![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ben Smith wrote: N488RD is what I saw on TV yesterday. '66 M20E, looked pretty nice. Newer paint scheme, 3 blade prop. Based in Jacksonville. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron, I couldn't agree more, the presentation and updating of the
ADIZ/FRZ/TFR data is a dangerous mess. Hell, I thought poorly of the NOTAM system long before 9/11. Since then, it's been overloaded to the point where I'm sure many don't read the damned NOTAMS because it's too confusing. However, in fairness to Jay, he's right too. If someone with a real pilot certificate hasn't figured out by now that there is a FRZ somewhere around Washington DC, and that person can't figure out that they're headed right toward the middle of the city, then I don't believe they should be behind the controls of an aircraft. We've all had times when we weren't sure of our actual position (mostly before GPS became common), but gosh, it's hard to miss a city. And even if one had no idea of position within 10 miles of accuracy (hard to imagine, but possible) one would at least know which headings were more likely to in to danger than others. We pilots are mere mortals. The NOTAM system is a relic of the teletype days. Hell, all the FAA has to do is build something resembling a few moderated news servers and they'd have a vast improvement over what we're using now. Then allow for intelligent clients to search the news database for relevant information by geographical significance, and it would satisfy at least 90% of most of the gripes we have today. But, of course, knowing those cheerfully silly FAA planners, it'll become a monster project with all sorts of overhead and maintenance, it'll be designed for the next five decades of flight, and it'll cost so much that it'll fall on the floor as too impractical. Sigh. Jake Brodsky, PP ASEL IA, Cessna Cardinal N30946, Based @ FME Amateur Radio Station AB3A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
but gosh, it's hard to miss a city.
Actually, it's quite rural around the boundaries of the DC ADIZ. But 600? That's ineptitude on a grand scale Well, something's broke. Maybe it's not the pilots? Last time I was in the DC area ATC was talking about scrambling jets becuase a pilot was confused about which code he was supposed to use (they gave him two - one at the start of the flight for the ADIZ and one when he was approaching it) I'd like to know how many terrorists were stopped by these intercepts. It's real easy to sit on a high horse. But you make mistakes too. (and by "you" I mean every reader here, including me) And the mistake you're most likely to make next is the one you don't think you'll ever make because you know better. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Anyway, for those of you who are not based anywhere near the DC ADIZ here is my recommendation: File IFR. Yeah, that's the "safe" way. But having done it VFR (to Gaithersberg) I can say VFR is not a big deal. Just be sure to get your squawk code before entering. If you're on flight following, that makes it easier. If you popped up (like from 1500 feet), do so eariler rather than later, to give them time to screw up and fix it again. As with anything, it's not the making of mistakes, it's the magnitude of the mistake and how far you go before it is discovered. Yes. But in this case, the "magnitude" of the mistake is artificially inflated by the stupid system. It still falls on the pilot, but let there be no mistake here - if the rules said that pilots had to wiggle their wings three times and toss a carrot out the window before gaining admittance to the zone, not doing so would be an "equally" big mistake. For the same inane reason. This is a mistake on par with not preflighting an aircraft before the first flight of the day. To me, this is like forgetting to get dressed in the morning before walking outdoors. Not preflighting can get you killed due to the laws of physics. Not getting dressed (at least on a nice day) has no consequences other than the arbitrary and artificial ones society imposes. Ditto this %@*$ TFR situation. There is a difference. What's broken is the assumption that ATC is staffed... What's broken is the assumption that this really DOES stop pink elephants. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... File IFR. IFR won't protect you from the FRZ by the way. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jake Brodsky wrote in message . ..
Sorry folks, that's the way it is. If you don't like it, please complain to your congress critters. I have. I got a letter from Senator Mikulski and a staggeringly ignorant form letter from Admiral Loy. We aren't making enough noise about this issue. Until we do, this aviation paranoia will get worse, not better. Jake, Would you care to share what you found staggeringly ignorant about Loy's form letter? Just curious. Sydney |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |
Help - I busted into the Class B SEATAC airspace last night, does anyone have any advice ? | steve mew | Piloting | 38 | October 28th 03 06:08 PM |
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:51 PM |