![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Gaquin" wrote:
"john smith" wrote in message news:jsmith- The diagram has not been updated to show the newly added 600 foot extension and connecting taxiway. Quite the opposite, I think. James is correct. FAA diagram he http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0608/00697AD.PDF Current aerial shot showing the new extension and taxiway is he http://www.wcpo.com/specials/2006/5191/ Scroll through "The photos" Ron Lee |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Robinson wrote:
Some guy wrote: Isn't checking the heading indicator to to make sure you're on the right runway was a standard checkoff list type of a thing? Have you never been on a commercial aircraft where the engines are spooling up as the aircraft turns onto the runway? Do you really think they have cross-checked with the compass at that point? The heading indicator responds faster than the compass (and if it's not already slaved, one would hope it was set before they even thought about taking the runway). |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
In article , (Ron Lee) wrote: James is correct. FAA diagram he http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0608/00697AD.PDF This diagram does not show the extension. Look at Google Earth and the angle that the taxiway makes with the runway 22 approach end. The 90-degree intersection is south of the threshhold. John, James wrote "The diagram doesn't show the additional taxiway that is apparent in the photographs." My post confirmed his statement. Please look at the info that has been provided. Ron Lee |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... In article , (Ron Lee) wrote: James is correct. FAA diagram he http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0608/00697AD.PDF This diagram does not show the extension. Look at Google Earth and the angle that the taxiway makes with the runway 22 approach end. The 90-degree intersection is south of the threshhold. Google Earth photos of KLEX date from 2003... Jay B |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
In article , James Robinson wrote: (Ron Lee) wrote: "Aluckyguess" wrote: Looking at that diagram I see how easy it would of been to do what they did. WOW Here's a diagram dated 08/03/2006: Don't agree with you Barry. They should have seen that you taxi rightish from the terminal past Rwy 26 then either one (apparently from pics) of two taxiways to Rwy 22. Even I can do that. The diagram doesn't show the additional taxiway that is apparent in the photographs News reports quote another pilot as saying that old right-hand taxiway had a recently-erected barrier across it. He said it was a complete surprise when he came across it the first time. The diagram has not been updated to show the newly added 600 foot extension and connecting taxiway. Here is a link to a diagram of the changes that were made: http://tinyurl.com/zybuf Here is a link to a photo of the old arrangement from Yahoo maps: http://tinyurl.com/qknmg As you can see, A-8 would take you to the end of runway 26, and A-7 would take you 500 feet from the end of the runway. Looking at the diagram in the above link, plus recent news pictures, the changes have not extended the runway at the north end, but have in fact diplaced the threshold by 400 feet or so. With the displaced threshold, the old taxiway A-8 has been closed, and therefore doesn't show on the diagram referenced in the earlier post. These aren't super clear, but you can see how the runway has been repainted to reflect the displaced threshold: http://www.wcpo.com/news/2006/local/...lane/ntsb2.jpg http://tinyurl.com/h99og |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks James. Your diagram makes it clear, but the photos show that A-8
still exists. Is it blocked off with barracades as other posters have noted? |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
Thanks James. Your diagram makes it clear, but the photos show that A-8 still exists. Is it blocked off with barracades as other posters have noted? I don't know from personal experience, but the news reports on the day of the accident included the following quote: " The construction changes momentarily confused veteran pilot Lowell Wiley two days before the Comair crash. He nosed his plane down the same taxiway that he had taken for years until hitting a barricade. "It was a total surprise," said Wiley, who adjusted course and got onto the correct runway. He now understands why the Comair pilot might have headed down a runway 1,500 feet (450 meters) too short to make a proper takeoff. " |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Robinson wrote:
john smith wrote: Thanks James. Your diagram makes it clear, but the photos show that A-8 still exists. Is it blocked off with barracades as other posters have noted? I don't know from personal experience, but the news reports on the day of the accident included the following quote: " The construction changes momentarily confused veteran pilot Lowell Wiley two days before the Comair crash. He nosed his plane down the same taxiway that he had taken for years until hitting a barricade. "It was a total surprise," said Wiley, who adjusted course and got onto the correct runway. He now understands why the Comair pilot might have headed down a runway 1,500 feet (450 meters) too short to make a proper takeoff. " That comment does not make sense. To get to Rwy 22 you must cross Rwy 26 totally. Whether you take Taxiway A7 or A8 seems irrelevant. If you are stopped after crossing Rwy 26 by a barricade on A8, why would you think, "OK, let's forget Rwy 26 and just use this one"? Ron Lee |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom2000 wrote
Can any transport pilots expound on your takeoff procedures? Is it SOP to do something explict when you're checking your takeoff heading? This Expanded Checklist from my 'old' 1970s PanAm B-707 Operations Manual. This configuration check is the final portion of the takeoff checklist and challenged when lined-up on the runway. TAKEOFF Configuration Check The First Officer passes the checklist to the flight engineer at this point.The flight engineer will announce "Configuration Check" and will challenge the pilots on items that follow. The Captain will respond to all items and additionally the first officer will respond to the stabilizer trim and compass items. Antiskid.......ON The captain will check that the ANTI-SKID switch is ON, guard down. The flight engineer will visually check that no releases are showing in the antiskid BRAKES window. Speedbrake..FORWARD Check that the speedbrake is in the foreward zero detent. Stabilizer Trim.... Both pilots will declare stabilizer settings and cross check. Wing Flaps......... Declare handle setting and gage indications, and ( ),INDICATE ( ), check both LE FLAP lights green. GREEN LIGHTS Compasses...CHECKED Both pilots will cross check compasses against takeoff-runway heading. TAKEOFF CHECKLIST IS The flight engineer verifies that all Takeoff COMPLETE checklist items have been completed. Bob Moore ATP B-707 B-727 L-188 PanAm (retired) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Doubts raised in jet crash | Dave Butler | Piloting | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |