If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jordan wrote:
dontcowerfromthetruth wrote: Keep in mind (when reading the following) that Syria has supposedly made some sort of defense pact with Iran. Syria and Iran have made an explicit, open defense pact. As they have both been threatened by both Israel and the US as was Iraq and they have seen the US slaughter in Iraq that is the least they should do. So is attacking Damascus the way the Zionists will expand the war for Israel to Syria and Iran next (in accordance with the 'A Clean Break' agenda that esteemed intelligence writer/author James Bamford discusses on pages 261-269/321 of his 'A Pretext for War' book - see the URL about such included after the following) as Bush and Cheney have already said that the US would come to Israel's aid if Israel is attacked which will most likely happen if Israel gets into it with Syria and Iran: Well damn, it would be _nice_ if this happened -- it would get the war with Syria and Iran out into the open and put a powerful ally on our side. Plus, Israel could smack around Syria, maybe bite off another chunk of their territory, keeping the Syrians occupied while we took out the Iranian regime. If, that is, we're ready for it. http://www.giwersworld.org/opinion/running.phtml 2006 June 26 Palestinians guilty again In the two weeks before Palestinians from Gaza destroyed an Israeli tank, killing two, injuring one, kidnapping a fourth, had murdered 18 civilians in Gaza including women, children and paramedics. But it is Palestinians who are guilty for fighting back. It is always the same. Zionists can do no wrong. But they kidnapped a member of the Israeli army!!! The day before Israeli troops entered Gaza and kidnapped two Palestinians who have since disappeared. The government press release said they were terrorists but they have not been charged. They have not been heard of since. Ever wonder who sold Bush on the idea of a prison in Guantanamo? The real screw up in this was the failure of IDF policy to kill their own rather than let them be taken prisoner. If Palestinians kill him it will be murder. Looks to me like they will be doing the IDF's job for them. Shocked? Yes the IDF does have this policy and it is well known in Israel. The reason is the voters get hysterical when it happens and demand the government make all the concessions demanded. When it happens near elections the government has been forced to do just that. The policy to kill their own is to avoid having to make concessions to the occupied people. And the world goes along with it The IDF is enforcing a criminal occupation of Gaza. Why is the death of the criminals more important than the deaths of the victims of occupation? Does Israel control the news in the West? I have no answer to that question. I do know the press behaves as though it is controlled by Israel. Why does not the government of Palestine stop it? The government does not have the arms needed because Israel does not want them to have weapons. The government does not have money to pay men to make peace because Israel does not want them to have money to pay salaries. The government in the West Bank does not have access to Gaza because Israel does not want them to have access to Gaza. So first making it impossible for the Palestinian government to do anything about it Israel then holds the government responsible for not stopping it. Where is even a casual mention of the in the news? If Israel controlled the news it is not clear how the coverage could better promote Israeli propaganda. I don't know though that the timing of this is entirely or at all under Israeli control. Remember that this all started because Hamas, feeling its oats as the new government of "Palestine," has decided to continue to step up terrorist operations against Israel, apparently not fully grasping that _as the government_ these are much more clearly Palestinian acts of war against Israel. It all started because a bunch of murderous, thieving Europeans went to Palestine with the explicite intention to expel the native population and steal their property. I also don't see why all this would be to the Israeli advantage, unless this is combined with a long-term plan to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza and the West Bank. I _hope_ that it is, but I greatly fear that the Israelis still imagine peaceful coexistence with the Palestinians possible -- they've been pursuing that mirage for a very long time now. Why are you hoping for an additional war crime such as was found a hanging offense at Nuremberg? Why do you support such a crime against humanity? Are you a Nazi? Though I do think that it's likely that Israel will emerge from this First Terrorist War that began in 2001 with a stronger position vis-a-vis the Islamic world Resistance to occupation is the lawful right of every occupied people. PS - I know full well that you meant this to be alarming and ominous. However, I'm rather pro-Israeli, and see it as a good development for the world if Israeli power grows. Every attack on Israel is completely lawful. http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml Killing Israelis accords with international law by Matt Giwer, © 2004 [March] Israel and its supporters, affectionately known as Izziehuggers , bemoan the loss of lives proclaimed innocent when Israelis die. That is the usual "poor us" self-pity. Like it or not, international law is on the side of the Palestinians. International law specifically approves attacking members of a foreign military and the destruction of military assets. Attacking members of the foreign military with deadly force is approved by the Geneva and Hague treaties. These agreements do not distinguish between on and off duty. They do not distinguish between active duty and reserve. Israel has universal military service. After all the loopholes and caveats are considered 25-30% of Israelis are either active duty or reserve military. All of them are legitimate targets. It would be improbably bad luck to bomb any gathering of Israelis and not injure or kill at least one member of the Israeli