![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Koopas Ly" wrote in message
om... What should I put under "Type of Event/Situation"? Was it actually a runway incursion? I wasn't ON runway 4R, only beyond the hold short bars between 4L and 4R. I believe AOPA means that you should avoid putting incriminating information on the identification strip (which is what you receive back and what you use to prove you filed the form, so you can avoid enforcement action). In your case, since enforcement action is highly unlikely, it probably doesn't matter. However, generally speaking, what they mean is to write something like "rollout after landing" to describe the situation, rather than using a label that automatically implies a violation, like "runway incursion" or even "failed to stop before hold line". Put all the incriminating stuff in the actual report. Not the piece of paper you might have to turn over to the FAA. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Koopas Ly" wrote in message om... What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form? Never hurts to fill out a NASA form. As others point out, it's not even necessary to think you did anything wrong, however the immunity granted gives a big incentive to bare your soul in the name of aviation safety. People violate ATC instructions all the time. Unless this causes an error that the controller would be dinged for and he needs to cover his butt, or you do something exceedingly dangerous or stupid, nothing ever comes of it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hold lines mean absolutely nothing to ATC. The only thing that
matters is that you didn't actually get onto the runway, past the solid white line. It is a quirk of the FAA about the hold lines and the runway safety area. Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line. Don't cross that and we don't care. Airports Division cares about the runway safety area, which is defined by the hold short lines on the taxiway and usually some kind of markers in the grass alongside the runways at I think 150 feet from the centerline. Koopas Ly wrote: Hi all, After a short local flight, I landed on 4L at HNL and forgot to hold short of 4R. After I made the right turn on taxiway Echo from 4L, the tower (sensing that I was taxiing a bit fast) tells me, in a rather calm voice, "hold short of 4R!". By that time, I had already crossed the 4R hold bars. I was not on runway 4R, just between the hold bars and the runway edge. There was neither departing nor landing traffic. I apologized, and the tower told me to contact ground. Never heard from the tower again. What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form? Thanks, Alex |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote in message news:mENrb.161019$Tr4.433525@attbi_s03...
The hold lines mean absolutely nothing to ATC. The only thing that matters is that you didn't actually get onto the runway, past the solid white line. It is a quirk of the FAA about the hold lines and the runway safety area. Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line. Don't cross that and we don't care. Airports Division cares about the runway safety area, which is defined by the hold short lines on the taxiway and usually some kind of markers in the grass alongside the runways at I think 150 feet from the centerline. That's interesting. It would seem that all of the tower controllers out there do not know this. I've witnessed more than one go around instigated by a tower because another plane was just over the hold short bars (but not on the runway proper). Just a few weeks ago I heard the tower telling a student pilot that he could not land any more traffic on the runway until the student moved his airplane 3 ft. to clear the bars. To be fair, I've only noticed this hyper-picky behavior since the FAA started that runway incursion program several years back. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Galban wrote: That's interesting. It would seem that all of the tower controllers out there do not know this. I've witnessed more than one go around instigated by a tower because another plane was just over the hold short bars (but not on the runway proper). That controller is an idiot. Just a few weeks ago I heard the tower telling a student pilot that he could not land any more traffic on the runway until the student moved his airplane 3 ft. to clear the bars. We will tell the students what they are supposed to do, and that is to stay behind the hold line. But if an airplane crosses the line do you start sending traffic around? Not in a million years. To be fair, I've only noticed this hyper-picky behavior since the FAA started that runway incursion program several years back. Tower managers who come from Centers are the worst to deal with. They're all hot and bothered about trivialities like hold lines and generally make life difficult for a tower controller. We had one here for a few years, he really made the union membership rise. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:54:10 GMT, Newps wrote:
Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line. Don't cross that and we don't care. They =definitely= care at APA. Mark Kolber APA/Denver, Colorado www.midlifeflight.com ====================== email? Remove ".no.spam" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Koopas Ly wrote: What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form? In this case, I think so. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |