A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Any fliers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old June 1st 04, 05:56 PM
Billy Beck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote:

BUFDRVR wrote:

Absolutely. When I heard the sortie durations for the F-15E guys/gals for OEF
I instantly felt better about my 17+ hour sorties. You would have to pry me
out of the seat with a crow bar after 12 hours in a fighter.


The properly selected seconds in a PA-32R left me with a lip lock on the seat
that it took the Jaws of Life to defeat.



Try to imagine 64 days, 22 hours, 19 minutes and five seconds in
a Cessna 172.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_ho.../10588716.html

They had the advantage (I guess) of the refuelings in which to
stretch a muscle here & there.


Billy

http://www.two--four.net/weblog.php
  #184  
Old June 5th 04, 03:09 AM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

stevem8597 wrote:

You guys are weenies. Try flying formation with other fighters and a tanker
for 8 hours in and out of the weather overwater in a half inch thick anti
exposure suit.


I guess its all a matter of perspective. 30+ hours airborne is paiful, and us
bombers guys have *plenty* of night,weather air refueling. I'd imagine nearly
continuous A/Rs are a pain in the ass, but taking on 120,000 pounds at night in
the weather over the Pacific is no picnic. If the tanker can run on all its
boost pumps we can take about 6,000 pounds a minute which means 20 minutes of
contact time to take on the required on load. In my opinion, both seem
challenging.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #185  
Old June 5th 04, 03:35 AM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess its all a matter of perspective. 30+ hours airborne is paiful, and us
bombers guys have *plenty* of night,weather air refueling. I'd imagine nearly
continuous A/Rs are a pain in the ass, but taking on 120,000 pounds at night
in
the weather over the Pacific is no picnic. If the tanker can run on all its
boost pumps we can take about 6,000 pounds a minute which means 20 minutes of
contact time to take on the required on load. In my opinion, both seem
challenging.


I was looking at my granddads records when he flew the D at Ellsworth, and once
he had 5 refuelings without a disconnect. Seeing as that is at least 20 min
each time, seems like not a bad achievement at all

Did you know who Tony Kern was from an earlier conversation on here?


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #186  
Old June 5th 04, 07:31 AM
Jim Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron" wrote in message
...
I guess its all a matter of perspective. 30+ hours airborne is paiful,

and us
bombers guys have *plenty* of night,weather air refueling. I'd imagine

nearly
continuous A/Rs are a pain in the ass, but taking on 120,000 pounds at

night
in
the weather over the Pacific is no picnic. If the tanker can run on all

its
boost pumps we can take about 6,000 pounds a minute which means 20

minutes of
contact time to take on the required on load. In my opinion, both seem
challenging.


I was looking at my granddads records when he flew the D at Ellsworth, and

once
he had 5 refuelings without a disconnect. Seeing as that is at least 20

min
each time, seems like not a bad achievement at all

Did you know who Tony Kern was from an earlier conversation on here?


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base


Tony Kern and I were instructor pilots in the Bone schoolhouse in 1991.
Last I talked to him, about 6 or so months ago, he was the head of aircraft
ops for the Forest Service. Probly why you know the name eh? :-)

JB


  #187  
Old June 5th 04, 08:35 AM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony Kern and I were instructor pilots in the Bone schoolhouse in 1991.
Last I talked to him, about 6 or so months ago, he was the head of aircraft
ops for the Forest Service. Probly why you know the name eh? :-)

JB


Yeah, wish I could talk about him or current events in a positive manner
though.


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #189  
Old June 5th 04, 01:26 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron wrote:

Did you know who Tony Kern was from an earlier conversation on here?


No. Who is he?


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Fliers Only ArtKramr Military Aviation 37 December 4th 03 09:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.