![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight rules. Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. That's one big reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the aircraft must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR operations, and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax 912ULS or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting them to day VFR. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June) |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote: On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote: The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight rules. Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above. That's one big reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the aircraft must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR operations, and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax 912ULS or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting them to day VFR. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Hix schreef:
In article , Jay Maynard wrote: On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote: The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight rules. Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above. This was about plane certification, not about pilot rating. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Hix" wrote in message
... In article , Jay Maynard wrote: On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote: The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight rules. Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above. That's one big reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the aircraft must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR operations, and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax 912ULS or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting them to day VFR. I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR. Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics. Peter |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
jan olieslagers wrote: Steve Hix schreef: In article , Jay Maynard wrote: On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote: The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight rules. Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above. This was about plane certification, not about pilot rating. Nevertheless, whether or not you can legally fly one at night or in IFR conditions is dependent on pilot rating as well as installed equipment. Things may be different on your side of the pond, but SLSA applies over here, and pilot certification affects legal use. |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Dohm wrote:
I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR. Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics. Peter The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR day or night. It all depends on your ticket. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-18, Steve Hix wrote:
In article , Jay Maynard wrote: Not true. [LSAs] can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above. True, and, for that matter, as long as you're not operating under the sport pilot rules with just your driver's license as medical. I was referring strictly to the aircraft. As always, there are a lot more rules that apply to any given operation than just those. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
... Peter Dohm wrote: I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR. Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics. Peter The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR day or night. It all depends on your ticket. I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed. Peter |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Dohm wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message ... Peter Dohm wrote: I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR. Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics. Peter The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR day or night. It all depends on your ticket. I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed. Peter But I don't think that particular Sensenich propeller is certified. |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-18, Peter Dohm wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message ... The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR day or night. It all depends on your ticket. I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed. The certificated version of the O-200, and a certificated Sensenich composite prop, and TSO'd instruments and avionics. There are only two LSAs (well, the other one's actually a family of closely related aircraft) that meet those requirements, the other one being the Tecnam Bravo/Sierra. There's at least one LSA manufacturer that claims LSAs can't be legally flown IFR, but I strongly suspect that's because they don't offer one. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flew home and boy are my arms tired! | Steve Schneider | Owning | 11 | September 5th 07 12:16 AM |
ASW-19 Moment Arms | jcarlyle | Soaring | 9 | January 30th 06 10:52 PM |
[!] Russian Arms software sale | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 18th 04 05:51 PM | |
Dick VanGrunsven commutes to aviation | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 2 | August 12th 04 11:19 PM |
Small arms locker questions | Red | Naval Aviation | 4 | July 30th 03 02:10 PM |