![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't forget that a large part of the insurance is for the hull, and that
the rate for liability is relatively constant. You can decrease your premium by minimizing the amount of hull insurance to the level that you can afford to lose in case of a mishap. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:54:15 GMT, "Viperdoc"
wrote: Don't forget that a large part of the insurance is for the hull, and that the rate for liability is relatively constant. You can decrease your premium by minimizing the amount of hull insurance to the level that you can afford to lose in case of a mishap. I was under the impression that if your insured value is too low, it is in the interest of the insurance company to declare a fixable plane a total lose, give you the insured value, fix it up and sell it for market value. The excess liability went from $2500 to $5000, so everything doubled, not just the hull, and some pilots were unable to get smooth. Recently a new company entered the Cirrus market which seems to be lowering the rates. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Viperdoc wrote: Don't forget that a large part of the insurance is for the hull, and that the rate for liability is relatively constant. You can decrease your premium by minimizing the amount of hull insurance to the level that you can afford to lose in case of a mishap. So, you insure the plane for half what it's worth. Then some clown runs into the aileron with the lawnmower and does $1,000 damage. The insurance company totals the aircraft, puts $1,000 into repairs, and resells it for a nice profit. Enjoy your settlement. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:45:26 -0500, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: So, you insure the plane for half what it's worth. Then some clown runs into the aileron with the lawnmower and does $1,000 damage. The insurance company totals the aircraft, puts $1,000 into repairs, and resells it for a nice profit. Enjoy your settlement. Although under insuring the plane gives you a built in deductible. If you only insure the plane for 1/2 of its value you wouldn't file a claim until the cost of repair exceeded 1/2 the value of the plane so your example would not happen. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:49:39 GMT, ArtP
wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:45:26 -0500, "G.R. Patterson III" wrote: So, you insure the plane for half what it's worth. Then some clown runs into the aileron with the lawnmower and does $1,000 damage. The insurance company totals the aircraft, puts $1,000 into repairs, and resells it for a nice profit. Enjoy your settlement. Although under insuring the plane gives you a built in deductible. If you only insure the plane for 1/2 of its value you wouldn't file a claim until the cost of repair exceeded 1/2 the value of the plane so your example would not happen. I think George was being a bit facetious with the lawn mower and $1000, but it wouldn't take a lot of structural damage to reach half the value of the hull. That means if your plane is worth 300,000, you insure it for $150,000 and the damage is close to that, they can total the plane, give you a check for $150,000, repair the plane and sell it for $300,000. Pretty good profit for them and loss for you. As to your example of not filing a claim until the cost exceeded half the value, it would only guarantee the insurance company would total it out and you'd be out half the value of the plane. Never be under insured. It's as bad, or even worst than over insured which is just wasted money. Under insured can be downright expensive. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
High Performance Single Engine Choices | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 82 | January 6th 04 07:32 PM |
High Flight NOTAM | Kirk Stant | Military Aviation | 1 | September 10th 03 03:31 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |