FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ

Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related interchanges
that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.


Juan and Jim are getting exactly what they want, they get off on seeing
their names written about over and over again. Same old stuff rehashed
over and over again. I realize Chuck has a BIG BEEF with Zoom and some
of the others of you have have been sued and threatened by him but come
on people get over it. It is a known fact that zoom and juan are losers
they are yesterdays news. Through this newsgroup they keep getting the
attention that they so desperately crave and this newsgroup keeps right
on giving it to them. I hardly ever see some of the old timers that use
to post here post anymore because of this type of wasted bandwidth.
I know I well get the usual "You are contributing to it also by responding"


Jerry

Kinda funny actually.... I lived in New Jersey during the time period
mentioned. Couldn't remember a show in Lakehurst. Thought maybe it was my
Air Force bias, so I did a search. And searched. And searched some more.
I cannot find a single historical reference to an airshow at Lakehurst in
1981. Found several references for the Memorial Day airshow at McGuire AFB,
which is what I thought I remembered. Not far apart geographically, but
worlds apart for a pilot. For the record, the Mcguire airshow is one of the
largest in the east each year. I sincerely doubt, given factors such as
parking, crowd & traffic control and airspace control, that two military
installations so close to each other would have competing airshows. Makes
this whole insane asylum even more interesting and mysterious.

"Harry K" wrote in message
ups.com...

Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Al G" wrote in message
...

Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the
source?


He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
verify
any accomplishment.

http://www.aero-news.net/Community/D...1905&Refresh=1

The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.

Are you sure you got that email from Jim?

Juan



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Supposing (and that is a looonnng 'suppose') that the barograph
actually existed. What part of a barograph that wasn't sealed and
certified by a disinterestped party did you not understand? Claiming
that "I made a record and here is the barograph" Is just about as
credible as "I made a record and (points) there is the cloud I flew
above in that (points) plane"
That is, exactly no credibility at all.

Harry K

Jerry Springer wrote:

Juan and Jim are getting exactly what they want, they get off on seeing
their names written about over and over again. snipped

Jerry

It's a good point, but remember, these threads are separated into
different topics allowing folks to avoid threads involving Captain Zoom
by mere mention of his name in the headlines.

There's also an old saying that applies to both and it's critical: "Be
careful what you wish ~ you might get it."

The "joy" with which they embrace their evil ~ as reflected in their
writings and postings ~ will come back to haunt them at a later date,
especially considering Campbell's thirty-year history of misconduct and
criminal misconduct, including stalking and domestic terrorism.

I think Juan's the only one getting off right now. Campbell is laying
might low and watching his P's & Q's very carefully. All that's needed
is one honest Federal Judge, and he goes to prison for life on charges
of Federal Perjury alone. The thirty years of Criminal misconduct
seals his fate on those recent charges alone. "Habitual Criminal"
becomes an issue, and like I said, he's being aided and abetted...so
those are the ones that matter at this point in time, three decades
later, especially where the FAA and NTSB are involved, know his
history, and have done nothing about him though now benefitting from
good publicity given to them by him.

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
.. .

"Al G" wrote in message
...

Go ask Mr. Campbell, Mike. Why come to me when you can go to the source?


He made no mention of any barograph or other recoding instrument to
verify any accomplishment.

http://www.aero-news.net/Community/D...1905&Refresh=1

The barograph is mentioned right there next to the altitude, Al.



Didn't see it in the email.


Are you sure you got that email from Jim?



I can't tell you or I'd have to kill you. You have seen some of his email
haven't you? Apparently I should be seeking legal council right now.


I've got no big thing for zoom, generally he is harmless to the well
informed.

I have not said anywhere that his flight didn't occur.

I have said that he is claiming a title he has not earned, and that I, as
one who has earned the title, object.

All I ask is that he remove reference to "World Record", and replace it with
something more appropriate, say "Personal Best".

If an advisory board member of an aviation organization claimed to be a
pilot and wasn't, would you correct him?

That too is easily verifiable, and there is but one recognized authority.
You wouldn't accept someone's unofficial license, would you?


Al G

The issue of a record is fairly easily dispensed with if not silenced.
Without the benefit of independant documentation the attempt or feat simply
never occurred. There are many persons today with the opinion that Jacob
Brodbeck or Gustav Whitehead achieved the world's first powered flight years
before the Wright brothers. The claims are not silenced by the fact that
only the Wrights had their attempt (and success) documented properly. The
others are simply pretenders, they may not be liars, but they hold no record
and all the claims in the world will not change recorded fact.

The same principal may well apply in the case your ZZZ fellow. He makes an
unrecognized claim, there appears to be no record of fact to back the claim
and in official terms that means it never happened, he is (or was) also a
self admitted liar. But that is unlikely to stifle the claim, especially
from someone so clearly enamoured of himself.

Al G wrote:
I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats, get
a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.

Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg

Wear it proudly.

John Ousterhout
- rah-14

"John Ousterhout" wrote in message
news:fbhhh.274084$FQ1.4251@attbi_s71...
Al G wrote:
I got an email from Zoom yesterday. Beyond the usual stuff: threats,
get a lawyer, besmirched his rep, I made false claims, etc.

Congratulations, you've won a T-Shirt.
http://ousterhout.net/gallery/I've_been_zoomed.jpg

Wear it proudly.

John Ousterhout
- rah-14

No **** John? Damn, I'm, well, Honored. I'd like to thank my parents, and
teachers, and all the little people that made my rise to ultimate success a
reality.

By the way, I got another nasty gram. What is "Tortuous Interference"
anyway? I wish Tony was here...

Al G

"DABEAR" wrote in message
oups.com...

Juan Jimenez wrote:

That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us.

A double-edged sword that's going to take down your boss and you.

Is that a promise? How precious. chuckle

BTW, you're doing a great job of proving how much of an ignorant slut you
truly are. Jim's not my boss.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Dan" wrote in message
...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
DABEAR wrote:
john smith wrote:
I screwed that story up, didn't I?

Nooooooo. Happens to the best of us.

Besides, if you want to read some really screwed up stories, try...

...wait for it...




Aero-News.Scam!

Or yawn's "reporting" on what really happened at S'n'F.

That's the beauty of it, I didn't have to report anything that day, the
print and TV media in the Lakeland area did that for us.
And they reported the opposite of what campbell and you tell us.

I know you have trouble reading. It's ok for you to admit it.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Jerry Springer" wrote in message
news:5Tehh.402$HT5.139@trnddc02...
Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote:
I think all of you should write Campbell a thank you note for all of the
entertainment he has provided even if it is indirectly. As a
rec.aviation.homebuilt NG this sounds more like grade school bashing
practice. I wish there could be interesting aviation related
interchanges
that focussed on a technical issue that attracted this much attention.


Juan and Jim are getting exactly what they want, they get off on seeing
their names written about over and over again.

Nice try, but not even close. Jim doesn't read usenet. And all I get a kick
out of is yanking the chains and watching the rah monkeys jump up and down.


You see, kiddo, if what I wanted was attention, why do I only respond to
posts, rather than creating the threads? Keep your day job, you're not a
shrink either. Better direct your therapy efforts at the Chuck Steak, he's
the one who keeps posting on and on and on about Jim. Seems like Jim really
did do a good job on him.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com