Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

TRUTH wrote:
Flying in clear
skies does not require an instrument rating.



At 30,000 feet it does

Why? What does altitude have to do with it?

Newps wrote:
Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating.

At 30,000 feet it does

Why? What does altitude have to do with it?


Airspace between 18,000 feet MSL and Flight Level 600 is designated Class A
airspace and all operations there must be conducted under IFR.

http://www.asy.faa.gov/safety_produc...spaceclass.htm




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE

TRUTH wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote in
:



TRUTH wrote:

"Matt Wright" wrote in
oups.com:

Another poster provided FAA records showing that Mohammed Atta was
both commercial and instrument rated - hardly a "clueless
non-pilot". Flight instructors maybe had poor overall opinions of
the pilots, but you don't know how long they trained away from the
flight school. You don't know how much "book time" they had
studying avionics. The attack had years of planning behind it. I
guess they could have spent that time playing pinball... but maybe
instead they were studying. That something is hard does not make it
impossible.

Matt.

I missed that. Please post it. Still, showing one of them was
instrument trained does not explain the others

How many times do you need to have it explained to you that there was
no need for any of them to be instrument trained ? Flying in clear
skies does not require an instrument rating.

Graham





At 30,000 feet it does

In a word
Bull****.
World record for altitude in a sailplane is somewhere about 50,000 ft
no instrument rating required.

So once again you are wrong a position not unusual to you..
Read the FAR's