I'm smarter than you

On 2010-10-18 18:16:51 -0500, Zapanaz
said:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:09:27 -0400, Ari Silverstein
wrote:

*LOLOLOLOLOLOL*

"LOLOLOLOLOLOL"?

What is that supposed to mean, exactly? Are people supposed to read
it, and think "that guy is laughing really hard"?

It seems instead though that "LOL" has become a word, and when you
type LOLOLOLOLOLOL you are actually saying "LOLOLOLOLOLOL" and intend
it to be taken that way. Only I really have no idea what the word
LOLOLOLOLOLOL means. Could you clarify that for me?

You could almost say that around a Lollipop!
--
(\__/)
(='.'=)
('')_('')

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:09:27 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:

I don't count 15 as a child in my eyes.
Having sex with many 13-15 aged women, I can
tell you that they are ready for sex.
This does not mean that I should abuse them.
I do not. I am a very smart peron with degrees
in seven sciences and I know how to penetrate
young nookie. Easy, lots of lube and love.

Mark

I hope you die an excruciatingly painful death that lasts years.

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:09:46 +0000 (UTC), RMCG wrote:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:09:27 -0400, Mark wrote:

I don't count 15 as a child in my eyes.
Having sex with many 13-15 aged women, I can
tell you that they are ready for sex.
This does not mean that I should abuse them.
I do not. I am a very smart peron with degrees
in seven sciences and I know how to penetrate
young nookie. Easy, lots of lube and love.

Mark

I hope you die an excruciatingly painful death that lasts years.

Hey, works for me, I hate pedofukks like Mark(ie).
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

Once Upon A Time,
Mark wrote:

On Sep 30, 5:46 pm, Duggy wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:39 am, Mark wrote:

but for real
scientific research I suggest starting with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmata#Scientific_research
and following the references cited there.
It will lead to more sources, which should be examined.
But if you're trying to tell me that Wikipedia is a valid
source for information, then you are sadly, sadly
mistaken.

Where did he say valid source of information? He said stating point.

Shesh.

Misallocated shesh. He offered up wiki as more valid. It isn't.

There. I just edited it so that it's more valid. I hope you're happy now.


YOU'RE WELCOME.


**
Captain Infinity

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:43:01 -0400, Captain Infinity wrote:

Once Upon A Time,
Mark wrote:

On Sep 30, 5:46 pm, Duggy wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:39 am, Mark wrote:

but for real
scientific research I suggest starting with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmata#Scientific_research
and following the references cited there.
It will lead to more sources, which should be examined.
But if you're trying to tell me that Wikipedia is a valid
source for information, then you are sadly, sadly
mistaken.

Where did he say valid source of information? He said stating point.

Shesh.

Misallocated shesh. He offered up wiki as more valid. It isn't.

There. I just edited it so that it's more valid. I hope you're happy now.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

**
Captain Infinity

Here.

Somehting for you.

http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/1...koff_small.jpg

Mark

https://twitter.com/CorruptNutsac
http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze