![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I had a similar experience with metal flakes in the filter we
sent the filter off to Lycoming to find out where the metal was coming from. Answer: cam, lifters, and something on the pistons. Went the Factory Reman route. "Les Sullivan" wrote in message om... I have a 1972 Cessna 172 with a Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine and it runs beautifully. It is on UK private category. The engine is "original" and total time is about 2800 hours. The engine had a thorough top overhaul quite a few years ago, maybe around 1500 hours (new pistons etc) and has no problems with compression, oil consumption, vibration or indeed anything at all. It is well looked after. Now the but..... At its last annual (Christmas) some metal particles were found in the oil filter. -------------- The lab report says: Filter section weight 397 milligrams Major: - lead flakes measuring 0.1mm across Minor: - blank Traces: - Aluminium alloys - corroded fragments measuring up to 1.6 x 0.5mm Iron - 0.5% Nickel - 0.5% Chromium steel such as sae8617,8620 or 8740 flakes measuring up to 0.9mm across Iron - A low alloy carbon steel with no significant alloying constituents such as sae 1010 slivers measuring up to 0.9 x 0.3mm Miscellaneous - mainly fine particles. -------------- I think it now means a complete overhaul to zero time. The choice seems to be: a) Factory Zero timed engine b) Factory overhauled engine c) Have my own engine worked on What are your views about which way to go with this? It is awfully tempting to keep the plane running and cut open the new oil filter at, say, 20hours and see if there are any more particles. As I said, compressions, oil pressure, power etc. are all good. Maybe my greatest fear is that if I keep it flying, there may be damage caused to the crankshaft or something which causes a big price increase at overhaul due to the part being rejected. Any advice / comments greatly appreciated. Les |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What was it said a few months ago on a thread like this? "It's not time to
overhaul an engine until you can read the serial numbers on the metal found in the oil screen" Seriously though, if it's a 32 year old engine at 2800 hours making metal, it's a non-too-subtle statement that it's time. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * The prime directive of Linux: * * - learn what you don't know, * * - teach what you do. * * (Just my 20 USm$) * ************************************************** *********************** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 1972 Volkswagon with a Volkswagon engine and it runs beautifully.
The engine is "original" and the speedo shows 280,000 miles (total time 2800 hours times 100 miles per hour). The engine had a thorough top overhaul quite a few years ago, maybe around 150,000 miles (new pistons etc) and has no problems with compression, oil consumption, vibration or indeed anything at all. It is well looked after and has won many quarter mile drag races, at least one a week! Now the but..... At its last annual (Christmas) some metal particles were found in the oil filter. Any advice / comments greatly appreciated. "Believe it or not?" ;) Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument overhaul - Are all overhauls created equal? | RonLee | Home Built | 1 | February 7th 05 06:35 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |