![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike, Who did you ask? Tha manufactuerer? Seems like these stats would
be specific to the make and model of the instruments. -Sami Mike Rapoport wrote: I asked the same question after my only (vacuum) AI failied on a flight (turbo Lance) and was told 500 to 1000 hrs for vacuum gyros and 1000 to 2000hrs for electric. If you only have one vacuum AI overhauling it every 500hrs seems prudent. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... As I reading through my aircraft logs, I noticed several replacements of the Directional Gyro and Turn Coordinator. The plane is a 1978 Piper Turbo Arrow 3. Is is normal to need to replace these things every 4-5 years? Does anyone keep statistics or even projections for the mean time between failures on airplane parts? It sure would be useful to know. One would think the manufacturers would publish such information. -Sami |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I asked a large avionics/instrument shop where I got the failed gyro
replaced, so it was one (experienced) guys observation, not a scientific study. There isn't a lot of difference between different vacuum gyros that is going to affect their lifespan. Even with a good filter, there is dust and grit constantly being sucked through the unit and the bearing grease eventually dries out as well. There are larger differences between electric gyros and I asked about the ones installed in my airplane which use a AC and DC power. Look in your logbooks and see how long yours lasted. I'm sure that there are a lot of variables too. If your plane sits outside in Pheonix, the bearing grease will probably dry our faster and if it sits outside in Barrow, it is going to have a lot of very cold starts. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... Mike, Who did you ask? Tha manufactuerer? Seems like these stats would be specific to the make and model of the instruments. -Sami Mike Rapoport wrote: I asked the same question after my only (vacuum) AI failied on a flight (turbo Lance) and was told 500 to 1000 hrs for vacuum gyros and 1000 to 2000hrs for electric. If you only have one vacuum AI overhauling it every 500hrs seems prudent. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... As I reading through my aircraft logs, I noticed several replacements of the Directional Gyro and Turn Coordinator. The plane is a 1978 Piper Turbo Arrow 3. Is is normal to need to replace these things every 4-5 years? Does anyone keep statistics or even projections for the mean time between failures on airplane parts? It sure would be useful to know. One would think the manufacturers would publish such information. -Sami |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: As I reading through my aircraft logs, I noticed several replacements of the Directional Gyro and Turn Coordinator. The plane is a 1978 Piper Turbo Arrow 3. Is is normal to need to replace these things every 4-5 years? Does anyone keep statistics or even projections for the mean time between failures on airplane parts? It sure would be useful to know. One would think the manufacturers would publish such information. I'm late to the party here, but I'll add my two cents: I replaced the vac gyros in my Cherokee a couple years ago, with brand new RC Allen gyros. They're still okay 200+ hour later, but they were NEVER as good as the overhauled Sigma-Tek gyros that they replaced. I had the Sigma-Tek's replaced because they had apparently been overhauled and, presumably, owner installed. No yellow tags, no log entry, so I assumed that they were 20+ years old original gyros, and I fly IFR. When the RC Allens go, I'll seriously consider having them rebuilt by a good overhaul shop, unless there's some compelling reason why I should go out and invest in Sigma-Tek's again. JKG |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. There are some good statistics out there. Flying had an article not
too long ago talking about lifetimes of vacuum pumps, gyros, etc. You have to ask yourself, "Do I really want to wait until it fails?" ------------------------------ Travis "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message hlink.net... I asked the same question after my only (vacuum) AI failied on a flight (turbo Lance) and was told 500 to 1000 hrs for vacuum gyros and 1000 to 2000hrs for electric. If you only have one vacuum AI overhauling it every 500hrs seems prudent. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... As I reading through my aircraft logs, I noticed several replacements of the Directional Gyro and Turn Coordinator. The plane is a 1978 Piper Turbo Arrow 3. Is is normal to need to replace these things every 4-5 years? Does anyone keep statistics or even projections for the mean time between failures on airplane parts? It sure would be useful to know. One would think the manufacturers would publish such information. -Sami |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
FAA Application -- kinds of time | Gary Drescher | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 23rd 04 02:33 PM |
Logging Actual Time | Brenor Brophy | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | November 3rd 04 03:00 PM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
FS: 2002 "Ghosts: A Time Remembered" (Aviation) Calendar | J.R. Sinclair | Military Aviation | 0 | June 14th 04 06:22 AM |