![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 14, 10:18*am, (Richard Lancaster)
wrote: Hi, I've put some lecture slides on the following topics: * Principles of glider flight * Glider instruments onto the web site: http://www.carrotworks.com/ Regards, Richard Generally excellent for an introductory presentation. There are a few very minor issues that only an engineer or aerodynamisist would catch. One is the use of the Greek letter Alpha to label the AoA of the fin in a skid - Beta is correct. Another is the description of the secondary effect of roll with the application of yaw inputs (Yaw to roll coupling). You are correct that this is momentarily due to a spanwise difference in airspeed but you failed to mention that the continued, and much larger, effect is due to dihedral. Your description of 'adverse' yaw is correct but I cringe at the negative connotation of the word. Adverse yaw is not "bad" yaw - it's just what ailerons do. In fact, 'adverse' yaw can be quite useful in soaring turns as well as in crosswind landings. BTW, your description of how lift is generated is just fine for this sort of presentation. Some will argue endlessly about it without reaching a consensus but yours is more than good enough. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 14, 1:24*pm, bildan wrote:
On Apr 14, 10:18*am, (Richard Lancaster) wrote: Hi, I've put some lecture slides on the following topics: * Principles of glider flight * Glider instruments onto the web site: http://www.carrotworks.com/ Regards, Richard Generally excellent for an introductory presentation. *There are a few very minor issues that only an engineer or aerodynamisist would catch. *One is the use of the Greek letter Alpha to label the AoA of the fin in a skid - Beta is correct. Another is the description of the secondary effect of roll with the application of yaw inputs (Yaw to roll coupling). *You are correct that this is momentarily due to a spanwise difference in airspeed but you failed to mention that the continued, and much larger, effect is due to dihedral. *Your description of 'adverse' yaw is correct but I cringe at the negative connotation of the word. *Adverse yaw is not "bad" yaw - it's just what ailerons do. *In fact, 'adverse' yaw can be quite useful in soaring turns as well as in crosswind landings. BTW, your description of how lift is generated is just fine for this sort of presentation. *Some will argue endlessly about it without reaching a consensus but yours is more than good enough. I was maybe a little imprecise in my niggle, but Kevin has described it very well. My main criticism would be that glider pilots don't really need to know this. The rest of the stuff is fine. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike the Strike wrote:
... There are a few very minor issues that only an engineer or aerodynamisist would catch. One is the use of the Greek letter Alpha to label the AoA of the fin in a skid - Beta is correct.... Mike Hmmm...beta is yaw angle, and alpha is AoA. In referring to side forces generated by a vertical fin, beta is not quite the controlling factor, is it, when the rudder effect is included? Brian W |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 15, 8:24*am, bildan wrote:
One is the use of the Greek letter Alpha to label the AoA of the fin in a skid - Beta is correct. In mathematics variable names are without meaning and therefore interchangeable, so I don't see how you can say that a particular labeling is correct or incorrect, but at most that it follow or does not follow some convention. It is true that when considering an entire aircraft it is conventional to use Beta for yaw, but if you are considering the fin as an airfoil in isolation then Alpha is perfectly reasonable in order to use the same equations as you would for other airfoils. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the comments.
You wouldn't believe how much time I spent on the first few slides of the Lift / Drag lecture, the bit covering how a wing generates lift, to try to make them benign with respect to controversy but still say something useful and meaningful. Kevin, when I get a chance I will go back and review the streamline and force diagrams on pages 7 and 8 of the Lift / Drag lecture. It does look like they might be slightly erroneous, but I just want to check back through the literature and dig out some experimental results before I make any changes. Bildan, with regard to yaw generating roll via dihedral effects I do actually say that in the slide. However the section on the effects of the controls is going to get a rework at some point. It's the only point in all three lectures where the audience without fail zones out on you and looses interest. So I need to think up some way of making it more interesting. Regards, Richard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 5:10*am, (Richard Lancaster)
wrote: Thanks for the comments. You wouldn't believe how much time I spent on the first few slides of the Lift / Drag lecture, the bit covering how a wing generates lift, to try to make them benign with respect to controversy but still say something useful and meaningful. Kevin, when I get a chance I will go back and review the streamline and force diagrams on pages 7 and 8 of the Lift / Drag lecture. *It does look like they might be slightly erroneous, but I just want to check back through the literature and dig out some experimental results before I make any changes. Bildan, with regard to yaw generating roll via dihedral effects I do actually say that in the slide. *However the section on the effects of the controls is going to get a rework at some point. *It's the only point in all three lectures where the audience without fail zones out on you and looses interest. *So I need to think up some way of making it more interesting. Regards, Richard You're right, I seem to have missed the section on yaw to roll due to dihedral. I apologize. Just a thought. This isn't exactly fair - it's clear you spent a lot of effort on the graphics - but just repeating the same graphics style with minor changes with different text can be boring. There's an easy way to illustrate slides and get more color and realism by using a flight simulator like Condor. I think Uros would grant you the right to use the graphics if you give full credit. The flight sim technique is to set up a situation you want to illustrate and pause the simulator at just the right moment. Select the outside view you like then take a JPEG screenshot. The resulting JPEG file can then be edited with a graphics or photo-editor to add additional graphics or text. The result can be quite pleasing. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SU-30 MKI at Red Flag Lecture | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 1 | November 13th 08 06:51 PM |
Catalina Lecture - LHR | Merlin | Piloting | 0 | January 30th 06 09:39 AM |
Catalina Lecture - LHR | Merlin | Restoration | 0 | January 30th 06 09:39 AM |
Barnaby Lecture Oct 1st | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 02:40 PM |
FA: A-10 and F-14 slides | THE RIPPER | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 26th 04 06:37 AM |