A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway Incursion and NASA form



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 10th 03, 06:20 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Koopas Ly" wrote in message
om...
What should I put under "Type of Event/Situation"? Was it actually a

runway
incursion? I wasn't ON runway 4R, only beyond the hold short bars between
4L and 4R.


I believe AOPA means that you should avoid putting incriminating information
on the identification strip (which is what you receive back and what you use
to prove you filed the form, so you can avoid enforcement action).

In your case, since enforcement action is highly unlikely, it probably
doesn't matter. However, generally speaking, what they mean is to write
something like "rollout after landing" to describe the situation, rather
than using a label that automatically implies a violation, like "runway
incursion" or even "failed to stop before hold line".

Put all the incriminating stuff in the actual report. Not the piece of
paper you might have to turn over to the FAA.

Pete


  #2  
Old November 10th 03, 02:26 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Koopas Ly" wrote in message om...

What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form?

Never hurts to fill out a NASA form. As others point out, it's not even necessary
to think you did anything wrong, however the immunity granted gives a big incentive
to bare your soul in the name of aviation safety.

People violate ATC instructions all the time. Unless this causes an error that the
controller would be dinged for and he needs to cover his butt, or you do something
exceedingly dangerous or stupid, nothing ever comes of it.


  #3  
Old November 10th 03, 02:54 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The hold lines mean absolutely nothing to ATC. The only thing that
matters is that you didn't actually get onto the runway, past the solid
white line. It is a quirk of the FAA about the hold lines and the
runway safety area. Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line.
Don't cross that and we don't care. Airports Division cares about the
runway safety area, which is defined by the hold short lines on the
taxiway and usually some kind of markers in the grass alongside the
runways at I think 150 feet from the centerline.

Koopas Ly wrote:
Hi all,

After a short local flight, I landed on 4L at HNL and forgot to hold
short of 4R. After I made the right turn on taxiway Echo from 4L, the
tower (sensing that I was taxiing a bit fast) tells me, in a rather
calm voice, "hold short of 4R!".

By that time, I had already crossed the 4R hold bars. I was not on
runway 4R, just between the hold bars and the runway edge. There was
neither departing nor landing traffic. I apologized, and the tower
told me to contact ground. Never heard from the tower again.

What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form?

Thanks,
Alex


  #4  
Old November 10th 03, 11:07 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Newps wrote in message news:mENrb.161019$Tr4.433525@attbi_s03...
The hold lines mean absolutely nothing to ATC. The only thing that
matters is that you didn't actually get onto the runway, past the solid
white line. It is a quirk of the FAA about the hold lines and the
runway safety area. Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line.
Don't cross that and we don't care. Airports Division cares about the
runway safety area, which is defined by the hold short lines on the
taxiway and usually some kind of markers in the grass alongside the
runways at I think 150 feet from the centerline.


That's interesting. It would seem that all of the tower controllers
out there do not know this. I've witnessed more than one go around
instigated by a tower because another plane was just over the hold
short bars (but not on the runway proper). Just a few weeks ago I
heard the tower telling a student pilot that he could not land any
more traffic on the runway until the student moved his airplane 3 ft.
to clear the bars.

To be fair, I've only noticed this hyper-picky behavior since the FAA
started that runway incursion program several years back.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #5  
Old November 11th 03, 04:47 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Galban wrote:

That's interesting. It would seem that all of the tower controllers
out there do not know this. I've witnessed more than one go around
instigated by a tower because another plane was just over the hold
short bars (but not on the runway proper).


That controller is an idiot.


Just a few weeks ago I
heard the tower telling a student pilot that he could not land any
more traffic on the runway until the student moved his airplane 3 ft.
to clear the bars.


We will tell the students what they are supposed to do, and that is to
stay behind the hold line. But if an airplane crosses the line do you
start sending traffic around? Not in a million years.



To be fair, I've only noticed this hyper-picky behavior since the FAA
started that runway incursion program several years back.


Tower managers who come from Centers are the worst to deal with.
They're all hot and bothered about trivialities like hold lines and
generally make life difficult for a tower controller. We had one here
for a few years, he really made the union membership rise.

  #6  
Old November 12th 03, 01:37 AM
Mark Kolber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:54:10 GMT, Newps wrote:

Air Traffic only cares about the solid white line.
Don't cross that and we don't care.


They =definitely= care at APA.

Mark Kolber
APA/Denver, Colorado
www.midlifeflight.com
======================
email? Remove ".no.spam"
  #7  
Old November 10th 03, 09:35 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Koopas Ly wrote:

What should I do? Should I fill out the NASA form?


In this case, I think so.

George Patterson
If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging
the problem.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving violation..NASA form? Nasir Piloting 47 November 5th 03 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.