A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flying under Class B



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 04, 08:02 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dude" wrote in message
...

It doesn't vary at all. If you're outside of the Class B airspace ATC
has
no authority to assign altitudes to VFR aircraft.



Steve,

We can argue rules all day long, but the way things are done can make the
results of whats done inside the rules seem strangely dissimilar in the
cockpit.

Whether they have authority or not at all, doesn't matter one wit. They
do
it, and you can respond with compliance or not (since they do not have
authority, you can choose to disregard).

I have given you a real life, and common, example of what happens in my
area. If you choose to not believe me, that is fine. Lots of people fly
down the coast of Florida outside of the class B. Am I the only one who
ever gets an assignment?


I didn't say it wasn't done, I said they don't have the authority to do it.


  #2  
Old September 29th 04, 10:43 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"PaulaJay1" wrote in message
...

What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B
"wedding cake"?


No such mimimum distance exists.



CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie and I have
flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I
don't know if they objected.


There's nothing for them to object to.



Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in VMS I
cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller
wanted me at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he
just being safe for his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum
buffer?


Outside of Class B airspace he has no responsibility for separation and
cannot require VFR aircraft to operate at any particular altitude. Of
course, other regulations can come into play here, such as VFR cruising
altitudes.


  #4  
Old September 30th 04, 01:47 PM
OtisWinslow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There can be a lot of VFR traffic cruising around under the B space. It's
a good idea to just talk to ATC and get their help.


"PaulaJay1" wrote in message
...
What is the minimum legal distance (altitude) to fly VFR under a Class B
"wedding cake"? CLE has a 1900 ft floor at the north side by Lake Erie
and I
have flown at 1800 to go around CLE. I was not talking to CLE so I don't
know
if they objected. Today I was coming around CLE decending IFR. When in
VMS I
cancelled IFR and remained on squak for advisories. The controller wanted
me
at 3000 when under a 4000 ft designated altitude. Was he just being safe
for
his own good or is 1000 ft suggested as the minimum buffer? I know, I
should
have ask him but the frequency was pretty busy.

Chuck



  #5  
Old September 30th 04, 09:00 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



OtisWinslow wrote:

There can be a lot of VFR traffic cruising around under the B space. It's
a good idea to just talk to ATC and get their help.


I've only dealt with Orlando and New York. New York would rather not deal with you
most of the time. Even when they politely acknowledge your presence, they are usually
too busy to advise you about other traffic. One controller stated at a Wings seminar
years ago that most of the time he has the radar set to block low-level VFR returns
'cause they clutter the screen too much. As he put it "The area around the Solberg
VOR looks like a beehive. You're all gonna crash and I don't wanna see it."

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #6  
Old October 1st 04, 02:16 PM
OtisWinslow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I haven't flown around NY. I have dealt with Tampa and Miami .. both of whom
were helpful.


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


OtisWinslow wrote:

There can be a lot of VFR traffic cruising around under the B space. It's
a good idea to just talk to ATC and get their help.


I've only dealt with Orlando and New York. New York would rather not deal
with you
most of the time. Even when they politely acknowledge your presence, they
are usually
too busy to advise you about other traffic. One controller stated at a
Wings seminar
years ago that most of the time he has the radar set to block low-level
VFR returns
'cause they clutter the screen too much. As he put it "The area around the
Solberg
VOR looks like a beehive. You're all gonna crash and I don't wanna see
it."

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to
have
been looking for it.



  #7  
Old October 1st 04, 03:00 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OtisWinslow wrote:

I haven't flown around NY. I have dealt with Tampa and Miami .. both of
whom were helpful.


I fly around NY, and have found the controllers typically quite helpful to
VFR traffic. In fact, I once surprised a VFR-only pilot in our club with
how helpful they are. We were departing Caldwell for the NJ shore in an
aircraft w/o a GPS (it has since been upgraded, of course {8^). His plan
was to fly around the class B to the west. I suggested "through", which
surprised him a little.

But a quick request to TRACON got us not only entry, but a vector to Colts
Neck (which we couldn't receive at our current position/altitude).

As I said, they're very helpful.

There have been a few exceptions, but these were all (as far as I can
recall) recognizably high-workload situations for them.

But this raises a question about which I keep forgetting. I was once IFRing
into Linden - an uncontrolled airport right next to Newark - in VMC. ATC
wanted me to cancel as early as possible of course, and I was perfectly
willing to do so. I just wanted to be below the class B first, but - at
least where I was - the floor was below ATC's MVA. So I cancelled, but I
felt a little odd being in class B having never received explicit clearance
into it.

Silly of me?

- Andrew

  #8  
Old October 1st 04, 04:07 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


But this raises a question about which I keep forgetting. I was once IFRing
into Linden - an uncontrolled airport right next to Newark - in VMC. ATC
wanted me to cancel as early as possible of course, and I was perfectly
willing to do so. I just wanted to be below the class B first, but - at
least where I was - the floor was below ATC's MVA. So I cancelled, but I
felt a little odd being in class B having never received explicit clearance
into it.

Silly of me?


You were on a clearance when you entered Class B. That would be good enough for me.

  #9  
Old October 2nd 04, 03:46 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Andrew Gideon wrote:

But a quick request to TRACON got us not only entry, but a vector to Colts
Neck (which we couldn't receive at our current position/altitude).

As I said, they're very helpful.


That's different. The original poster was suggesting that you request traffic
advisories while under the class-B floor. In my experience, you won't get VFR traffic
advisories from NY ATC.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #10  
Old September 30th 04, 04:36 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One inch under the floor is okay. The area under class B is often
constricted, so it can help to get flight following. Whether ATC has a right
to do it or not, controllers regularly assign altitudes to VFR traffic for
whatever reasons of their own.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? john smith Home Built 11 August 27th 04 02:29 AM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! [email protected] General Aviation 0 March 26th 04 11:24 PM
Progress on Flying Car Steve Dufour General Aviation 5 December 19th 03 03:48 PM
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 November 5th 03 12:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.