military. The simple presence of one member of the military, active or reserve, justifies any and all attacks. Israel uses this principle when it kills a dozen to get just one so there can be no objection to it. In Israel the public transportation system is a military asset. It is used every day to move troops around the country and back and forth from the occupied territories. In time of war the entire system is commandeered to move troops to the front. They are as much a military asset as a Humvee or a tank or a train in Nazi Germany. Destroying them is not only legitimate but specifically approved. In both cases those who might actually qualify as innocent such as children are considered collateral damage. That makes them unfortunate and unintended casualties in an otherwise lawful attack. The parents know the danger to which they expose their children. The ratio of collateral damage to the intended action is not a consideration in that deaths and injuries are accepted when destroying military assets such as buses. As there is no ratio between a bus and a life it is not a consideration. Israel recognizes the acceptability of collateral loss of life and limb. It dropped a one ton bomb into an apartment building at 2am to kill one man. In the process seventeen others were killed and over a hundred injured. The Prime Minister personally declared this to be a successful operation. Israeli crocodile tears over their own dead while they do the same and worse is simply a propaganda ploy -- one last cynical use for the dead. Israel does have a way out of this. It can simply stop hiding its military among civilians. It can prohibit its civilian population from using military assets such as the bus system. If it were to take those steps it would have justification to object when civilians are harmed. Not only is this impractical it is in fact impossible. Ability to comply with the rules does not change or even mitigate the rules. As long as Israel hides its military among the civilian population all attacks are lawful. Not only are they lawful but Israel excuses its killing of civilians with exactly this argument. It states Palestinian freedom fighters aka terrorists are hiding among the civilian population. Therefore civilians casualties do not mitigate its attacks on its enemies. Reference Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Articles 48-78 Paradise Now doesn't go this far and is still condemned. No question why Zionists have worked so hard to shut down this website. Page reads: 19038 -- If the war on terror stops the price of oil goes back to $30 per barrel and all the investments in ethanol plants go into bankruptcy. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3667 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml environmentalism http://www.giwersworld.org/environment/aehb.phtml a9 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote:
Jordan wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. True. The advantage of hitting Damascus, though, especially if it's repeated and especially if collateral damage kills some rich Damascene civilians, is that it brings home to Syria that there could be a _big_ personal cost, felt by the Syrian ruling elite, for supporting attacks on Israel. Heck, I think that Israel should _target_ Assad, and then others in the Syrian leadership, in the hopes of making that country collapse into civil war as the hyena-like survivors struggle for supremacy. The Syrian elite has spent a good deal of the last few decades causing chaos in Lebanon and death everywhere abroad. Let them have a taste of what it's like, at home. Couldn't happen to a nicer buncha guys Don't you think it would help its international position for Israel to end its occupation of southern Syria before making demands on Syria? It has been well known for year in Israel, right from Moshe Dayan, that it provoked Syria into defending itself during the 1967 war solely for the purpose of stealing the Syrian Heights. Do you mean the Golan Heights, where the Syrian Army had been firing artillery down on Israeli civilians for the eighteen years preceding the 1967 war? ALV |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
birdboy2000 wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Jordan wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. True. The advantage of hitting Damascus, though, especially if it's repeated and especially if collateral damage kills some rich Damascene civilians, is that it brings home to Syria that there could be a _big_ personal cost, felt by the Syrian ruling elite, for supporting attacks on Israel. Heck, I think that Israel should _target_ Assad, and then others in the Syrian leadership, in the hopes of making that country collapse into civil war as the hyena-like survivors struggle for supremacy. The Syrian elite has spent a good deal of the last few decades causing chaos in Lebanon and death everywhere abroad. Let them have a taste of what it's like, at home. Couldn't happen to a nicer buncha guys Don't you think it would help its international position for Israel to end its occupation of southern Syria before making demands on Syria? It has been well known for year in Israel, right from Moshe Dayan, that it provoked Syria into defending itself during the 1967 war solely for the purpose of stealing the Syrian Heights. You mean the heights which were being used as bases to shell Israeli civilians? No, I mean what really was going on not Israeli propaganda. -- The good thing about the Hamas win in Palestine is the US stopped pushing for democratic elections in Syria. The only way to get sense into a neocon is with a two by four. