive or wrong? Wrong is a strong word. The most rational objection I've heard is that it's inaccurate because flight attendants are not actually steward(esse)s. A steward is a kind of personal assistant, or household domestic, or valet, or waiter, and so on. Flight attendants, however, are safety technicians; the usual tasks for which they are best known are in fact just busy work, because the only reason they are really there is to help in emergencies. Thus, "flight attendant" is more accurate. However, most flight attendants don't seem to get hyper if someone calls them a steward or stewardess. It just means that the passenger is behind the times, usually--way behind, these days, since FAs haven't been called stewards in quite a while. I can't think of any negative connotations of the term which would do so. There aren't any negative connotations, unless you think the traditional functions of a steward are Bad Things. The inaccuracy of the term favors something like flight attendant, but I don't know why anyone would be offended. As far as I know, at least where I live, the collective term is "cabin crew" and the singular term is "steward" or "stewardess", and this is what the cabin crew actually call themselves. Where do you live? I always thought "flight attendant" sounded slightly demeaning compared to "steward" or "cabin crew". It certainly could be taken that way, since it sounds somewhat like gas-station attendant, and tends to understate the importance of the job. But perhaps steward sounded too much like a personal slave? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith writes:
I'm curious - what makes the term 'steward' or 'stewardess' offensive or wrong? Mxsmanic wrote: Wrong is a strong word. The most rational objection I've heard is that it's inaccurate because flight attendants are not actually steward(esse)s. A steward is a kind of personal assistant, or household domestic, or valet, or waiter, and so on. The list of definitions (in the dictionary) goes on to include those responsible for the comfort of passengers on a ship or airplane. Flight attendants, however, are safety technicians; the usual tasks for which they are best known are in fact just busy work, because the only reason they are really there is to help in emergencies. Thus, "flight attendant" is more accurate. They were always there to not only do the "busy work" (serve food, drinks or bring blankets/pillows), but also to provide instruction and assistance in an emergency. I wouldn't say "flight attendant is more accurate" as much as it's just an updated title ... sort of the same way waiter/waitress has been replaced by "food server". Same job, updated title. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:27:59 -0500, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: WTH? My sister in law was a Japanese national (now US citizen) and I asked her about this one time. She seemed a little confused at the notion that "Oriental" was somehow offensive. Frankly, so am I. All it refers to is someone from the Orient. We call people from Europe Europeans and nobody's ass gets chapped. That one always confused me, as well. If I were Japanese, Thai, Tibetan, Korean, or Chinese, I think I'd want to be called Japanese, Thai, Tibetan, Korean, or Chinese. "Asian" is really no different than "Oriental" as it lumps them all together based on similar geographic origin. How does "Oriental" offend, but not "Asian"? It seems to me that if one offends, so should the other, or neither. I've never referred to the folks I know locally as Oriental or Asian, because I happen to know they are Thai, Tibetan, Korean, and Chinese. Here in New England, we have "Oriental Markets" and stores that sell "Oriental rugs" and "Oriental antiques". We also have Thai, Tibetan, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and even Korean restaurants. I never even heard the term "Asian" until I went to California for the first time. That's also the first time I saw an "Asian Restaurant". Apparently politically correct people on the west coast can't tell the difference between Chinese, Thai, and Tibetan food? G |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan (NZ) wrote:
"The next time you find yourself on a plane, sitting next to someone who cannot resist chattering to you endlessly, I have a very effective way of getting rid off people like that; they inevitably ask me about my disability, none of their business but in these occasions I am only too glad to oblige: oh that? airplane crash, no, no other survivor (entirely true, I was the only one on board, but I skip that part for the occasion); if I do it right, I can elaborate a little bit further, it shuts them up for the rest of the flight (except for some mumbling to themselves) --Sylvain |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't believe I'm saying this but what Mxsmanic said is correct.
