![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 9:10*am, kd6veb wrote:
Hi Gang * This thread prompted me to think as to how the MXR unit ignores my transponder in my glider which is being pinged regularly where I fly? Explanation anyone or a pointer to where I could find an answer to my question? Thanks. Dave Dave RTFM! This is described in the manual. The MRX uses its internal altimeter to compare to the Mode C altitude tramitted by an transponder. If the values are close it assumes it is your transponder it is seeing and supresses the alert. The exact logic/tollerances it uses however is not described. Darryl |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 10:10*am, kd6veb wrote:
Hi Gang * This thread prompted me to think as to how the MXR unit ignores my transponder in my glider which is being pinged regularly where I fly? As Darryl has explained the MRX is designed to distinguish between your own transponder and the transponders of threat aircraft. However in my PA-28 the MRX seems to get confused at least once on every flight, usually about 10 minutes after takeoff. What happens is that I see a target rapidly converging on me in both altitude and distance then it stays about 0.6 miles from me at the same altitude. If I cycle power on the MRX the target, which was my transponder, goes away usually for the rest of the flight. I adjusted the suppression level but still have not eliminated the problem. I know that my transponder is a bit low on power until it has been responding for about 10 minutes and I assume this is contributing to the problem. It's a bit puzzling that, before the spurious target converges on me, the MRX reports my own transponder squawk and pressure altitude correctly. This would seem to imply that the spurious converging target is not the first acquisition of my transponder signal. I have not sent the MRX back to ZAON for testing since I thought the problem may have been caused by a detuned aircraft transponder antenna. It is missing tip ball. After a bit of investigation I was able to obtain the manufacturer's drawing of the tip ball and found it was made of acrylic, not brass as I had assumed, so it would not have been a factor. Substitution of a different KT 76A would be the next thing to try but I don't have a spare just lying around ![]() Andy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 9:28*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Bruno wrote: On Feb 19, 8:07 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: Bruno wrote: I have now had my unit fail twice without any indication of failure. It still seemed to be working fine until I saw a jet whiz by real close and realized that I hadn't had any alerts for a flight or two. Again, the unit turned on and seemed to be acting fine. *I sent it back to Zaon and they were great and replaced the board to fix it the first time. Do you know if a failed unit like yours can still pick up the glider's own transponder? If it cannot, that would give transponder equipped gliders an easy way to test their MRX. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarmhttp://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz I have a transponder and no you don't pick up yourself. *After reading Randy's reply I think this problem might be a little more wide spread. Glad to be getting the word out. *Bruno - B4 OK, pilots with transponders can check their unit without needing another plane around; of course, they still have be interrogated by ground radar or a TCAS system within 10 miles or so (not sure what the range is). If your MRX isn't picking up your transponder AND you can see the transponder is replying, then the MRX is likely bad. Contact the factory about it. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarmhttp://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz In case people don't know how to do this. Push on the multifunction button on the left to get to the "Local" screen to see what the MRX thinks is your local transponder squawk code and altitude, either from the internal altimeter or transponder (read you user manual). BTW it should be possible at least in principle for the MRX to know the local transponder altitude but not the squawk code - e.g. if the local Mode C transponder is being interrogated by an airborne TCAS which make Mode C but not Mode A interrogations (so the transponder does not get asked to transmit its squawk code. This might happen when on the ground or at low altitude where there are no SSR interrogations. Since the MRX is a black-box it's unclear exactly what it does here. It would be interesting to check if the MRX can show this situation outside SSR coverage. If your glider does not have a transponder and your towplane does it is possible that the MRX will think the towplane transponder is your own (until you get off tow and the altitude difference between what it thinks is the local transponder and its internal altimeter become too large). It may also be possible that even if you have a local transponder that the MRX still thinks the towplane tranponder is yours. So you might see things like intermittent alerts that comes or go or an alert for the tow plane once you get off tow, but not while on tow. It is also possible that the MRX (or any other PCAS unit) gets confused by transponders both in the tow plane and glider replying to interrogations (what's called synchronous garbling). TCAS (and SSR) systems try to de-garble several overlapping signals like this but it is unclear what the MRX can actually do there, if anything. I think the MRX PCAS is a great safety/traffic awareness enhancement and I've flow with them from soon after they were first available. I have great experience with Zaon customer support. I broke my MRX antenna off while swinging my leg over the top of my instrument pedestal and I sent the unit in to have that fixed and have the unit upgraded with a headphone jack and they did this a reasonable cost (I can't remember exactly how much they charged) and they fixed the antenna and also threw in a free spare one. Darryl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 19, 9:53*am, Bruno wrote:
I have debated for a few months if I really should post this or not but think I should share my experience. *First, I LOVE the concept of the PCAS MRX and I have received nothing short of exceptional customer service from Zaon. *I also would strongly recommend to every pilot to purchase one of these fairly inexpensive units. *That said, I would give them the following warning: I have now had my unit fail twice without any indication of failure. It still seemed to be working fine until I saw a jet whiz by real close and realized that I hadn't had any alerts for a flight or two. Again, the unit turned on and seemed to be acting fine. *I sent it back to Zaon and they were great and replaced the board to fix it the first time. A year or so passed and all of a sudden the same thing. *A plane flies close by and I haven't had a alert for 5-6 flights. *I was closely paying attention this time because of my last experience. *I sent the unit back and, again, Zaon surpassed my expectations by replacing a faulty filter this time, sending it back and not charging anything - not even return shipping. *It was well out of warranty. *Wow! *Great customer service Zaon. I called and spoke with Zaon after this second fix. *When this particular part fails on the Zaon PCAS there is no way for the unit to tell that there is anything wrong. *It just doesn't pick up any signals. *Therefore, it can't warn you if it is broken. *I would be very surprised if there are not at least a few other units out there that have this faulty part but the owner still thinks that everything is ok. Suggestions: 1. *See and avoid. *Don't ever rely on any instrument or other person to watch out for other aircraft instead of doing it yourself -no brainer. 2. *If your PCAS unit has not picked up an aircraft that it should have you might want to consider it may have this problem. 3. *Fly far, land out every once in a while because you are pushing, have fun and be safe. Has anyone else had a similar experience with their MRX having problems? Bruno - B4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:53:50 -0800 (PST), Bruno
wrote: I have now had my unit fail twice without any indication of failure. It still seemed to be working fine until I saw a jet whiz by real close and realized that I hadn't had any alerts for a flight or two. Flarm and compatible units may develop a very similiar fault. These devices will show no apparent sign of malfunction, though they have become almost "deaf". The cause seems to be in the damage caused by static charges in the receiver circuit; the antenna probably gets the static from the plastic canopy. Or maybe from the pilot itself (especially after touching/cleaning the canopy on a dry day). send the unit back for repair, if it doesn't spot other gliders in flight (known to have a flarm on board). Unfortunately, ground testing isn't conclusive, as the damaged receiver still gets messages from nearby gliders (less than 50-100 meters). Aldo Cernezzi |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FOR SALE: ZAON MRX | RW | Soaring | 0 | June 20th 08 05:18 PM |
Zaon XRX and a Garmin 496 | Marco Leon | Piloting | 2 | October 26th 07 06:33 PM |
GPS intrference from Zaon PCAS ?? | Carl | Soaring | 9 | May 31st 07 05:12 AM |
OT - warning to HAL RC autopilot users | ManhattanMan | Piloting | 2 | May 23rd 07 10:13 PM |
I got my Zaon XRX PCAS test flight | cpu | Products | 3 | January 27th 06 01:13 AM |