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3639 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Larry Shiff http://www.giwersworld.org/computers/newsagent.phtml a8 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Andrew Venor wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Jordan wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. True. The advantage of hitting Damascus, though, especially if it's repeated and especially if collateral damage kills some rich Damascene civilians, is that it brings home to Syria that there could be a _big_ personal cost, felt by the Syrian ruling elite, for supporting attacks on Israel. Heck, I think that Israel should _target_ Assad, and then others in the Syrian leadership, in the hopes of making that country collapse into civil war as the hyena-like survivors struggle for supremacy. The Syrian elite has spent a good deal of the last few decades causing chaos in Lebanon and death everywhere abroad. Let them have a taste of what it's like, at home. Couldn't happen to a nicer buncha guys Don't you think it would help its international position for Israel to end its occupation of southern Syria before making demands on Syria? It has been well known for year in Israel, right from Moshe Dayan, that it provoked Syria into defending itself during the 1967 war solely for the purpose of stealing the Syrian Heights. Do you mean the Golan Heights, where the Syrian Army had been firing artillery down on Israeli civilians for the eighteen years preceding the 1967 war? Actually I was refering to the shelling of Israelis who were living on stolen Syrian land fronting the Sea of Galilee. Syria certainly has a right to shell its own territory I have similarly suggested Syria lease the Heights to Iran as a down range missile test range. If there was a dispute over the land in question then it could certainly have been put to international arbitration. In any event, despite the Israeli propaganda, Moshe Dayan give the real and only reason for provoking Syria. To steal the land. That is what he said. It has been confirmed by his daughter. It was this revelation which shot down the Israeli propaganda. The propaganda has been discredited. There is no point in trying to resurrect it today. -- A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Pro-Israel is anti-American. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3642 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Lawful to bomb Israelis http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml a11 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote: Jordan wrote: Don't you think it would help its international position for Israel to end its occupation of southern Syria before making demands on Syria? No. I think it would help its international position for Israel to _annex_ the Golan Heights and then reply to all questions about their future disposition with "They're Israeli national territory. What are you offering us to purchase them?" This is also how Israel should have dealt with the issues of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. It has been well known for year in Israel, right from Moshe Dayan, that it provoked Syria into defending itself during the 1967 war solely for the purpose of stealing the Syrian Heights. LOL!!! And the Israelis used their magic mind control rays to force the Arab commanders into massing their air and armor for an attack? - Jordan |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Rob Arndt wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. Dean My thoughts exactly... why shatter the windows of Assad's palace when you can shatter the ENTIRE palace with Assad in residence??? I think THAT message would be much clearer to Damascus. Yeah. In the *******'s last, pain-filled moments of life he might think "Hey! I should have just stayed in the West and been an ordinary guy, instead of following in my father's footsteps as an Evil Dictator. I'm still happy that Zarqawi died slowly, in pain, and in the knowledge that he had been captured. I hope that he went to Hell in full awareness of the fact that the Americans had captured his secret organizational documents and now had the ability to roll up his network. It's always a Happy Moment when people like that get what they deserve. Too bad Arafat died of natural causes. But at least the Palestinian rat*******s are getting some suffering now to teach them that Terrorism Does Not Pay ... Sincerely Yours, Jordan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Matt Giwer wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. How does that act of war improve matters? By demonstrating to the Syrians that when they commit acts of war against Israel through third party clients, Syria will suffer _direct_ retaliation. I personally think that _whenever_ a Syrian-backed organization hits Israel, the Israelis should pick out a block or two of Damascus -- preferably one inhabited by the Syrian upper clases -- level it, and then do a follow-up raid a half-hour later to take out the rescue parties and any survivors. Let the *******s _bleed_ like they made Lebanon bleed. Sincerely Yours, Jordan |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jordan wrote:
Rob Arndt wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. My thoughts exactly... why shatter the windows of Assad's palace when you can shatter the ENTIRE palace with Assad in residence??? I think THAT message would be much clearer to Damascus. Yeah. In the *******'s last, pain-filled moments of life he might think "Hey! I should have just stayed in the West and been an ordinary guy, instead of following in my father's footsteps as an Evil Dictator. How about his last agonies being breathing cyanide? Would that make you feel better. What did he ever do to you? The man has offered peace to Israel three times in return for the Syrian Heights and every time Israel has refused. You hate him because he has called Israel's bluff? I'm still happy that Zarqawi died slowly, in pain, and in the knowledge that he had been captured. I hope that he went to Hell in full awareness of the fact that the Americans had captured his secret organizational documents and now had the ability to roll up his network. You would have made a great Nazi. You have all the right instincts. Talk about irrational hatred. What did Zarqawi ever do to you? It's always a Happy Moment when people like that get what they deserve. Too bad Arafat died of natural causes. But at least the Palestinian rat*******s are getting some suffering now to teach them that Terrorism Does Not Pay ... If you ever ask how Nazis came to feel about Jews as they did you need only look at your feelings towards non-Jews to understand. Tell me you love Christians to deflect the non-Jews identification of your hatred. It is simply the one hatred you can express openly and feel justified as a zionazi in doing so. -- Hodie postridie Kalendas Iulias MMVI est -- The Ferric Webceasar nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Blame Israel http://www.ussliberty.org a10 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jordan wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Jordan wrote: Don't you think it would help its international position for Israel to end its occupation of southern Syria before making demands on Syria? No. I think it would help its international position for Israel to _annex_ the Golan Heights and then reply to all questions about their future disposition with "They're Israeli national territory. What are you offering us to purchase them?" Formal annexation would be a hanging offense as a crime against humanity was it was found to be at Nuremberg. This is also how Israel should have dealt with the issues of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. How would committing additional crimes against humanity have been a benefit? It has been well known for year in Israel, right from Moshe Dayan, that it provoked Syria into defending itself during the 1967 war solely for the purpose of stealing the Syrian Heights. LOL!!! And the Israelis used their magic mind control rays to force the Arab commanders into massing their air and armor for an attack? You disagree with Moshe Dayan in his specfic statement as to the cause of the fight against Syria during the 1967 war. I am certain you have more knowledge of events than he did in your dreams. That is what he said and his daughter confirmed it. That is what really happened from the lips of the man who was in the best position to know what really happened. Izziehugger propaganda has no standing in this matter. Dayan said letting the farmers encroach on the Heights was one of the two greatest mistakes in his career because it lead to the occupation of Syria and the impossibility of making peace. The other great mistake was letting Jews into Hebron for a passover because they never left and required the domination of an entire city for the sake of a few fanatics. Been there, done that, I got the facts right from the best Israeli sources available. You have only propaganda. -- When western nations renounce the right to resistance to foreign occupation they can honestly demand Palestinians do so. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3650 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml environmentalism http://www.giwersworld.org/environment/aehb.phtml a9 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Israel Threatens to Hit Damascus-Next step of A Clean Break?:
Jordan wrote:
Matt Giwer wrote: Dean A. Markley wrote: Israel need not hit Damascus. All they need do is hit Assad's house near Latakia with a 2000 lb bomb. How does that act of war improve matters? By demonstrating to the Syrians that when they commit acts of war against Israel through third party clients, Syria will suffer _direct_ retaliation. Resistance to occupation is lawful and not an act of war EVEN IF there were evidence of the implicit assertion that Syria were sponsoring it. Capturing a prisoner of war from the occupying power is lawful in international law. Their only obligation is to allow Red Cross visits along with proper treatment in accordance with his rank. Even if Syria or Iran were sponsoring it it would be no different from French support of American colonies or Czech support of Zionists by sending arms to let Stalin pretend innocense. Resistance to occupation is always lawful by any means available. And that is specifically because it was approved against the Nazis in WWII. I personally think that _whenever_ a Syrian-backed organization hits Israel, the Israelis should pick out a block or two of Damascus -- preferably one inhabited by the Syrian upper clases -- level it, and then do a follow-up raid a half-hour later to take out the rescue parties and any survivors. And I think the US should have nuked Tel Aviv in response to the attack on the USS Liberty but opinions vary particularly among Izziehuggers. That would be in similar proportion to Israel's vengence attacks on occupied Gaza. Let the *******s _bleed_ like they made Lebanon bleed. The Druze SLA army that Israel financed to start the civil war in Lebanon (with the hope of establishing a friendly Christian government) was the one which asked Syria to intervene to save their butts. As the SLA was an Israeli puppet we rationally assume that request was made with the approval of Israel. Israel tried to abandon their puppets but public opinion forced the government not only to give them residence but citizenship if they requested it. Do you really expect to get away with Zionist lies when posting to me? The reason you folks try to shut me out of s.h.w-i is because I know the facts and do not subscribe to your izziehugging imaginary history. How does if feel to deal with a man who knows more about Israel than you do? In light of what really happened OTL if you can make a case for Israel and its actions please do so. -- America did not learn from a one day strike by illegals. The only way to teach America a real lesson is to go back to Mexico until America begs you to return. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3644 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml environmentalism http://www.giwersworld.org/environment/aehb.phtml a9 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 07:31 PM |
NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL | MORRIS434 | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 4th 04 03:10 PM |
NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 4th 04 03:09 PM |
Israel pays the price for buying only Boeing (and not Airbus) | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 57 | July 8th 03 12:23 AM |