Please, please, do hold what I just said against me. ;-) Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: G. Sylvester wrote: WTH? My sister in law was a Japanese national (now US citizen) and I asked her about this one time. She seemed a little confused at the notion that "Oriental" was somehow offensive. Frankly, so am I. All it refers to is someone from the Orient. We call people from Europe Europeans and nobody's ass gets chapped. in all honesty, beats the hell out of me why it is offensive. I learned this when I was 23 years old when I moved to southern california for gradual sic school. All I know is when I used the term I got looks like I had 5 heads. Maybe Kalifornians are a little, ummm, sensitive. smirk. I certainly did my best to soften them up. Ironically, I was talking to a friend in NY years later and he told me the same thing. Gerald Mxsmanic wrote: Dylan Smith writes: I'm curious - what makes the term 'steward' or 'stewardess' offensive or wrong? Wrong is a strong word. The most rational objection I've heard is that it's inaccurate because flight attendants are not actually steward(esse)s. A steward is a kind of personal assistant, or household domestic, or valet, or waiter, and so on. Flight attendants, however, are safety technicians; the usual tasks for which they are best known are in fact just busy work, because the only reason they are really there is to help in emergencies. Thus, "flight attendant" is more accurate. However, most flight attendants don't seem to get hyper if someone calls them a steward or stewardess. It just means that the passenger is behind the times, usually--way behind, these days, since FAs haven't been called stewards in quite a while. I can't think of any negative connotations of the term which would do so. There aren't any negative connotations, unless you think the traditional functions of a steward are Bad Things. The inaccuracy of the term favors something like flight attendant, but I don't know why anyone would be offended. As far as I know, at least where I live, the collective term is "cabin crew" and the singular term is "steward" or "stewardess", and this is what the cabin crew actually call themselves. Where do you live? I always thought "flight attendant" sounded slightly demeaning compared to "steward" or "cabin crew". It certainly could be taken that way, since it sounds somewhat like gas-station attendant, and tends to understate the importance of the job. But perhaps steward sounded too much like a personal slave? |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G. Sylvester wrote:
I can't believe I'm saying this but what Mxsmanic said is correct. Please, please, do hold what I just said against me. ;-) Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: G. Sylvester wrote: WTH? My sister in law was a Japanese national (now US citizen) and I asked her about this one time. She seemed a little confused at the notion that "Oriental" was somehow offensive. Frankly, so am I. All it refers to is someone from the Orient. We call people from Europe Europeans and nobody's ass gets chapped. in all honesty, beats the hell out of me why it is offensive. I learned this when I was 23 years old when I moved to southern california for gradual sic school. All I know is when I used the term I got looks like I had 5 heads. Maybe Kalifornians are a little, ummm, sensitive. smirk. I certainly did my best to soften them up. Ironically, I was talking to a friend in NY years later and he told me the same thing. Gerald It's all part of the California PC culture. If you say Asian you are saying where they or their family is FROM. If you say Oriental you are making a point of their race. I have a friend from school that was a South African national and has become a US Citizen since. He answers African-American when ever possible. He is VERY Caucasian, blond hair, blue eyes. |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_attendant BTW, also found these comments on flyertalk.... I've recently learnt that the words "steward/stewardess" are being replaced by "attendant" due to political correctness. Both are AmE or BrE according to my Cambridge Dict (Am and Br) Political correctness describes a word or expression that is used instead of another one to avoid being offensive Some people think that 'fireman' is a sexist term, and prefer the politically correct term 'firefighter'. I try to avoid the issue and say cabin crew for the group in general, as it's a political correctness issue. ok, I admit, I'm disgusted with myself for being PC. Jeez. If my friends find out about this, they'll be ridiculing me for years. The only reason I used FA vs. steward(ess) was because having flown 600k plus miles over the past 7 years was FA was the only term I ever heard used other than the vacation mongers who hang out with "low class" (vs. business/first class) folk. Now I only wonder if the UA RCC "Dragons" will take offense to that term. Ok, lets get off the passenger talk and back to the flying. I guess that leaves out mxmaniac. B A R R Y wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:27:59 -0500, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: If I were Japanese, Thai, Tibetan, Korean, or Chinese, I think I'd want to be called Japanese, Thai, Tibetan, Korean, or Chinese. "Asian" is really no different than "Oriental" as it lumps them all together based on similar geographic origin. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/oriental has an explanation. Back in NY it made no difference. Out in the Republik of Kalifornia, it makes a world of difference. I think I'm going to go back to the term Oriental. That's also the first time I saw an "Asian Restaurant". Apparently politically correct people on the west coast can't tell the difference between Chinese, Thai, and Tibetan food? G please, do not discriminate. We're all Americans...you know, one nation under gawd, all that grin Gerald |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:33:42 -0600, 601XL Builder
wrDOTgiacona@suddenlinkDOTnet wrote: It's all part of the California PC culture. If you say Asian you are saying where they or their family is FROM. If you say Oriental you are making a point of their race. _The ORIENT_ is a place, just like Asia! G There's even an airline named after the Orient as a place. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Portable DVD players for kids? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 17 | July 10th 06 07:56 PM |
8 days around the Great Lakes | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | June 28th 06 05:19 PM |
Plane for the kids | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 39 | January 26th 06 08:47 AM |
Took the Kids Up (First Time) | Marco Leon | Piloting | 39 | August 13th 05 05:28 AM |
List of Places to fly with kids? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 46 | July 10th 05 04:02 AM |