A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Manufacturing Quality



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 7th 06, 05:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Manufacturing Quality


"Jim Carter" wrote in message
news:001a01c6b9bb$e0756250$4001a8c0@omnibook6100.. .


-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Whiting ]
Posted At: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:26 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Manufacturing Quality
Subject: Manufacturing Quality

Jim Carter wrote:

I used to believe the same thing about GMC and Chevy, only cosmetic
differences. But now after owning two GMC Sierras I am beginning to
suspect some other differences. Even though the use hasn't changed,

the
GMCs require about 1/2 the maintenance as the Chevys did. Simple

things
like sticky throttles, intermittent switches, loose exhaust

brackets,
etc. don't seem to be plaguing our GMCs like they did the Chevy

variant.

My wife says they "sound" different too; "tighter and more
put-together".


Just shows you the games our mind can play one us. They are made in

the
same plant. http://www.autofieldguide.com/articles/070207.html

I believe they are actually made on the same production line, but the
same people, with just a few parts (grill, some interior parts, etc.)
being different, but I can't find any proof of that at the moment.

The
engines and components are identical so any difference you are seeing

is
a sample difference, not a Chevy vs. GMC difference.

Matt


Maybe as time goes on they are getting a little more careful and have
learned a few things. Could be the Chevys and GMCs are not completely
identical mechanically and operationally.



They come down the same assembly line. The ONLY difference is one gets a
Chevy badge the next a GMC badge.


  #12  
Old August 7th 06, 02:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Manufacturing Quality



Dave Stadt wrote:




They come down the same assembly line. The ONLY difference is one gets a
Chevy badge the next a GMC badge.


Sometimes both.
  #13  
Old August 7th 06, 04:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Manufacturing Quality


"john smith" wrote in message
news:jsmith-BBC896.22051306082006@network-065-024-007-
I built Firebird's and Camero's for six summers when I was in college.
For each vehicle, there was a sheet of paper that listed all the
details. At the start of each sub assembly, a copy of the sheet was
attached to the support frame. At each station, the worker would check
the list appropriate for the function he/she was performing and supply
the correct part to the assembly. There as an inspector and utility
man/woman at various points on the line to correct any incorrect
assemblies.


To add a data point here I was at a GMC dealership several years ago when a
friend was looking for a small SUV. We were looking at a GMC Jimmy and on
the left side of the truck that's what it said it was. On the right side it
said S-10 (Chevy's version of the same thing.)


  #14  
Old August 7th 06, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Manufacturing Quality

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"john smith" wrote in message
news:jsmith-BBC896.22051306082006@network-065-024-007-

I built Firebird's and Camero's for six summers when I was in college.
For each vehicle, there was a sheet of paper that listed all the
details. At the start of each sub assembly, a copy of the sheet was
attached to the support frame. At each station, the worker would check
the list appropriate for the function he/she was performing and supply
the correct part to the assembly. There as an inspector and utility
man/woman at various points on the line to correct any incorrect
assemblies.



To add a data point here I was at a GMC dealership several years ago when a
friend was looking for a small SUV. We were looking at a GMC Jimmy and on
the left side of the truck that's what it said it was. On the right side it
said S-10 (Chevy's version of the same thing.)


I guess the left side was the upscale and higher quality side then, eh? :-)

Matt
  #15  
Old August 8th 06, 12:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default Manufacturing Quality

In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
"john smith" wrote in message
news:jsmith-BBC896.22051306082006@network-065-024-007-

I built Firebird's and Camero's for six summers when I was in college.
For each vehicle, there was a sheet of paper that listed all the
details. At the start of each sub assembly, a copy of the sheet was
attached to the support frame. At each station, the worker would check
the list appropriate for the function he/she was performing and supply
the correct part to the assembly. There as an inspector and utility
man/woman at various points on the line to correct any incorrect
assemblies.



To add a data point here I was at a GMC dealership several years ago when a
friend was looking for a small SUV. We were looking at a GMC Jimmy and on
the left side of the truck that's what it said it was. On the right side it
said S-10 (Chevy's version of the same thing.)


I guess the left side was the upscale and higher quality side then, eh? :-)


Nope, just charge more for it.
GM used to use the same motor for electric windows across the product
lines. Which vehicle it went in determined how much it cost.
  #16  
Old August 8th 06, 06:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default Manufacturing Quality

("Newps" wrote)
Sometimes both.



I owned a 1984 Datsun/Nissan ...depended where on the car you were looking.


Montblack
  #17  
Old August 8th 06, 02:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Manufacturing Quality

Montblack wrote:
("Newps" wrote)
Sometimes both.



I owned a 1984 Datsun/Nissan ...depended where on the car you were looking.


I remember that! My wife had a 1984 300ZX with both names on it.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manufacturing Quality john smith Piloting 100 August 13th 06 01:22 PM
Poor Audio Quality, FlightCom 403 Stereo Intercom mikem Owning 5 April 17th 06 04:40 PM
quality control manuals QCMAN General Aviation 0 December 15th 04 02:23 AM
Sailplane Manufacturing Sites/Information - College Project Matt Soaring 2 February 13th 04 02:11 PM
During hot air balloon races in Reno/Sparks, avoid Quality Inn Joe Clark General Aviation 0 July 18th 03 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.