A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Piper Lance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 03, 09:07 PM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Get a Piper Comanche 250.
Or a 210 (if the price is right)

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
  #2  
Old November 2nd 03, 10:19 PM
Dashi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why, reason, references, sources?


"Tony" wrote in message
...
Get a Piper Comanche 250.
Or a 210 (if the price is right)

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.



  #3  
Old November 3rd 03, 04:25 AM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Comanche 250: Safe, Fun and easy to fly, Fast, cheap purchase price,
cheap to fly, (i dont think as cheap as the arrow) Good backing from
many different company webco, international comanche socity, Lots of
mechanics work and know there stuff about the comanche. I was even told
a story about a guy taking off from Long Beach airport in a 1964
Comanche 250 1,100 pounds over gross and flying no stop to Japan. Now if
thats true I have no idea.

Cessna 210: my dad had a 1982 T210N. He said thats been the best plane
he flew in his life. The 82 210 has a fast cruise seed of 200 or so and
can go for ever, good landing gear, High useful load (my dads was around
1,500) They also are safe, and when you go to sell them you could get
your money back and then some. But they aren't the cheapest to fly nor
to buy.
HOPE THIS HELPS
I would go with the Comanche

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
  #4  
Old November 3rd 03, 02:56 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If he wants a Lance it is unlikely that a Comanche is going to be big
enough. An 1982 210 isn't in the same price range.

Mike
MU-2


"Tony" wrote in message
...
Comanche 250: Safe, Fun and easy to fly, Fast, cheap purchase price,
cheap to fly, (i dont think as cheap as the arrow) Good backing from
many different company webco, international comanche socity, Lots of
mechanics work and know there stuff about the comanche. I was even told
a story about a guy taking off from Long Beach airport in a 1964
Comanche 250 1,100 pounds over gross and flying no stop to Japan. Now if
thats true I have no idea.

Cessna 210: my dad had a 1982 T210N. He said thats been the best plane
he flew in his life. The 82 210 has a fast cruise seed of 200 or so and
can go for ever, good landing gear, High useful load (my dads was around
1,500) They also are safe, and when you go to sell them you could get
your money back and then some. But they aren't the cheapest to fly nor
to buy.
HOPE THIS HELPS
I would go with the Comanche

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.



  #5  
Old November 3rd 03, 04:15 PM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just opening up his choices!
Cant go wrong with a Comanche

Im not going to bring the T-Tailed Lacne down but how long did they make
it. It wasnt for very long. If it is such a good airplane then why did
piper quit making it, money or something like that, I looked into buying
a turbo T-Tailed lance. But then the Comanche came along. So now we are
going to be getting a 64 comanche 250 8389P
Hope this help
Tony

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
  #6  
Old November 4th 03, 03:20 AM
Wayne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I work at a repair shop and all the mechanics and even the people in the
office seem to hate them. They seem to be fuel hogs, are very tight to work
on (esp the turbo model) and people always say bad things about the T tail.
No personaly experience here, if they are disliked, they should be cheaper
and that would just make it a better buy and long as you can live with the
way it work, why not. Somebody bought the AMC Gremlins when they were new
right? Not saying the planes are Gremlins though.


Wayne

"Renee Purner" wrote in message
om...
I have just finsihed my Instrument rating and it is about time to move up

to
soemthing faster that hauls more than my wonderful Piper Cherokee 140. An
interetsing possibility is a Piper Lance or Turbo Lance. I am open to
comments and hope to get some!

John Purner
Editor - The $100 Hamburger
http://www.100dollarhamburger.com




  #7  
Old November 4th 03, 07:47 PM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would look at a Cherokee 6 300. I have seen some with 7 seats in them
(one child seat) they look to be big inside. I dont know anything about
them, but i hear good things.

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Piper J3 Cub Parts BFC Aviation Marketplace 0 September 24th 04 03:20 PM
Piper 6.00x6 Nose Wheel and Fork? mikem General Aviation 5 March 5th 04 11:34 PM
Piper Cub: "A Reflection in Time"... fine art print highdesertexplorer Aviation Marketplace 0 January 13th 04 03:47 AM
The Piper Cubs That Weren't Veeduber Home Built 5 August 28th 03 04:38 AM
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance [email protected] Owning 5 July 22nd 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.