![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bert Hyman" wrote in message ... In nobody wrote: Your handgun serves only one purpose: to kill or seriously injur a human. Really? Do tell. He has done so. |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Marie Lewis" wrote: Indeed I do: when we first went to the USA, many years ago, we loved it and even thought about emigrating. The second time, we began to see the drawbacks. Now nothing would encourage us to spend more than a short holiday there, and that only when you stop being so up yourselves. So the offer by our LA relatives to have us live with them in the winters is happily rejected. So you're basing your views on the US on... LA? Now, *that* is funny. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Marie Lewis" wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote in message om... In article , Peter Kemp wrote: So how do you explain Heathrow, one of the busiest airports in the wolrd (in the top 5 IIRC), and which has significantly shorter lines than any US airport I've eneterd the US at (7 so far and counting)? Many more bureaucrats working the incoming lines. Pretty simple, really. And a simple way to make travel easier and more pleasant. Except that there's no particular reason to double or triple the expenses like that, since the wait really isn't that long for most people. Sheesh, you probably wait that long in most *banks*. You really are funny. I bet you have never left the USA. Except that you're wrong. Not that I want you to: much better for us that you stay there. ....and *please*, don't ever come back here. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 02:17:41 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , Peter Kemp wrote: On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 21:47:07 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: In article , Peter Kemp wrote: Oh, and defending your home is not illegal, the emphasis in the UK is defending your *life*, and to use reasonable force (where reasonable force does *not*include waiting for burglars with an illegally held shorgun, then shooting one of them in the back). ...in the dark, in the wee hours of the morning, in a remote area, when the police wouldn't do much of anything... Which is a policing problem, not a legal one. So your claim is that people can't police their own homes, but the police don't have to, either? No wonder the crime rate's going up so fast over there. Nice of you folks to protect violent burglars like that (look at the wonderful followups of what the "victimized" burglar has done since). Which one - the one without *any* violent convictions who is mouldering in his grave after being murdered? "Murdered" suggests some sort of innocence. If he didn't want to risk his life, he shouldn't have committed the crime. Ranks right up there with idiots who get killed doing other stupid things, like walking on railroad tracks. I can't believe you're defending a criminal who died while committing a potentially-violent crime. Or the other one (and I can't recall any violent convicitons for him either) whose is admittedly a miserable git? Well, aside from being a drug dealer who *did* have a bad history, there's no particular reason to want that sort of asshole running around. Or do you really think these two saints would have left the old guy alone if he *hadn't* been armed? Exactly. If you enter my home without my permission or other legal authorization (Police, Fire Dept) you WILL be shot. And I am not stupid enough to "shoot to wound". You will get a "double tap" at your center of mass, and I will "repeat as necessary". Al Minyard |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jboy wrote:
Last month it took me 3 hours to get from the plane to cab in Atlanta airport and that was before all this photo and fingerprint stuff started. Just wait until they make you undress down do your underpants so they can take a "better" picture of your birthmarks, scars etc. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Truly free countries realize that police cannot be everywhere,and protect
everyone.They allow citizens the means to defend themselves and their homes. Why are you so concerned about criminals shot while committing a crime,and not for the poor guy who suffered repeated burglaries? What does "violent convictions" have to do with it? Shooting the crims was a public service. Well I think that Government should take more active role in this to make the country more secure so there is no need to arm everyone just in case. |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jboy" wrote in
: God you guys are so stuck up your arse it hurts. Don't you realise that we are your allies and we are sick an tired of being treated like the enemy? Being made to stand for hours on end, because you cant get people to man immigration desks or do security properly is now starting to make most of us determined to avoid your paranoid country. Last month it took me 3 hours to get from the plane to cab in Atlanta airport and that was before all this photo and fingerprint stuff started. Maybe that's because the enemies of America are travelling through YOUR countries in order to sneak into the US to commit terrorism here. They are not flying direct from whereever they originate.Sometimes,their cells reside in your countries,in order to take advantage of Western resources not available in their original countries. How will you like it when you arrive at Heathrow and we insist that you stand in line for hours on end. Yep I'll be listening to moaning Wilmers complaining that they are being treated as terrorists. Funny how that's OK, but when we complain we are raving Pink Commies.. Well,no terrorists are travelling through the US to get to your country. -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote in
om: Actually, while a lot of people try to claim that, very few trains are that efficient. Most UK trains, for example, are *more* polluting, when you take electrical generation and coal use into account. I wonder how -they- handle the fly ash problem from burning coal? -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
nobody writes: jboy wrote: Last month it took me 3 hours to get from the plane to cab in Atlanta airport and that was before all this photo and fingerprint stuff started. Just wait until they make you undress down do your underpants so they can take a "better" picture of your birthmarks, scars etc. Noo need for that - Birthmarks, scars, etc. can be faked/altered well enough with makeup or tatooing & such that it's really rather pointless. It's much better to go with stuff like your skull shape. That, it turns out, can be measured directly from optical photographs of the head & face, and fairly easily can be reduced to a form that allows automatic comparisons. With, it ought to be pointed out, a lower failure rate than fingerprint comparisons. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | November 30th 03 05:57 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |