A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old March 18th 08, 04:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It greatly
simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard for
aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why
they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two
places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight
rules.


Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped. That's one big
reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the aircraft
must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR operations,
and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This
means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax 912ULS
or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting them
to day VFR.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June)
  #142  
Old March 18th 08, 05:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It
greatly
simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard
for
aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why
they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two
places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight
rules.


Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped.


As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above.

That's one big
reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the aircraft
must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR operations,
and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This
means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax 912ULS
or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting them
to day VFR.

  #143  
Old March 18th 08, 05:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
jan olieslagers[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

Steve Hix schreef:
In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It
greatly
simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard
for
aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why
they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two
places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight
rules.

Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped.


As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above.


This was about plane certification, not about pilot rating.
  #144  
Old March 18th 08, 02:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

"Steve Hix" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It
greatly
simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate
standard
for
aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is
why
they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as
two
places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight
rules.


Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped.


As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above.

That's one big
reason I wound up with a Zodiac XLi. The key is that no part of the
aircraft
must have manufacturer's instructions prohibiting night or IFR
operations,
and their equipment must meet the minimum standards of the rules. This
means, for example, that the aircraft must not be powered by a Rotax
912ULS
or Jabiru 3300, both of which have manufacturer's instructions limiting
them
to day VFR.


I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but
engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC)
are not supposed to be approved for night IFR.

Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics.

Peter



  #145  
Old March 18th 08, 03:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

In article ,
jan olieslagers wrote:

Steve Hix schreef:
In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-03-18, Highflyer wrote:
The FAA did precisely that with the S-LSA certification process. It
greatly
simplified the proof and oversight needed to ensure an adequate standard
for
aircraft that cannot endanger a lot of unsuspecting people. That is why
they limited them to slower airspeeds and lighter weights as well as two
places. They are also only allowed to fly Daytime and by Visual flight
rules.
Not true. They can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped.


As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above.


This was about plane certification, not about pilot rating.


Nevertheless, whether or not you can legally fly one at night or in IFR
conditions is dependent on pilot rating as well as installed equipment.

Things may be different on your side of the pond, but SLSA applies over
here, and pilot certification affects legal use.
  #146  
Old March 18th 08, 06:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Gig 601XL Builder[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

Peter Dohm wrote:

I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines; but
engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35 (IIRC)
are not supposed to be approved for night IFR.

Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics.

Peter




The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR
day or night. It all depends on your ticket.
  #147  
Old March 18th 08, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

On 2008-03-18, Steve Hix wrote:
In article ,
Jay Maynard wrote:
Not true. [LSAs] can fly IFR or night VFR if properly equipped.

As long as you have a Private Pilot rating, or above.


True, and, for that matter, as long as you're not operating under the sport
pilot rules with just your driver's license as medical.

I was referring strictly to the aircraft. As always, there are a lot more
rules that apply to any given operation than just those.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
  #148  
Old March 18th 08, 09:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...
Peter Dohm wrote:

I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines;
but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35
(IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR.

Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics.

Peter




The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR
day or night. It all depends on your ticket.


I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental
O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed.

Peter


  #149  
Old March 18th 08, 09:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Gig 601XL Builder[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

Peter Dohm wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...
Peter Dohm wrote:

I am not sure of the phrasing on that last part, regarding the engines;
but engine and propeller combinations not certified under parts 34 and 35
(IIRC) are not supposed to be approved for night IFR.

Several contributors here are much more knowledgeable of the specifics.

Peter



The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR
day or night. It all depends on your ticket.


I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental
O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed.

Peter




But I don't think that particular Sensenich propeller is certified.
  #150  
Old March 18th 08, 09:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven

On 2008-03-18, Peter Dohm wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...
The SLSA version of the 601XL built by AMD can be flown both IFR and VFR
day or night. It all depends on your ticket.

I took a look on their web site, and saw that they are using the Continental
O-200, which appears to be consistant with what I supposed.


The certificated version of the O-200, and a certificated Sensenich
composite prop, and TSO'd instruments and avionics. There are only two LSAs
(well, the other one's actually a family of closely related aircraft) that
meet those requirements, the other one being the Tecnam Bravo/Sierra.
There's at least one LSA manufacturer that claims LSAs can't be legally
flown IFR, but I strongly suspect that's because they don't offer one.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flew home and boy are my arms tired! Steve Schneider Owning 11 September 5th 07 12:16 AM
ASW-19 Moment Arms jcarlyle Soaring 9 January 30th 06 10:52 PM
[!] Russian Arms software sale Naval Aviation 0 December 18th 04 05:51 PM
Dick VanGrunsven commutes to aviation Fitzair4 Home Built 2 August 12th 04 11:19 PM
Small arms locker questions Red Naval Aviation 4 July 30th 03 02:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.