![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Remember the "spectator" injury during a launch at the national contest in Tonopah years ago. I remember Tonopah well... I agree that winching can be much safer than aerotow. It is very important that you get experienced people to train you before starting up a winch operation. There was no additional charge to our liability coverage for adding a winch launch to our operation. That was many years ago tho. Boggs |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 10:01*pm, T wrote:
Remember the "spectator" injury during a launch at the national contest in Tonopah years ago. T I do remember. That operation would have violated a major rule of winch launch. That rule is no one or thing can occupy an exclusion area between the glider and winch. If someone enters the exclusion area, the launch is held until the "deck" is clear. The exclusion area will have slightly different definitions depending on airfield layout but it is designed to prevent Tonopah-like accidents even in extreme loss of control situations. Aero tow operations would be well advised to copy this rule. This concept has been extended to the hook-up operation by using Tost quick-links. The strop/safety rope is attached to the glider without being attached to the winch rope. The final safety rope-winch rope connection is made by someone standing out of harm's way and then only when the pilot signals readiness. This way inadvertent rope motion can't put the hook-up/wing runner at risk. Winch operations have very carefully thought out safety procedures which must be scrupulously observed. It's easier to get people to obey safety rules with winch launch since it LOOKS dangerous even though it isn't. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill, I find that interesting. I have never seen that done in many winch
operations at different sites in the UK, and we have a different practice (from the remote hook up) to avoid a different scenario. Do you have a complete set of your winch safety precautions? I would be interested to compare it with our UK norms (not that we have a complete detailed set all in one place covering all UK operations – but we have some national ones, and I have seen quite a few operations in practice). Regards – Chris N. At 17:31 07 March 2012, Bill D wrote: I do remember. That operation would have violated a major rule of winch launch. That rule is no one or thing can occupy an exclusion area between the glider and winch. If someone enters the exclusion area, the launch is held until the "deck" is clear. The exclusion area will have slightly different definitions depending on airfield layout but it is designed to prevent Tonopah-like accidents even in extreme loss of control situations. Aero tow operations would be well advised to copy this rule. This concept has been extended to the hook-up operation by using Tost quick-links. The strop/safety rope is attached to the glider without being attached to the winch rope. The final safety rope-winch rope connection is made by someone standing out of harm's way and then only when the pilot signals readiness. This way inadvertent rope motion can't put the hook-up/wing runner at risk. Winch operations have very carefully thought out safety procedures which must be scrupulously observed. It's easier to get people to obey safety rules with winch launch since it LOOKS dangerous even though it isn't. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 7:13*pm, Chris Nicholas wrote:
Bill, I find that interesting. I have never seen that done in many winch operations at different sites in the UK, and we have a different practice (from the remote hook up) to avoid a different scenario. Do you have a complete set of your winch safety precautions? *I would be interested to compare it with our UK norms (not that we have a complete detailed set all in one place covering all UK operations – but we have some national ones, and I have seen quite a few operations in practice). Regards – Chris N. At 17:31 07 March 2012, Bill D wrote: *I do remember. *That operation would have violated a major rule of winch launch. *That rule is no one or thing can occupy an exclusion area between the glider and winch. *If someone enters the exclusion area, the launch is held until the "deck" is clear. *The exclusion area will have slightly different definitions depending on airfield layout but it is designed to prevent Tonopah-like accidents even in extreme loss of control situations. Aero tow operations would be well advised to copy this rule. This concept has been extended to the hook-up operation by using Tost quick-links. *The strop/safety rope is attached to the glider without being attached to the winch rope. *The final safety rope-winch rope connection is made by someone standing out of harm's way and then only when the pilot signals readiness. *This way inadvertent rope motion can't put the hook-up/wing runner at risk. Winch operations have very carefully thought out safety procedures which must be scrupulously observed. *It's easier to get people to obey safety rules with winch launch since it LOOKS dangerous even though it isn't. Chris, I've sent you my "Field Operations Guide". I recently re-read the BGA winch operation and training guides and find them dramatically improved in the last few years. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back to the original question - Except for insuring the winch itself
as an airport vehicle, we do not pay any extra insurance for our winch operation. The coverage is for flight operations and there is no distinction between aerotow or winch operations. USAIG is our carrier and does not have the litney of restrictions and limitations that the "group" plan has through the well known agent. Bob |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bil, got it, thaanks. I will get back to you by email. Chris.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 8:02*pm, RL wrote:
Back to the original question - Except for insuring the winch itself as an airport vehicle, we do not pay any extra insurance for our winch operation. The coverage is for flight operations and there is no distinction between aerotow or winch operations. USAIG is our carrier and does not have the litney of restrictions and limitations that the "group" plan has through the well known agent. Bob I think the difference in the policies is Costello's policy keeps the winch insurance in effect if you take the winch to a different airfield whereas USAIG's winch coverage is part of your premises insurance so it is only effective on your airfield. I could be out of date on that. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://aircrashed.com/cause/cLAX02LA231.shtml
Scary. Will keep this very much in mind at our contest this summer. Sean F2 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill - Our winch operations are covered for off-site activity in the
same way aero-tow ops are covered if we were to fly from another field. Bob On Mar 7, 11:33*pm, Bill D wrote: On Mar 7, 8:02*pm, RL wrote: I think the difference in the policies is Costello's policy keeps the winch insurance in effect if you take the winch to a different airfield whereas USAIG's winch coverage is part of your premises insurance so it is only effective on your airfield. *I could be out of date on that. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Third party liability insurance | Michal Lewczuk | Soaring | 0 | January 21st 05 11:08 PM |
Hull/Liability Insurance Recommendations | Jim Weir | Piloting | 75 | October 21st 04 04:08 PM |
Hull/Liability Insurance Recommendations | Jim Weir | Owning | 53 | October 20th 04 07:11 AM |
Liability insurance | Ian Cant | Soaring | 14 | June 14th 04 07:27 AM |
Make sure of Your Liability Insurance | Icebound | Piloting | 1 | April 25th 04 09:19 AM |