![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 7:28*pm, wrote:
There was a conscious decision not to change MSH in rules as it also then affects scoring equations and the scoring program. Ok, it was deliberate, but you didn't answer the question "How would MSH be specified under this rule for the scenario outlined above? How will MSH be specified as MSL without conflicting with the definition of MSH? What definition of top of start cylinder will be printed on the task sheet under the new rule for the scenario I defined? Some is us that found the MSH definition used for years to be completely unambiguous now have to find a new understanding. Andy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 10:18*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: Just to expand a little on UH... The CD will decide on a start height -- 3500 or more AGL, 10,000 or less AGL, 500 feet below the clouds or tops of dry thermals, thinking about how long it takes late starters to climb, etc. The CD will then do the heavy math to translate this height to MSL and he'll announce a MSL start top with nice big even numbers. Now you look at your MSL altimeter and know if you're over the top or not. No more trying to decide if you're over or under 6342 feet MSL because the airport was at 1342. This should avoid addition mistakes (which I have made too), *start gates with weird MSL heights, endless radio calls to the advisers asking MSL or AGL altitudes and so forth. It should also avoid confusion we had last year with scorers and winscore getting confused with each other over MSL/AGL Same on finishing. The CD will decide a decent height for airport, traffic, terrain, and announce a MSL height so it's easy and quick to see if you're over or under. John Cochrane BB Much better, Thanks ! Now if we can figure out how to avoid the pile-up just below the top of the start cylinder... Thanks again, See ya, Dave "YO electric" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 8:18*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: Just to expand a little on UH... The CD will decide on a start height -- 3500 or more AGL, 10,000 or less AGL, 500 feet below the clouds or tops of dry thermals, thinking about how long it takes late starters to climb, etc. The CD will then do the heavy math to translate this height to MSL and he'll announce a MSL start top with nice big even numbers. Now you look at your MSL altimeter and know if you're over the top or not. No more trying to decide if you're over or under 6342 feet MSL because the airport was at 1342. This should avoid addition mistakes (which I have made too), *start gates with weird MSL heights, endless radio calls to the advisers asking MSL or AGL altitudes and so forth. It should also avoid confusion we had last year with scorers and winscore getting confused with each other over MSL/AGL Same on finishing. The CD will decide a decent height for airport, traffic, terrain, and announce a MSL height so it's easy and quick to see if you're over or under. John Cochrane BB All well and good but rule 10.8.5.1.3 should then read "The Top of the start cylinder shall be specified and labeled as MSL." This avoids the conflict with the definition of MSH and removes the considerable confusion caused by the conflicting rules, especially for those that didn't find the old rules confusing at all. Please don't add to the confusion by mixing the terms height and altitude. I hope the CD, under the new rules, will announce a maximum start altitude and a minimum finish altitude. Use the term height and the confusion starts all over again. Andy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy for Rules Committtee!
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to agree with Andy - Height and Altitude are different animals!
I also agree with the intent of the change, since it always seemed absurd to specify a start height, with the resulting "Math in the Cockpit" nightmare - especially when flying at a new constest site. At the risk of adding more complication, perhaps we need to add some new terms/definitions: Maximum Start Altitude (MSA): Maximum Start Height (MSH), as set by the CD, adjusted for start point elevation. This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Minimum Finish Altitude (MFA): Minimum Finish Height (MFH), as set by the CD, adjusted for finish point elevation. This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Yeah, I know, more rules - but the devil is in the details, as usual. Cheers, Kirk 66 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was a concious decision not to change MSH in rules as it also
then affects scoring equations and the scoring program. Too late, the scoring program is already affected. Given the obvious confusion this issue generates, the user interface of the scoring program will have to be changed to clearly indicate to the scorer which altitude is to be entered. Guy Byars |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 8:47*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
I have to agree with Andy - Height and Altitude are different animals! I also agree with the intent of the change, since it always seemed absurd to specify a start height, with the resulting "Math in the Cockpit" nightmare - especially when flying at a new constest site. At the risk of adding more complication, perhaps we need to add some new terms/definitions: Maximum Start Altitude (MSA): *Maximum Start Height (MSH), as set by the CD, adjusted for start point elevation. *This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. *It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Minimum Finish Altitude (MFA): *Minimum Finish Height (MFH), as set by the CD, adjusted for finish point elevation. This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. *It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Yeah, I know, more rules - but the devil is in the details, as usual. Cheers, Kirk 66 We will revisit the language in the next rules cycle. Rules for 2010 are complete and approved. Cheers UH |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Feb 23, 8:47 am, "kirk.stant" wrote: I have to agree with Andy - Height and Altitude are different animals! I also agree with the intent of the change, since it always seemed absurd to specify a start height, with the resulting "Math in the Cockpit" nightmare - especially when flying at a new constest site. At the risk of adding more complication, perhaps we need to add some new terms/definitions: Maximum Start Altitude (MSA): Maximum Start Height (MSH), as set by the CD, adjusted for start point elevation. This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Minimum Finish Altitude (MFA): Minimum Finish Height (MFH), as set by the CD, adjusted for finish point elevation. This is the number given to the contest pilots during the task briefing. It is an altitude - you read it off your altimeter, set to local QNH. Yeah, I know, more rules - but the devil is in the details, as usual. Cheers, Kirk 66 We will revisit the language in the next rules cycle. Rules for 2010 are complete and approved. Cheers UH I like the change! Makes life simpler. Thanks. Hartley Falbaum "KF" USA |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too late, the scoring program is already affected.
Sorry to hear that. I'm so old I remember when the programmer was in charge of the program, not the other way round. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all you guys working on the rules - a thankless job at best!
Good luck on the grid this year! Kirk 66 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA Competition Rules poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | September 30th 08 11:22 PM |
US Competition Rules Subcommittee Nominations | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | June 27th 08 01:13 PM |
2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | December 31st 07 07:21 PM |
USA competition rules re team flying? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 5 | October 5th 07 11:35 PM |
Competition rules summary? | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 2 | January 21st 04 08:25 PM |