KCHD to KMYF

Mxsmanic wrote:

A flight plan need not be complete to be legal. Indeed, you don't have to file
anything at all for VFR in the U.S (usually). And how much planning you do is
up to you, as long as you don't seem negligent in the event of an accident.

Filing a flight plan is just a small part of flight planning, and no, how
much planning you do is not up to the pilot.

But again, your babbling nonsense just proves once again you have no clue
what the term "flight planning" and "flight planner" mean.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

That would be impossible as you have already said you don't use a flight
planner and you don't have to scale printed charts.

Neither is necessary for safe planning.

One or the other is required to do flight planning.

Yet again you show you haven't a clue what the term "flight planning" means.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Gibbering nonsense that just shows again you haven't a clue about how to
do real flight planning.

If you use a map in crayon provided to you by a friend, you're not using a
certified source. If something happens on the flight, your failure to use a
certified source could be held against you by the FAA.

Yet more gibberning nonsense.

You've raved on and on time and again about how "safe" you are; "safer"
than real pilots who really do flight planning.

Safer than _some_ pilots who really do flight planning.

If the objective is to really simulate flying, then you need to do the
same flight planning you would do for real flight.

That depends on the part of flying that I wish to simulate. I simulate
planning to the extent that it affects safety, usually, but I don't try to
simulate any additional overhead that wouldn't be germane to that objective.

Indeed, one of the great advantages of simulation is not having to bother with
useless paperwork.

Yet more gibberish that shows once again you have no clue what the term
"flight planning" means or why it is done.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

The choices are not just airways or direct to.

True, but airways are very frequently used.

Partly true, but not for the reasons you think and irrelevant to the discussion.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 7, 9:05*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
VOR-DME writes:
I'm sorry to hear it if there's a health issue involved in not flying, and I'm
sincere in that.

I'm not too happy about it, either. I haven't actually applied for a medical,
but I'm not optimistic. As long as the FAA continues to treat pilots like
astronauts, medicals will be a problem.

AGAIN, you have no clue what you are talking about.

Uhhh sports pilot category. You only making an excuse not to fly a
real plane.

And if you are not in the country FAA IS NOT YOUR PROBLEM.

writes:

Uhhh sports pilot category.

I don't want to be a sport pilot. Too many restrictions to make it worthwhile.

And if you are not in the country FAA IS NOT YOUR PROBLEM.

I'm not interested in flying outside of the U.S., and other countries are
often just as bad or worse with their regulations as is the FAA. In fact, the
FAA is fairly liberal among developed countries, in many ways.

I hate to do it, because I think you have something to contribute to the
reading of this group, but I just cant deal with your constant quips with
MX. I am going to block you.

Start posting under a new screen name when you decide to grow up.
--
Jim in NC

On May 8, 8:15*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
Uhhh sports pilot category.

I don't want to be a sport pilot. Too many restrictions to make it worthwhile.

There are former fighter pilots who are satisfied with LS.
138 mph will get you there faster than you think, and do
you really think you'd need to go higher than 10,000 ft?

http://www.flylightning.net/

---
Mark

On May 8, 8:47*am, "Morgans" wrote:
I hate to do it, because I think you have something to contribute to the
reading of this group, but I just cant deal with your constant quips with
MX. *I am going to block you.

Start posting under a new screen name when you decide to grow up.
--
Jim in NC

Well I hope you would never consider blocking
me and Ari. It's a safety issue.

---
Mark

Morgans writes:

I hate to do it, because I think you have something to contribute to the
reading of this group, but I just cant deal with your constant quips with
MX. I am going to block you.

Promises, promises. We'll see how long you can resist not seeing my posts.